Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the ‘real world’ has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively-measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life.
Methods: A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior.
Results: When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67% higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95% CI [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95% CI [0.71, 1.46].
Conclusions: Real-time variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-364
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume36
Issue number4
Early online date13 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Snacks
Longitudinal Studies
Executive Function
Drive
Reaction Time
Linear Models
Cross-Sectional Studies
Eating

Keywords

  • executive function
  • inhibitory control
  • snacking
  • ecological momentary assessment 

Cite this

Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study. / Powell, Daniel J H; McMinn, David; Allan, Julia L.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 04.2017, p. 356-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a744e2da9d846ee951adc34bc6c75e9,
title = "Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study",
abstract = "Objective: Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the ‘real world’ has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively-measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life.Methods: A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior.Results: When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67{\%} higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95{\%} CI [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95{\%} CI [0.71, 1.46].Conclusions: Real-time variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions.",
keywords = "executive function, inhibitory control, snacking , ecological momentary assessment ",
author = "Powell, {Daniel J H} and David McMinn and Allan, {Julia L.}",
note = "The study was funded by the Scottish Government, Rural and Environmental Science & Analytical Services (RESAS) division. The study was conducted as part of Theme 7: Healthy Safe Diets (work package 7.1: Consumer Choice, Diet, and Health).",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/hea0000471",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "356--364",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study

AU - Powell, Daniel J H

AU - McMinn, David

AU - Allan, Julia L.

N1 - The study was funded by the Scottish Government, Rural and Environmental Science & Analytical Services (RESAS) division. The study was conducted as part of Theme 7: Healthy Safe Diets (work package 7.1: Consumer Choice, Diet, and Health).

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Objective: Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the ‘real world’ has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively-measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life.Methods: A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior.Results: When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67% higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95% CI [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95% CI [0.71, 1.46].Conclusions: Real-time variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions.

AB - Objective: Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the ‘real world’ has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively-measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life.Methods: A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior.Results: When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67% higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95% CI [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95% CI [0.71, 1.46].Conclusions: Real-time variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions.

KW - executive function

KW - inhibitory control

KW - snacking

KW - ecological momentary assessment 

U2 - 10.1037/hea0000471

DO - 10.1037/hea0000471

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 356

EP - 364

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 4

ER -