Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study

Aileen Mairi Grant, Edwin Roland Van Teijlingen, Karen Forrest, Nicola Torrance, B. J. Wilson, Neva Elizabeth Haites

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A high demand exists in the United Kingdom for breast cancer genetic counselling. Due to the disease's high incidence, many women who received such counselling are eventually assessed as not being at high genetic risk. This study elicits the experiences and perceptions of such women, as little research has been conducted. A qualitative interview-based study was conducted in the north-east of Scotland with a sample of women at low to moderate risk of developing breast cancer, who had received genetic counselling. The interviews addressed the women's reasons for attending genetic counselling, their prior expectations and their perceptions of the outcomes of counselling. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify the key themes. The women themselves were mainly responsible for raising concerns regarding family history and, in general, sought information and reassurance about their own risk. Whilst they generally felt reassured after counselling, many did not understand the information they had been given and some continued to overestimate their own risk of disease. For many an important motivation for seeking counselling was to receive (more frequent) mammography screening, for which they perceived the genetic counsellors as gatekeepers. Some also expected a genetic test. The study findings were consistent with much of the published literature. Genetic counsellors must understand that genetic information, especially the risk as perceived, is not always well understood. This in turn may influence the further communication of risk information within the family. Also, people coming forward for genetic counselling may not be aware of some of the unintended consequences of such counselling, such as, for example, having to declare information to insurance companies and/or (potential) employers. If primary care practitioners are the main route through which people reach genetic counsellors, these professionals need to be kept up to date on issues related to genetics, and genetic testing and counselling.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-293
Number of pages12
JournalCritical Public Health
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Genetic Counseling
Counseling
Breast Neoplasms
Interviews
Genetic Testing
Scotland
Mammography
Insurance
Motivation
Primary Health Care
Communication
Incidence
Research
Counselors

Keywords

  • familial disease
  • family history
  • genetic counselling
  • hereditary breast cancer
  • mammography screening
  • nurse-led counselling
  • qualitative methods
  • risk perception
  • Scotland

Cite this

Grant, A. M., Van Teijlingen, E. R., Forrest, K., Torrance, N., Wilson, B. J., & Haites, N. E. (2006). Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study. Critical Public Health, 16(4), 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590601089038

Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study. / Grant, Aileen Mairi; Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland; Forrest, Karen; Torrance, Nicola; Wilson, B. J.; Haites, Neva Elizabeth.

In: Critical Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 4, 12.2006, p. 281-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grant, AM, Van Teijlingen, ER, Forrest, K, Torrance, N, Wilson, BJ & Haites, NE 2006, 'Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study', Critical Public Health, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590601089038
Grant AM, Van Teijlingen ER, Forrest K, Torrance N, Wilson BJ, Haites NE. Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study. Critical Public Health. 2006 Dec;16(4):281-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590601089038
Grant, Aileen Mairi ; Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland ; Forrest, Karen ; Torrance, Nicola ; Wilson, B. J. ; Haites, Neva Elizabeth. / Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study. In: Critical Public Health. 2006 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 281-293.
@article{a4225873174e4300a7f7deeb8a2adef6,
title = "Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study",
abstract = "A high demand exists in the United Kingdom for breast cancer genetic counselling. Due to the disease's high incidence, many women who received such counselling are eventually assessed as not being at high genetic risk. This study elicits the experiences and perceptions of such women, as little research has been conducted. A qualitative interview-based study was conducted in the north-east of Scotland with a sample of women at low to moderate risk of developing breast cancer, who had received genetic counselling. The interviews addressed the women's reasons for attending genetic counselling, their prior expectations and their perceptions of the outcomes of counselling. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify the key themes. The women themselves were mainly responsible for raising concerns regarding family history and, in general, sought information and reassurance about their own risk. Whilst they generally felt reassured after counselling, many did not understand the information they had been given and some continued to overestimate their own risk of disease. For many an important motivation for seeking counselling was to receive (more frequent) mammography screening, for which they perceived the genetic counsellors as gatekeepers. Some also expected a genetic test. The study findings were consistent with much of the published literature. Genetic counsellors must understand that genetic information, especially the risk as perceived, is not always well understood. This in turn may influence the further communication of risk information within the family. Also, people coming forward for genetic counselling may not be aware of some of the unintended consequences of such counselling, such as, for example, having to declare information to insurance companies and/or (potential) employers. If primary care practitioners are the main route through which people reach genetic counsellors, these professionals need to be kept up to date on issues related to genetics, and genetic testing and counselling.",
keywords = "familial disease, family history, genetic counselling, hereditary breast cancer, mammography screening, nurse-led counselling, qualitative methods, risk perception, Scotland",
author = "Grant, {Aileen Mairi} and {Van Teijlingen}, {Edwin Roland} and Karen Forrest and Nicola Torrance and Wilson, {B. J.} and Haites, {Neva Elizabeth}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/09581590601089038",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "281--293",
journal = "Critical Public Health",
issn = "0958-1596",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does breast cancer genetic counselling meet women’s expectations? A qualitative study

AU - Grant, Aileen Mairi

AU - Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland

AU - Forrest, Karen

AU - Torrance, Nicola

AU - Wilson, B. J.

AU - Haites, Neva Elizabeth

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - A high demand exists in the United Kingdom for breast cancer genetic counselling. Due to the disease's high incidence, many women who received such counselling are eventually assessed as not being at high genetic risk. This study elicits the experiences and perceptions of such women, as little research has been conducted. A qualitative interview-based study was conducted in the north-east of Scotland with a sample of women at low to moderate risk of developing breast cancer, who had received genetic counselling. The interviews addressed the women's reasons for attending genetic counselling, their prior expectations and their perceptions of the outcomes of counselling. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify the key themes. The women themselves were mainly responsible for raising concerns regarding family history and, in general, sought information and reassurance about their own risk. Whilst they generally felt reassured after counselling, many did not understand the information they had been given and some continued to overestimate their own risk of disease. For many an important motivation for seeking counselling was to receive (more frequent) mammography screening, for which they perceived the genetic counsellors as gatekeepers. Some also expected a genetic test. The study findings were consistent with much of the published literature. Genetic counsellors must understand that genetic information, especially the risk as perceived, is not always well understood. This in turn may influence the further communication of risk information within the family. Also, people coming forward for genetic counselling may not be aware of some of the unintended consequences of such counselling, such as, for example, having to declare information to insurance companies and/or (potential) employers. If primary care practitioners are the main route through which people reach genetic counsellors, these professionals need to be kept up to date on issues related to genetics, and genetic testing and counselling.

AB - A high demand exists in the United Kingdom for breast cancer genetic counselling. Due to the disease's high incidence, many women who received such counselling are eventually assessed as not being at high genetic risk. This study elicits the experiences and perceptions of such women, as little research has been conducted. A qualitative interview-based study was conducted in the north-east of Scotland with a sample of women at low to moderate risk of developing breast cancer, who had received genetic counselling. The interviews addressed the women's reasons for attending genetic counselling, their prior expectations and their perceptions of the outcomes of counselling. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify the key themes. The women themselves were mainly responsible for raising concerns regarding family history and, in general, sought information and reassurance about their own risk. Whilst they generally felt reassured after counselling, many did not understand the information they had been given and some continued to overestimate their own risk of disease. For many an important motivation for seeking counselling was to receive (more frequent) mammography screening, for which they perceived the genetic counsellors as gatekeepers. Some also expected a genetic test. The study findings were consistent with much of the published literature. Genetic counsellors must understand that genetic information, especially the risk as perceived, is not always well understood. This in turn may influence the further communication of risk information within the family. Also, people coming forward for genetic counselling may not be aware of some of the unintended consequences of such counselling, such as, for example, having to declare information to insurance companies and/or (potential) employers. If primary care practitioners are the main route through which people reach genetic counsellors, these professionals need to be kept up to date on issues related to genetics, and genetic testing and counselling.

KW - familial disease

KW - family history

KW - genetic counselling

KW - hereditary breast cancer

KW - mammography screening

KW - nurse-led counselling

KW - qualitative methods

KW - risk perception

KW - Scotland

U2 - 10.1080/09581590601089038

DO - 10.1080/09581590601089038

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 281

EP - 293

JO - Critical Public Health

JF - Critical Public Health

SN - 0958-1596

IS - 4

ER -