Does gender matter? An analysis of men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms of lung cancer

Alice MacLean, Kate Hunt*, Sarah Smith, Sally Wyke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Men are often portrayed - in research studies, ‘common-sense’ accounts and popular media - as reluctant users of health services. They are said to avoid going to the GP whenever possible, while women are portrayed, in presumed opposition, as consulting more readily, more frequently and with less serious complaints. Such stereotypes may inadvertently encourage doctors to pay greater heed to men's symptoms in ‘routine’ consultations. Although previous research has challenged this view with evidence, and suggested that links between gender identities and help-seeking are complex and fluid, gender comparative studies remain uncommon, and particularly few studies (either qualitative or quantitative) compare men and women with similar morbidity. We contribute here to gender comparative research on help-seeking by investigating men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms later diagnosed as lung cancer. A secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with 27 men and 18 women attending Scottish cancer centres revealed striking similarities between men's and women's accounts. Participants were seen as negotiating a complex and delicate balance in constructing their moral integrity as, on the one hand, responsible service users who were conscious of the demands on health care professionals’ time, and as patients who did not take undue risks with their health, in the context of an illness for which people are often held culpable, on the other. In accounting for their responses to symptoms, men and women drew equally on culturally-embedded moral frameworks of stoicism and responsible service use. Regardless of gender, the accounts portrayed participants as stoic in response to illness and responsible service users; and as people seeking explanations for bodily changes and taking appropriate and timely action. Our analysis challenges simplistic, ‘common-sense’ views of gendered help-seeking and highlights that both men and women need support to consult their doctor for investigation of significant or concerning bodily changes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-142
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume191
Early online date8 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
cancer
gender
illness
Research
Lung Cancer
Negotiating
secondary analysis
comparative research
management counsulting
qualitative interview
complaint
morbidity
Health Services
integrity
stereotype
health service
opposition
Referral and Consultation
Interviews

Keywords

  • Consulting
  • Gender comparative
  • Gender identities
  • Help-seeking
  • Lung cancer
  • Men and masculinities
  • Narrative analysis
  • Qualitative
  • United Kingdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Does gender matter? An analysis of men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms of lung cancer. / MacLean, Alice; Hunt, Kate; Smith, Sarah; Wyke, Sally.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 191, 01.10.2017, p. 134-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacLean, Alice ; Hunt, Kate ; Smith, Sarah ; Wyke, Sally. / Does gender matter? An analysis of men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms of lung cancer. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 191. pp. 134-142.
@article{ee312afcd45049c1bce9dc6637929d59,
title = "Does gender matter? An analysis of men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms of lung cancer",
abstract = "Men are often portrayed - in research studies, ‘common-sense’ accounts and popular media - as reluctant users of health services. They are said to avoid going to the GP whenever possible, while women are portrayed, in presumed opposition, as consulting more readily, more frequently and with less serious complaints. Such stereotypes may inadvertently encourage doctors to pay greater heed to men's symptoms in ‘routine’ consultations. Although previous research has challenged this view with evidence, and suggested that links between gender identities and help-seeking are complex and fluid, gender comparative studies remain uncommon, and particularly few studies (either qualitative or quantitative) compare men and women with similar morbidity. We contribute here to gender comparative research on help-seeking by investigating men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms later diagnosed as lung cancer. A secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with 27 men and 18 women attending Scottish cancer centres revealed striking similarities between men's and women's accounts. Participants were seen as negotiating a complex and delicate balance in constructing their moral integrity as, on the one hand, responsible service users who were conscious of the demands on health care professionals’ time, and as patients who did not take undue risks with their health, in the context of an illness for which people are often held culpable, on the other. In accounting for their responses to symptoms, men and women drew equally on culturally-embedded moral frameworks of stoicism and responsible service use. Regardless of gender, the accounts portrayed participants as stoic in response to illness and responsible service users; and as people seeking explanations for bodily changes and taking appropriate and timely action. Our analysis challenges simplistic, ‘common-sense’ views of gendered help-seeking and highlights that both men and women need support to consult their doctor for investigation of significant or concerning bodily changes.",
keywords = "Consulting, Gender comparative, Gender identities, Help-seeking, Lung cancer, Men and masculinities, Narrative analysis, Qualitative, United Kingdom",
author = "Alice MacLean and Kate Hunt and Sarah Smith and Sally Wyke",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.015",
language = "English",
volume = "191",
pages = "134--142",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does gender matter? An analysis of men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms of lung cancer

AU - MacLean, Alice

AU - Hunt, Kate

AU - Smith, Sarah

AU - Wyke, Sally

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Men are often portrayed - in research studies, ‘common-sense’ accounts and popular media - as reluctant users of health services. They are said to avoid going to the GP whenever possible, while women are portrayed, in presumed opposition, as consulting more readily, more frequently and with less serious complaints. Such stereotypes may inadvertently encourage doctors to pay greater heed to men's symptoms in ‘routine’ consultations. Although previous research has challenged this view with evidence, and suggested that links between gender identities and help-seeking are complex and fluid, gender comparative studies remain uncommon, and particularly few studies (either qualitative or quantitative) compare men and women with similar morbidity. We contribute here to gender comparative research on help-seeking by investigating men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms later diagnosed as lung cancer. A secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with 27 men and 18 women attending Scottish cancer centres revealed striking similarities between men's and women's accounts. Participants were seen as negotiating a complex and delicate balance in constructing their moral integrity as, on the one hand, responsible service users who were conscious of the demands on health care professionals’ time, and as patients who did not take undue risks with their health, in the context of an illness for which people are often held culpable, on the other. In accounting for their responses to symptoms, men and women drew equally on culturally-embedded moral frameworks of stoicism and responsible service use. Regardless of gender, the accounts portrayed participants as stoic in response to illness and responsible service users; and as people seeking explanations for bodily changes and taking appropriate and timely action. Our analysis challenges simplistic, ‘common-sense’ views of gendered help-seeking and highlights that both men and women need support to consult their doctor for investigation of significant or concerning bodily changes.

AB - Men are often portrayed - in research studies, ‘common-sense’ accounts and popular media - as reluctant users of health services. They are said to avoid going to the GP whenever possible, while women are portrayed, in presumed opposition, as consulting more readily, more frequently and with less serious complaints. Such stereotypes may inadvertently encourage doctors to pay greater heed to men's symptoms in ‘routine’ consultations. Although previous research has challenged this view with evidence, and suggested that links between gender identities and help-seeking are complex and fluid, gender comparative studies remain uncommon, and particularly few studies (either qualitative or quantitative) compare men and women with similar morbidity. We contribute here to gender comparative research on help-seeking by investigating men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms later diagnosed as lung cancer. A secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with 27 men and 18 women attending Scottish cancer centres revealed striking similarities between men's and women's accounts. Participants were seen as negotiating a complex and delicate balance in constructing their moral integrity as, on the one hand, responsible service users who were conscious of the demands on health care professionals’ time, and as patients who did not take undue risks with their health, in the context of an illness for which people are often held culpable, on the other. In accounting for their responses to symptoms, men and women drew equally on culturally-embedded moral frameworks of stoicism and responsible service use. Regardless of gender, the accounts portrayed participants as stoic in response to illness and responsible service users; and as people seeking explanations for bodily changes and taking appropriate and timely action. Our analysis challenges simplistic, ‘common-sense’ views of gendered help-seeking and highlights that both men and women need support to consult their doctor for investigation of significant or concerning bodily changes.

KW - Consulting

KW - Gender comparative

KW - Gender identities

KW - Help-seeking

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Men and masculinities

KW - Narrative analysis

KW - Qualitative

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029353747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.015

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 28917622

AN - SCOPUS:85029353747

VL - 191

SP - 134

EP - 142

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -