Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soussana et al. (2007) published their findings of a large and careful analysis of flux measurements over European grasslands. The nine sites at which fluxes were measured appeared to be acting as a sink for carbon (C), with a measured flux of -240 ± 70 g C m(-2) y(-1) , equating to a net storage of C of 104 ± 73 g C m(-2) y(-1) (= ~1 t C ha(-1) y(-1) ), when C imports and exports were accounted for. Although not proposed by the authors, but perhaps resulting from the title of a later paper (Soussana et al. 2010), this finding has increasingly been used (particularly by organisations representing livestock producers) to suggest that grasslands are a perpetual sink for carbon, and that just maintaining grasslands will yield a net carbon sink. In this short article, I examine this suggestion by reviewing evidence from repeated soil surveys, long term grassland experiments and simple mass balance calculations, before suggesting a potential explanation for the flux findings, and presenting a series of conclusions and policy recommendations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2708-2711
Number of pages4
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume20
Issue number9
Early online date8 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Carbon
grassland
Fluxes
carbon
Soil surveys
carbon sink
soil survey
flux measurement
Agriculture
import
livestock
mass balance
experiment
Experiments

Keywords

  • carbon
  • flux
  • grassland
  • sequestration
  • sink
  • soil stock

Cite this

Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon? / Smith, Pete.

In: Global Change Biology, Vol. 20, No. 9, 09.2014, p. 2708-2711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{502aaab2332b43399d3df9c27bcd4d35,
title = "Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon?",
abstract = "Soussana et al. (2007) published their findings of a large and careful analysis of flux measurements over European grasslands. The nine sites at which fluxes were measured appeared to be acting as a sink for carbon (C), with a measured flux of -240 ± 70 g C m(-2) y(-1) , equating to a net storage of C of 104 ± 73 g C m(-2) y(-1) (= ~1 t C ha(-1) y(-1) ), when C imports and exports were accounted for. Although not proposed by the authors, but perhaps resulting from the title of a later paper (Soussana et al. 2010), this finding has increasingly been used (particularly by organisations representing livestock producers) to suggest that grasslands are a perpetual sink for carbon, and that just maintaining grasslands will yield a net carbon sink. In this short article, I examine this suggestion by reviewing evidence from repeated soil surveys, long term grassland experiments and simple mass balance calculations, before suggesting a potential explanation for the flux findings, and presenting a series of conclusions and policy recommendations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "carbon, flux, grassland, sequestration, sink, soil stock",
author = "Pete Smith",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/gcb.12561",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "2708--2711",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon?

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Soussana et al. (2007) published their findings of a large and careful analysis of flux measurements over European grasslands. The nine sites at which fluxes were measured appeared to be acting as a sink for carbon (C), with a measured flux of -240 ± 70 g C m(-2) y(-1) , equating to a net storage of C of 104 ± 73 g C m(-2) y(-1) (= ~1 t C ha(-1) y(-1) ), when C imports and exports were accounted for. Although not proposed by the authors, but perhaps resulting from the title of a later paper (Soussana et al. 2010), this finding has increasingly been used (particularly by organisations representing livestock producers) to suggest that grasslands are a perpetual sink for carbon, and that just maintaining grasslands will yield a net carbon sink. In this short article, I examine this suggestion by reviewing evidence from repeated soil surveys, long term grassland experiments and simple mass balance calculations, before suggesting a potential explanation for the flux findings, and presenting a series of conclusions and policy recommendations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - Soussana et al. (2007) published their findings of a large and careful analysis of flux measurements over European grasslands. The nine sites at which fluxes were measured appeared to be acting as a sink for carbon (C), with a measured flux of -240 ± 70 g C m(-2) y(-1) , equating to a net storage of C of 104 ± 73 g C m(-2) y(-1) (= ~1 t C ha(-1) y(-1) ), when C imports and exports were accounted for. Although not proposed by the authors, but perhaps resulting from the title of a later paper (Soussana et al. 2010), this finding has increasingly been used (particularly by organisations representing livestock producers) to suggest that grasslands are a perpetual sink for carbon, and that just maintaining grasslands will yield a net carbon sink. In this short article, I examine this suggestion by reviewing evidence from repeated soil surveys, long term grassland experiments and simple mass balance calculations, before suggesting a potential explanation for the flux findings, and presenting a series of conclusions and policy recommendations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

KW - carbon

KW - flux

KW - grassland

KW - sequestration

KW - sink

KW - soil stock

U2 - 10.1111/gcb.12561

DO - 10.1111/gcb.12561

M3 - Article

C2 - 24604749

VL - 20

SP - 2708

EP - 2711

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

IS - 9

ER -