Do experts use idealised structural models? Insights from a deepwater fold-thrust belt

Taija Marianne Torvela, Clare Elizabeth Bond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical models are often used to aid interpretation of geological data. For foldethrust belts, structural and kinematic models have existed for over a century. While greatly contributing to our understanding of thrust systems, the usage of models can result in oversimplification and false kinematic interpretations. This paper investigates how and if experts use structural models in the interpretation of a seismic image from a deepwater foldethrust belt. The results show that in the majority of cases experts produced interpretations that were compliant with key features in existing structural models. Those interpretations that were less compliant to existing models, better accounted for features present in natural and experimental analogues. This has implications for the general applicability of structural models in interpretation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-58
JournalJournal of Structural Geology
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • structural geology
  • fold thrust belts
  • uncertainty
  • models

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do experts use idealised structural models? Insights from a deepwater fold-thrust belt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this