Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?

Alexandra Alice Cleland, M. J. Pickering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-198
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Keywords

  • priming
  • syntax
  • writing
  • speaking
  • language production
  • orthography
  • phonology
  • IMPROVING WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
  • SENTENCE PRODUCTION
  • LANGUAGE PRODUCTION
  • LEXICAL ACCESS
  • WORKING-MEMORY
  • GRAMMATICAL GENDER
  • SPEECH PRODUCTION
  • PHRASE STRUCTURE
  • WORD-ORDER
  • SPOKEN

Cite this

Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? / Cleland, Alexandra Alice; Pickering, M. J.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 54, No. 2, 01.2006, p. 185-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f96f16d1142d4d63996074366e272538,
title = "Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?",
abstract = "Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "priming, syntax, writing, speaking, language production, orthography, phonology, IMPROVING WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, SENTENCE PRODUCTION, LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, LEXICAL ACCESS, WORKING-MEMORY, GRAMMATICAL GENDER, SPEECH PRODUCTION, PHRASE STRUCTURE, WORD-ORDER, SPOKEN",
author = "Cleland, {Alexandra Alice} and Pickering, {M. J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "185--198",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?

AU - Cleland, Alexandra Alice

AU - Pickering, M. J.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - priming

KW - syntax

KW - writing

KW - speaking

KW - language production

KW - orthography

KW - phonology

KW - IMPROVING WRITTEN COMMUNICATION

KW - SENTENCE PRODUCTION

KW - LANGUAGE PRODUCTION

KW - LEXICAL ACCESS

KW - WORKING-MEMORY

KW - GRAMMATICAL GENDER

KW - SPEECH PRODUCTION

KW - PHRASE STRUCTURE

KW - WORD-ORDER

KW - SPOKEN

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 185

EP - 198

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 2

ER -