Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists? An Example using Woodland Birds

Shelley A. Hinsley, Ross A Hill, Paul Bellamy, Richard K. Broughton, Neale Harrison, Julia MacKenzie, John Roger Speakman, Peter N. Ferns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Demands on land use in heavily populated landscapes create mosaic structures where semi-natural habitat patches are generally small and dominated by edges. Small patches are also more exposed and thus more vulnerable to adverse weather and potential effects of climate change. These conditions may be less problematic for generalist species than for specialists. Using insectivorous woodland birds (great tits and blue tits) as an example, we demonstrate that even generalists suffer reduced breeding success (in particular, rearing fewer and poorer-quality young) and increased parental costs (daily energy expenditure) when living in such highly modified secondary habitats (small woods, parks, farmland). Within-habitat heterogeneity (using the example of Monks Wood NNR) is generally associated with greater species diversity, but to benefit from heterogeneity at a landscape scale may require both high mobility and the ability to thrive in small habitat patches. Modern landscapes, dominated by small, modified and scattered habitat patches, may fail to provide specialists, especially sedentary ones, with access to sufficient quantity and quality of resources, while simultaneously increasing the potential for competition from generalists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-526
Number of pages18
JournalLandscape Research
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Airborne remote sensing
  • habitat fragmentation
  • marsh tit
  • parkland
  • phenology
  • tits parus-major
  • laser-scanning data
  • great tits
  • breeding success
  • habitat quality
  • blue tits
  • poecile-palustris
  • suburban gardens
  • lidar data
  • reproduction

Cite this

Hinsley, S. A., Hill, R. A., Bellamy, P., Broughton, R. K., Harrison, N., MacKenzie, J., ... Ferns, P. N. (2009). Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists? An Example using Woodland Birds. Landscape Research, 34(5), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390903177276

Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists? An Example using Woodland Birds. / Hinsley, Shelley A.; Hill, Ross A; Bellamy, Paul; Broughton, Richard K.; Harrison, Neale; MacKenzie, Julia; Speakman, John Roger; Ferns, Peter N.

In: Landscape Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2009, p. 509-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hinsley, SA, Hill, RA, Bellamy, P, Broughton, RK, Harrison, N, MacKenzie, J, Speakman, JR & Ferns, PN 2009, 'Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists? An Example using Woodland Birds', Landscape Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 509-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390903177276
Hinsley, Shelley A. ; Hill, Ross A ; Bellamy, Paul ; Broughton, Richard K. ; Harrison, Neale ; MacKenzie, Julia ; Speakman, John Roger ; Ferns, Peter N. / Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists? An Example using Woodland Birds. In: Landscape Research. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 5. pp. 509-526.
@article{0adbfa2254c14c18be4021db7af2dccc,
title = "Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists?: An Example using Woodland Birds",
abstract = "Demands on land use in heavily populated landscapes create mosaic structures where semi-natural habitat patches are generally small and dominated by edges. Small patches are also more exposed and thus more vulnerable to adverse weather and potential effects of climate change. These conditions may be less problematic for generalist species than for specialists. Using insectivorous woodland birds (great tits and blue tits) as an example, we demonstrate that even generalists suffer reduced breeding success (in particular, rearing fewer and poorer-quality young) and increased parental costs (daily energy expenditure) when living in such highly modified secondary habitats (small woods, parks, farmland). Within-habitat heterogeneity (using the example of Monks Wood NNR) is generally associated with greater species diversity, but to benefit from heterogeneity at a landscape scale may require both high mobility and the ability to thrive in small habitat patches. Modern landscapes, dominated by small, modified and scattered habitat patches, may fail to provide specialists, especially sedentary ones, with access to sufficient quantity and quality of resources, while simultaneously increasing the potential for competition from generalists.",
keywords = "Airborne remote sensing, habitat fragmentation, marsh tit, parkland, phenology, tits parus-major, laser-scanning data, great tits, breeding success, habitat quality, blue tits, poecile-palustris, suburban gardens, lidar data, reproduction",
author = "Hinsley, {Shelley A.} and Hill, {Ross A} and Paul Bellamy and Broughton, {Richard K.} and Neale Harrison and Julia MacKenzie and Speakman, {John Roger} and Ferns, {Peter N.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/01426390903177276",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "509--526",
journal = "Landscape Research",
issn = "0142-6397",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Highly Modified Landscapes Favour Generalists at the Expense of Specialists?

T2 - An Example using Woodland Birds

AU - Hinsley, Shelley A.

AU - Hill, Ross A

AU - Bellamy, Paul

AU - Broughton, Richard K.

AU - Harrison, Neale

AU - MacKenzie, Julia

AU - Speakman, John Roger

AU - Ferns, Peter N.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Demands on land use in heavily populated landscapes create mosaic structures where semi-natural habitat patches are generally small and dominated by edges. Small patches are also more exposed and thus more vulnerable to adverse weather and potential effects of climate change. These conditions may be less problematic for generalist species than for specialists. Using insectivorous woodland birds (great tits and blue tits) as an example, we demonstrate that even generalists suffer reduced breeding success (in particular, rearing fewer and poorer-quality young) and increased parental costs (daily energy expenditure) when living in such highly modified secondary habitats (small woods, parks, farmland). Within-habitat heterogeneity (using the example of Monks Wood NNR) is generally associated with greater species diversity, but to benefit from heterogeneity at a landscape scale may require both high mobility and the ability to thrive in small habitat patches. Modern landscapes, dominated by small, modified and scattered habitat patches, may fail to provide specialists, especially sedentary ones, with access to sufficient quantity and quality of resources, while simultaneously increasing the potential for competition from generalists.

AB - Demands on land use in heavily populated landscapes create mosaic structures where semi-natural habitat patches are generally small and dominated by edges. Small patches are also more exposed and thus more vulnerable to adverse weather and potential effects of climate change. These conditions may be less problematic for generalist species than for specialists. Using insectivorous woodland birds (great tits and blue tits) as an example, we demonstrate that even generalists suffer reduced breeding success (in particular, rearing fewer and poorer-quality young) and increased parental costs (daily energy expenditure) when living in such highly modified secondary habitats (small woods, parks, farmland). Within-habitat heterogeneity (using the example of Monks Wood NNR) is generally associated with greater species diversity, but to benefit from heterogeneity at a landscape scale may require both high mobility and the ability to thrive in small habitat patches. Modern landscapes, dominated by small, modified and scattered habitat patches, may fail to provide specialists, especially sedentary ones, with access to sufficient quantity and quality of resources, while simultaneously increasing the potential for competition from generalists.

KW - Airborne remote sensing

KW - habitat fragmentation

KW - marsh tit

KW - parkland

KW - phenology

KW - tits parus-major

KW - laser-scanning data

KW - great tits

KW - breeding success

KW - habitat quality

KW - blue tits

KW - poecile-palustris

KW - suburban gardens

KW - lidar data

KW - reproduction

U2 - 10.1080/01426390903177276

DO - 10.1080/01426390903177276

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 509

EP - 526

JO - Landscape Research

JF - Landscape Research

SN - 0142-6397

IS - 5

ER -