Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference?

Akrum Helfaya (Corresponding Author), Mark Whittington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessing the quality of information disclosed by companies is a complex task. Accounting studies usually rely on analysing the content of corporate reports using measures to obtain a proxy for the information reported by companies. However, there is no consensus about the best design for these measures. The objective of the current paper is to investigate if there are significant differences in the results generated from seven alternative measures for assessing the quality of FTSE100 environmental sustainability reporting. Seven measures/indices have been used to assess disclosure quality. The three unidimensional measures include two “quantity measures” and one “scope measure” that measure the volume and width/coverage of information, respectively. Three compound measures are adopted from the literature, and the final measure is a multidimensional quality model, based on the results of a questionnaire ascertaining the perceptions of 86 preparers and 177 users of annual report (AR) and/stand-alone corporate responsibility report (CRR). Although the results of the empirical analysis indicate that the measures are significantly correlated, the choice of a specific method can result in the very different ranking of companies. The evidence presented indicates that the choice of measure is of key importance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)525-541
Number of pages17
JournalBusiness Strategy and the Environment
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date6 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

sustainability
empirical analysis
ranking
annual report
coverage
responsibility
Environmental sustainability
Disclosure quality
questionnaire
evidence
Questionnaire
Corporate responsibility
Ranking
Sustainability reporting
Empirical analysis
Annual reports
Quality of information
index
method
accounting

Keywords

  • disclosure index
  • disclosure quality measures
  • disclosure research
  • environmental sustainability information
  • UK FTSE100

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference? / Helfaya, Akrum (Corresponding Author); Whittington, Mark.

In: Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 28, No. 4, 05.2019, p. 525-541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6b7b98c15b04773a29b086dd3ea7153,
title = "Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference?",
abstract = "Assessing the quality of information disclosed by companies is a complex task. Accounting studies usually rely on analysing the content of corporate reports using measures to obtain a proxy for the information reported by companies. However, there is no consensus about the best design for these measures. The objective of the current paper is to investigate if there are significant differences in the results generated from seven alternative measures for assessing the quality of FTSE100 environmental sustainability reporting. Seven measures/indices have been used to assess disclosure quality. The three unidimensional measures include two “quantity measures” and one “scope measure” that measure the volume and width/coverage of information, respectively. Three compound measures are adopted from the literature, and the final measure is a multidimensional quality model, based on the results of a questionnaire ascertaining the perceptions of 86 preparers and 177 users of annual report (AR) and/stand-alone corporate responsibility report (CRR). Although the results of the empirical analysis indicate that the measures are significantly correlated, the choice of a specific method can result in the very different ranking of companies. The evidence presented indicates that the choice of measure is of key importance.",
keywords = "disclosure index, disclosure quality measures, disclosure research, environmental sustainability information, UK FTSE100",
author = "Akrum Helfaya and Mark Whittington",
note = "The authors would like to thank the editor (Professor Richard Welford) and the two anonymous reviewers of the journal for their constructive comments and valuable suggestions on earlier versions of the paper. The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the Faculty of Commerce, Damanhour University, Egypt.",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/bse.2262",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "525--541",
journal = "Business Strategy and the Environment",
issn = "0964-4733",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference?

AU - Helfaya, Akrum

AU - Whittington, Mark

N1 - The authors would like to thank the editor (Professor Richard Welford) and the two anonymous reviewers of the journal for their constructive comments and valuable suggestions on earlier versions of the paper. The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the Faculty of Commerce, Damanhour University, Egypt.

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Assessing the quality of information disclosed by companies is a complex task. Accounting studies usually rely on analysing the content of corporate reports using measures to obtain a proxy for the information reported by companies. However, there is no consensus about the best design for these measures. The objective of the current paper is to investigate if there are significant differences in the results generated from seven alternative measures for assessing the quality of FTSE100 environmental sustainability reporting. Seven measures/indices have been used to assess disclosure quality. The three unidimensional measures include two “quantity measures” and one “scope measure” that measure the volume and width/coverage of information, respectively. Three compound measures are adopted from the literature, and the final measure is a multidimensional quality model, based on the results of a questionnaire ascertaining the perceptions of 86 preparers and 177 users of annual report (AR) and/stand-alone corporate responsibility report (CRR). Although the results of the empirical analysis indicate that the measures are significantly correlated, the choice of a specific method can result in the very different ranking of companies. The evidence presented indicates that the choice of measure is of key importance.

AB - Assessing the quality of information disclosed by companies is a complex task. Accounting studies usually rely on analysing the content of corporate reports using measures to obtain a proxy for the information reported by companies. However, there is no consensus about the best design for these measures. The objective of the current paper is to investigate if there are significant differences in the results generated from seven alternative measures for assessing the quality of FTSE100 environmental sustainability reporting. Seven measures/indices have been used to assess disclosure quality. The three unidimensional measures include two “quantity measures” and one “scope measure” that measure the volume and width/coverage of information, respectively. Three compound measures are adopted from the literature, and the final measure is a multidimensional quality model, based on the results of a questionnaire ascertaining the perceptions of 86 preparers and 177 users of annual report (AR) and/stand-alone corporate responsibility report (CRR). Although the results of the empirical analysis indicate that the measures are significantly correlated, the choice of a specific method can result in the very different ranking of companies. The evidence presented indicates that the choice of measure is of key importance.

KW - disclosure index

KW - disclosure quality measures

KW - disclosure research

KW - environmental sustainability information

KW - UK FTSE100

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059565655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/designing-environmental-sustainability-disclosure-quality-measures-make-difference

UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2262

U2 - 10.1002/bse.2262

DO - 10.1002/bse.2262

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 525

EP - 541

JO - Business Strategy and the Environment

JF - Business Strategy and the Environment

SN - 0964-4733

IS - 4

ER -