Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery?

A. Eastwood, R. Brooker, R. J. Irvine, R.R.E. Artz, L.R. Norton, J.M. Bullock, L. Ross, D. Fielding, S. Ramsay, J. Roberts, W. Anderson, D. Dugan, S. Cooksley, Robin J. Pakeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whilst a number of studies have examined the effects of biodiversity conservation on the delivery of ecosystem services, they are often limited in the scope of the ecosystem services (ES) assessed and can suffer from confounding spatial issues. This paper examines the impacts of nature conservation on the delivery of a full suite of ES across nine case studies in the UK, using expert opinion. The case studies covered a range of habitats and explore the delivery of ES from a ‘protected site’ and a comparable ‘non-protected’ site. By conducting pair-wise comparisons of ES delivery between comparable sites our study attempts to mitigate confounding cause and effect factors in relation to spatial context in correlative studies. The analysis showed that protected sites deliver higher levels of ecosystem services than non-protected sites, with the main differences being in the cultural and regulating ecosystem services. Against expectations, there was no consistent negative impact of protection on provisioning services across these case studies. Whilst the analysis demonstrated general patterns in ES delivery between protected and non-protected sites, the individual responses in each case study highlights the importance of the local social, biophysical, economic and temporal context of individual protected areas and the associated management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-162
Number of pages11
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume17
Early online date4 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Fingerprint

natural resources conservation
nature conservation
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
Ecosystem
conservation
case studies
expert opinion
Biodiversity
Expert Testimony
protected area
socioeconomics
social economics
biodiversity
conservation areas
habitat
Economics
expert
cause
habitats

Keywords

  • biodiversity conservation
  • conservation designation
  • ecosystem services
  • expert opinion
  • protected areas

Cite this

Eastwood, A., Brooker, R., Irvine, R. J., Artz, R. R. E., Norton, L. R., Bullock, J. M., ... Pakeman, R. J. (2016). Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery? Ecosystem Services, 17, 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001

Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery? / Eastwood, A.; Brooker, R.; Irvine, R. J.; Artz, R.R.E.; Norton, L.R.; Bullock, J.M.; Ross, L.; Fielding, D.; Ramsay, S.; Roberts, J.; Anderson, W.; Dugan, D.; Cooksley, S.; Pakeman, Robin J.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 17, 02.2016, p. 152-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eastwood, A, Brooker, R, Irvine, RJ, Artz, RRE, Norton, LR, Bullock, JM, Ross, L, Fielding, D, Ramsay, S, Roberts, J, Anderson, W, Dugan, D, Cooksley, S & Pakeman, RJ 2016, 'Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery?', Ecosystem Services, vol. 17, pp. 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001
Eastwood A, Brooker R, Irvine RJ, Artz RRE, Norton LR, Bullock JM et al. Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery? Ecosystem Services. 2016 Feb;17:152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001
Eastwood, A. ; Brooker, R. ; Irvine, R. J. ; Artz, R.R.E. ; Norton, L.R. ; Bullock, J.M. ; Ross, L. ; Fielding, D. ; Ramsay, S. ; Roberts, J. ; Anderson, W. ; Dugan, D. ; Cooksley, S. ; Pakeman, Robin J. / Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery?. In: Ecosystem Services. 2016 ; Vol. 17. pp. 152-162.
@article{801f863572cc4bda84f48f87ba5a2111,
title = "Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery?",
abstract = "Whilst a number of studies have examined the effects of biodiversity conservation on the delivery of ecosystem services, they are often limited in the scope of the ecosystem services (ES) assessed and can suffer from confounding spatial issues. This paper examines the impacts of nature conservation on the delivery of a full suite of ES across nine case studies in the UK, using expert opinion. The case studies covered a range of habitats and explore the delivery of ES from a ‘protected site’ and a comparable ‘non-protected’ site. By conducting pair-wise comparisons of ES delivery between comparable sites our study attempts to mitigate confounding cause and effect factors in relation to spatial context in correlative studies. The analysis showed that protected sites deliver higher levels of ecosystem services than non-protected sites, with the main differences being in the cultural and regulating ecosystem services. Against expectations, there was no consistent negative impact of protection on provisioning services across these case studies. Whilst the analysis demonstrated general patterns in ES delivery between protected and non-protected sites, the individual responses in each case study highlights the importance of the local social, biophysical, economic and temporal context of individual protected areas and the associated management.",
keywords = "biodiversity conservation, conservation designation, ecosystem services, expert opinion, protected areas",
author = "A. Eastwood and R. Brooker and Irvine, {R. J.} and R.R.E. Artz and L.R. Norton and J.M. Bullock and L. Ross and D. Fielding and S. Ramsay and J. Roberts and W. Anderson and D. Dugan and S. Cooksley and Pakeman, {Robin J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "152--162",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B. V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery?

AU - Eastwood, A.

AU - Brooker, R.

AU - Irvine, R. J.

AU - Artz, R.R.E.

AU - Norton, L.R.

AU - Bullock, J.M.

AU - Ross, L.

AU - Fielding, D.

AU - Ramsay, S.

AU - Roberts, J.

AU - Anderson, W.

AU - Dugan, D.

AU - Cooksley, S.

AU - Pakeman, Robin J.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Whilst a number of studies have examined the effects of biodiversity conservation on the delivery of ecosystem services, they are often limited in the scope of the ecosystem services (ES) assessed and can suffer from confounding spatial issues. This paper examines the impacts of nature conservation on the delivery of a full suite of ES across nine case studies in the UK, using expert opinion. The case studies covered a range of habitats and explore the delivery of ES from a ‘protected site’ and a comparable ‘non-protected’ site. By conducting pair-wise comparisons of ES delivery between comparable sites our study attempts to mitigate confounding cause and effect factors in relation to spatial context in correlative studies. The analysis showed that protected sites deliver higher levels of ecosystem services than non-protected sites, with the main differences being in the cultural and regulating ecosystem services. Against expectations, there was no consistent negative impact of protection on provisioning services across these case studies. Whilst the analysis demonstrated general patterns in ES delivery between protected and non-protected sites, the individual responses in each case study highlights the importance of the local social, biophysical, economic and temporal context of individual protected areas and the associated management.

AB - Whilst a number of studies have examined the effects of biodiversity conservation on the delivery of ecosystem services, they are often limited in the scope of the ecosystem services (ES) assessed and can suffer from confounding spatial issues. This paper examines the impacts of nature conservation on the delivery of a full suite of ES across nine case studies in the UK, using expert opinion. The case studies covered a range of habitats and explore the delivery of ES from a ‘protected site’ and a comparable ‘non-protected’ site. By conducting pair-wise comparisons of ES delivery between comparable sites our study attempts to mitigate confounding cause and effect factors in relation to spatial context in correlative studies. The analysis showed that protected sites deliver higher levels of ecosystem services than non-protected sites, with the main differences being in the cultural and regulating ecosystem services. Against expectations, there was no consistent negative impact of protection on provisioning services across these case studies. Whilst the analysis demonstrated general patterns in ES delivery between protected and non-protected sites, the individual responses in each case study highlights the importance of the local social, biophysical, economic and temporal context of individual protected areas and the associated management.

KW - biodiversity conservation

KW - conservation designation

KW - ecosystem services

KW - expert opinion

KW - protected areas

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 152

EP - 162

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -