Do patients and expert doctors agree on the assessment of consultation skills?: A comparison of two patient consultation assessment scales with the video component of the MRCGP

B. McKinstry, J. Walker, D. Blaney, David James Heaney, D. Begg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient ratings of general practice Registrars' consulting skills are associated with 'expert' scoring using the MRCGP video assessment protocol.

Methods. A cross-sectional observational study of general practice Registrars' consultation skills was carried out in 23 practices in South East Scotland using two types of patient assessment compared with expert assessment of video consultation. The main outcome measures were rank correlation of Registrars' overall level of attainment on the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) video assessment with mean score on the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and mean score on the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ).

Results. The rank correlation of Registrars' mean PEI scores with marks on the RCGP video component was 0.01 (P = 0.97, n = 19) and mean CSQ score 0.05 (P = 0.83, n = 19). There were no adverse comments from patients, but Registrars and trainers found the process onerous.

Conclusion. No meaningful association was identified between Registrars' score on the RCGP video examination and patient assessment via either the PEI or the CSQ. This suggests that, with regard to measuring quality in the consultation, one or more of the assessments are invalid or that they are measuring different attributes. Further research to elucidate the reasons for the lack of correlation is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-80
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Practice
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • assessment
  • consultation skills
  • patients
  • Registrars
  • GENERAL-PRACTICE CONSULTATIONS
  • CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY
  • QUALITY
  • SATISFACTION
  • ENABLEMENT
  • CONSENT
  • CARE

Cite this

Do patients and expert doctors agree on the assessment of consultation skills?: A comparison of two patient consultation assessment scales with the video component of the MRCGP. / McKinstry, B.; Walker, J.; Blaney, D.; Heaney, David James; Begg, D.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 21, 2004, p. 75-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df44202b506242fe8313e6a83a55b558,
title = "Do patients and expert doctors agree on the assessment of consultation skills?: A comparison of two patient consultation assessment scales with the video component of the MRCGP",
abstract = "Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient ratings of general practice Registrars' consulting skills are associated with 'expert' scoring using the MRCGP video assessment protocol.Methods. A cross-sectional observational study of general practice Registrars' consultation skills was carried out in 23 practices in South East Scotland using two types of patient assessment compared with expert assessment of video consultation. The main outcome measures were rank correlation of Registrars' overall level of attainment on the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) video assessment with mean score on the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and mean score on the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ).Results. The rank correlation of Registrars' mean PEI scores with marks on the RCGP video component was 0.01 (P = 0.97, n = 19) and mean CSQ score 0.05 (P = 0.83, n = 19). There were no adverse comments from patients, but Registrars and trainers found the process onerous.Conclusion. No meaningful association was identified between Registrars' score on the RCGP video examination and patient assessment via either the PEI or the CSQ. This suggests that, with regard to measuring quality in the consultation, one or more of the assessments are invalid or that they are measuring different attributes. Further research to elucidate the reasons for the lack of correlation is required.",
keywords = "assessment, consultation skills, patients, Registrars, GENERAL-PRACTICE CONSULTATIONS, CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY, QUALITY, SATISFACTION, ENABLEMENT, CONSENT, CARE",
author = "B. McKinstry and J. Walker and D. Blaney and Heaney, {David James} and D. Begg",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmh116",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "75--80",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do patients and expert doctors agree on the assessment of consultation skills?: A comparison of two patient consultation assessment scales with the video component of the MRCGP

AU - McKinstry, B.

AU - Walker, J.

AU - Blaney, D.

AU - Heaney, David James

AU - Begg, D.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient ratings of general practice Registrars' consulting skills are associated with 'expert' scoring using the MRCGP video assessment protocol.Methods. A cross-sectional observational study of general practice Registrars' consultation skills was carried out in 23 practices in South East Scotland using two types of patient assessment compared with expert assessment of video consultation. The main outcome measures were rank correlation of Registrars' overall level of attainment on the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) video assessment with mean score on the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and mean score on the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ).Results. The rank correlation of Registrars' mean PEI scores with marks on the RCGP video component was 0.01 (P = 0.97, n = 19) and mean CSQ score 0.05 (P = 0.83, n = 19). There were no adverse comments from patients, but Registrars and trainers found the process onerous.Conclusion. No meaningful association was identified between Registrars' score on the RCGP video examination and patient assessment via either the PEI or the CSQ. This suggests that, with regard to measuring quality in the consultation, one or more of the assessments are invalid or that they are measuring different attributes. Further research to elucidate the reasons for the lack of correlation is required.

AB - Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient ratings of general practice Registrars' consulting skills are associated with 'expert' scoring using the MRCGP video assessment protocol.Methods. A cross-sectional observational study of general practice Registrars' consultation skills was carried out in 23 practices in South East Scotland using two types of patient assessment compared with expert assessment of video consultation. The main outcome measures were rank correlation of Registrars' overall level of attainment on the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) video assessment with mean score on the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and mean score on the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ).Results. The rank correlation of Registrars' mean PEI scores with marks on the RCGP video component was 0.01 (P = 0.97, n = 19) and mean CSQ score 0.05 (P = 0.83, n = 19). There were no adverse comments from patients, but Registrars and trainers found the process onerous.Conclusion. No meaningful association was identified between Registrars' score on the RCGP video examination and patient assessment via either the PEI or the CSQ. This suggests that, with regard to measuring quality in the consultation, one or more of the assessments are invalid or that they are measuring different attributes. Further research to elucidate the reasons for the lack of correlation is required.

KW - assessment

KW - consultation skills

KW - patients

KW - Registrars

KW - GENERAL-PRACTICE CONSULTATIONS

KW - CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY

KW - QUALITY

KW - SATISFACTION

KW - ENABLEMENT

KW - CONSENT

KW - CARE

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmh116

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmh116

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 75

EP - 80

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

ER -