Doctors under the microscope

The birth of medical audit

William J. Jackson, Audrey S. Paterson, Christopher K. M. Pong (Corresponding Author), Simona Scarparo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1989 a UK government White Paper introduced medical audit as a comprehensive and statutory system of assessment and improvement in quality of care in hospitals. A considerable body of research has described the evolution of medical audit in terms of a struggle between doctors and National Health Service managers over control of quality assurance. In this paper we examine the emergence of medical audit from 1910 to the early 1950s, with a particular focus on the pioneering work of the American surgeons Codman, MacEachern and Ponton. It is contended that medical professionals initially created medical audit in order to articulate a suitable methodology for assessing individual and organisational performance. Rather than a means of protecting the medical profession from public scrutiny, medical auditing was conceived and operationalised as a managerial tool for fostering the active engagement of senior hospital managers and discharging public accountability. These early debates reveal how accounting was implicated in the development of a system for monitoring and improving the work of medical professionals, advancing the quality of hospital care, and was advocated in ways, which included rather than excluded managers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-47
Number of pages25
JournalAccounting History Review
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date14 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Audit
Doctors
Microscope
Managers
Surgeon
Monitoring
Organizational Performance
1950s
Scrutiny
Methodology
Government
National Health Service
Quality Assurance
Medical Profession
Accountability
Quality assurance
Quality of care
Auditing
Medical profession
Pioneering

Keywords

  • end results
  • medical audit
  • professional accounting
  • quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • History

Cite this

Doctors under the microscope : The birth of medical audit. / Jackson, William J.; Paterson, Audrey S.; Pong, Christopher K. M. (Corresponding Author); Scarparo, Simona.

In: Accounting History Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 23-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, William J. ; Paterson, Audrey S. ; Pong, Christopher K. M. ; Scarparo, Simona. / Doctors under the microscope : The birth of medical audit. In: Accounting History Review. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 23-47.
@article{de5f7cd5bcaa44f49a682fb61a94c718,
title = "Doctors under the microscope: The birth of medical audit",
abstract = "In 1989 a UK government White Paper introduced medical audit as a comprehensive and statutory system of assessment and improvement in quality of care in hospitals. A considerable body of research has described the evolution of medical audit in terms of a struggle between doctors and National Health Service managers over control of quality assurance. In this paper we examine the emergence of medical audit from 1910 to the early 1950s, with a particular focus on the pioneering work of the American surgeons Codman, MacEachern and Ponton. It is contended that medical professionals initially created medical audit in order to articulate a suitable methodology for assessing individual and organisational performance. Rather than a means of protecting the medical profession from public scrutiny, medical auditing was conceived and operationalised as a managerial tool for fostering the active engagement of senior hospital managers and discharging public accountability. These early debates reveal how accounting was implicated in the development of a system for monitoring and improving the work of medical professionals, advancing the quality of hospital care, and was advocated in ways, which included rather than excluded managers.",
keywords = "end results, medical audit, professional accounting, quality of care",
author = "Jackson, {William J.} and Paterson, {Audrey S.} and Pong, {Christopher K. M.} and Simona Scarparo",
note = "The authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and helpful comments.",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/21552851.2013.773638",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "23--47",
journal = "Accounting History Review",
issn = "2155-2851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doctors under the microscope

T2 - The birth of medical audit

AU - Jackson, William J.

AU - Paterson, Audrey S.

AU - Pong, Christopher K. M.

AU - Scarparo, Simona

N1 - The authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and helpful comments.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - In 1989 a UK government White Paper introduced medical audit as a comprehensive and statutory system of assessment and improvement in quality of care in hospitals. A considerable body of research has described the evolution of medical audit in terms of a struggle between doctors and National Health Service managers over control of quality assurance. In this paper we examine the emergence of medical audit from 1910 to the early 1950s, with a particular focus on the pioneering work of the American surgeons Codman, MacEachern and Ponton. It is contended that medical professionals initially created medical audit in order to articulate a suitable methodology for assessing individual and organisational performance. Rather than a means of protecting the medical profession from public scrutiny, medical auditing was conceived and operationalised as a managerial tool for fostering the active engagement of senior hospital managers and discharging public accountability. These early debates reveal how accounting was implicated in the development of a system for monitoring and improving the work of medical professionals, advancing the quality of hospital care, and was advocated in ways, which included rather than excluded managers.

AB - In 1989 a UK government White Paper introduced medical audit as a comprehensive and statutory system of assessment and improvement in quality of care in hospitals. A considerable body of research has described the evolution of medical audit in terms of a struggle between doctors and National Health Service managers over control of quality assurance. In this paper we examine the emergence of medical audit from 1910 to the early 1950s, with a particular focus on the pioneering work of the American surgeons Codman, MacEachern and Ponton. It is contended that medical professionals initially created medical audit in order to articulate a suitable methodology for assessing individual and organisational performance. Rather than a means of protecting the medical profession from public scrutiny, medical auditing was conceived and operationalised as a managerial tool for fostering the active engagement of senior hospital managers and discharging public accountability. These early debates reveal how accounting was implicated in the development of a system for monitoring and improving the work of medical professionals, advancing the quality of hospital care, and was advocated in ways, which included rather than excluded managers.

KW - end results

KW - medical audit

KW - professional accounting

KW - quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875355332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21552851.2013.773638

DO - 10.1080/21552851.2013.773638

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 23

EP - 47

JO - Accounting History Review

JF - Accounting History Review

SN - 2155-2851

IS - 1

ER -