Do experts use idealised structural models?

Insights from a deepwater fold-thrust belt

Taija Marianne Torvela, Clare Elizabeth Bond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical models are often used to aid interpretation of geological data. For foldethrust belts, structural and kinematic models have existed for over a century. While greatly contributing to our understanding of thrust systems, the usage of models can result in oversimplification and false kinematic interpretations. This paper investigates how and if experts use structural models in the interpretation of a seismic image from a deepwater foldethrust belt. The results show that in the majority of cases experts produced interpretations that were compliant with key features in existing structural models. Those interpretations that were less compliant to existing models, better accounted for features present in natural and experimental analogues. This has implications for the general applicability of structural models in interpretation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-58
JournalJournal of Structural Geology
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

thrust
fold
kinematics

Keywords

  • structural geology
  • fold thrust belts
  • uncertainty
  • models

Cite this

Do experts use idealised structural models? Insights from a deepwater fold-thrust belt. / Torvela, Taija Marianne; Bond, Clare Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 33, 01.2011, p. 51-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eaef16c847f04d49996b6c9ab2fe458d,
title = "Do experts use idealised structural models?: Insights from a deepwater fold-thrust belt",
abstract = "Theoretical models are often used to aid interpretation of geological data. For foldethrust belts, structural and kinematic models have existed for over a century. While greatly contributing to our understanding of thrust systems, the usage of models can result in oversimplification and false kinematic interpretations. This paper investigates how and if experts use structural models in the interpretation of a seismic image from a deepwater foldethrust belt. The results show that in the majority of cases experts produced interpretations that were compliant with key features in existing structural models. Those interpretations that were less compliant to existing models, better accounted for features present in natural and experimental analogues. This has implications for the general applicability of structural models in interpretation.",
keywords = "structural geology , fold thrust belts, uncertainty, models",
author = "Torvela, {Taija Marianne} and Bond, {Clare Elizabeth}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsg.2010.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "51--58",
journal = "Journal of Structural Geology",
issn = "0191-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do experts use idealised structural models?

T2 - Insights from a deepwater fold-thrust belt

AU - Torvela, Taija Marianne

AU - Bond, Clare Elizabeth

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Theoretical models are often used to aid interpretation of geological data. For foldethrust belts, structural and kinematic models have existed for over a century. While greatly contributing to our understanding of thrust systems, the usage of models can result in oversimplification and false kinematic interpretations. This paper investigates how and if experts use structural models in the interpretation of a seismic image from a deepwater foldethrust belt. The results show that in the majority of cases experts produced interpretations that were compliant with key features in existing structural models. Those interpretations that were less compliant to existing models, better accounted for features present in natural and experimental analogues. This has implications for the general applicability of structural models in interpretation.

AB - Theoretical models are often used to aid interpretation of geological data. For foldethrust belts, structural and kinematic models have existed for over a century. While greatly contributing to our understanding of thrust systems, the usage of models can result in oversimplification and false kinematic interpretations. This paper investigates how and if experts use structural models in the interpretation of a seismic image from a deepwater foldethrust belt. The results show that in the majority of cases experts produced interpretations that were compliant with key features in existing structural models. Those interpretations that were less compliant to existing models, better accounted for features present in natural and experimental analogues. This has implications for the general applicability of structural models in interpretation.

KW - structural geology

KW - fold thrust belts

KW - uncertainty

KW - models

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2010.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2010.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 51

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Structural Geology

JF - Journal of Structural Geology

SN - 0191-8141

ER -