Does Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery Offer Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes?

Rosaria Scarpinata, Emad H Aly

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic rectal surgery continues to be challenging, especially in low rectal cancers, because the technique has several limitations. Robotic rectal surgery could potentially address these limitations. However, it still remains unclear whether robotic surgery should be accepted as the new standard treatment in rectal cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the available literature to assess if robotic rectal surgery offers improved early postoperative outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.

DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted following the search of electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar) for the period 2007 to 2011 by using the key words "rectal surgery," "laparoscopic," "robotic."

STUDY SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on laparoscopic and robotic resection for extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal rectal cancer were included in the review process; all studies on colonic cancer and benign disease were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic vs standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the assessment of whether robotic rectal cancer surgery provides improved short-term outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.

RESULTS: Robotic rectal surgery was associated with increased cost and operating time, but lower conversion rates, even in obese individuals, distal rectal tumors, and patients who had preoperative chemoradiotherapy regardless of the experience of the surgeon. There is also marginally better outcome in anastomotic leak rates, circumferential resection margin positivity, and perseveration of autonomic function, but this did not reach statistical significance.

LIMITATIONS: This review has some limitations because it relies on the analysis of data collected from various nonrandomized controlled trials with variable quality and different methodology.

CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that robotic rectal surgery could potentially offer better short-term outcomes especially when applied in selected patients. Obesity, male sex, preoperative radiotherapy, and tumors in the lower two-thirds of the rectum may represent selection criteria for robotic surgery to justify its increased cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-262
Number of pages10
JournalDiseases of the Colon & Rectum
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Robotics
Rectal Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Anastomotic Leak
Chemoradiotherapy
Rectum
PubMed
Colonic Neoplasms
Patient Selection
Radiotherapy
Obesity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

Keywords

  • Rectal surgery
  • Laparoscopic
  • Robotic

Cite this

Does Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery Offer Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes? / Scarpinata, Rosaria; Aly, Emad H.

In: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Vol. 56, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 253-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0e2985c8e7ba44d5b8d0e83c632adde5,
title = "Does Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery Offer Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic rectal surgery continues to be challenging, especially in low rectal cancers, because the technique has several limitations. Robotic rectal surgery could potentially address these limitations. However, it still remains unclear whether robotic surgery should be accepted as the new standard treatment in rectal cancer surgery.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the available literature to assess if robotic rectal surgery offers improved early postoperative outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted following the search of electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar) for the period 2007 to 2011 by using the key words {"}rectal surgery,{"} {"}laparoscopic,{"} {"}robotic.{"}STUDY SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on laparoscopic and robotic resection for extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal rectal cancer were included in the review process; all studies on colonic cancer and benign disease were excluded.INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic vs standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the assessment of whether robotic rectal cancer surgery provides improved short-term outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.RESULTS: Robotic rectal surgery was associated with increased cost and operating time, but lower conversion rates, even in obese individuals, distal rectal tumors, and patients who had preoperative chemoradiotherapy regardless of the experience of the surgeon. There is also marginally better outcome in anastomotic leak rates, circumferential resection margin positivity, and perseveration of autonomic function, but this did not reach statistical significance.LIMITATIONS: This review has some limitations because it relies on the analysis of data collected from various nonrandomized controlled trials with variable quality and different methodology.CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that robotic rectal surgery could potentially offer better short-term outcomes especially when applied in selected patients. Obesity, male sex, preoperative radiotherapy, and tumors in the lower two-thirds of the rectum may represent selection criteria for robotic surgery to justify its increased cost.",
keywords = "Rectal surgery, Laparoscopic, Robotic",
author = "Rosaria Scarpinata and Aly, {Emad H}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182694595",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "253--262",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon & Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery Offer Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes?

AU - Scarpinata, Rosaria

AU - Aly, Emad H

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic rectal surgery continues to be challenging, especially in low rectal cancers, because the technique has several limitations. Robotic rectal surgery could potentially address these limitations. However, it still remains unclear whether robotic surgery should be accepted as the new standard treatment in rectal cancer surgery.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the available literature to assess if robotic rectal surgery offers improved early postoperative outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted following the search of electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar) for the period 2007 to 2011 by using the key words "rectal surgery," "laparoscopic," "robotic."STUDY SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on laparoscopic and robotic resection for extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal rectal cancer were included in the review process; all studies on colonic cancer and benign disease were excluded.INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic vs standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the assessment of whether robotic rectal cancer surgery provides improved short-term outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.RESULTS: Robotic rectal surgery was associated with increased cost and operating time, but lower conversion rates, even in obese individuals, distal rectal tumors, and patients who had preoperative chemoradiotherapy regardless of the experience of the surgeon. There is also marginally better outcome in anastomotic leak rates, circumferential resection margin positivity, and perseveration of autonomic function, but this did not reach statistical significance.LIMITATIONS: This review has some limitations because it relies on the analysis of data collected from various nonrandomized controlled trials with variable quality and different methodology.CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that robotic rectal surgery could potentially offer better short-term outcomes especially when applied in selected patients. Obesity, male sex, preoperative radiotherapy, and tumors in the lower two-thirds of the rectum may represent selection criteria for robotic surgery to justify its increased cost.

AB - BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic rectal surgery continues to be challenging, especially in low rectal cancers, because the technique has several limitations. Robotic rectal surgery could potentially address these limitations. However, it still remains unclear whether robotic surgery should be accepted as the new standard treatment in rectal cancer surgery.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the available literature to assess if robotic rectal surgery offers improved early postoperative outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted following the search of electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar) for the period 2007 to 2011 by using the key words "rectal surgery," "laparoscopic," "robotic."STUDY SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on laparoscopic and robotic resection for extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal rectal cancer were included in the review process; all studies on colonic cancer and benign disease were excluded.INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic vs standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the assessment of whether robotic rectal cancer surgery provides improved short-term outcomes in comparison with standard laparoscopic rectal surgery.RESULTS: Robotic rectal surgery was associated with increased cost and operating time, but lower conversion rates, even in obese individuals, distal rectal tumors, and patients who had preoperative chemoradiotherapy regardless of the experience of the surgeon. There is also marginally better outcome in anastomotic leak rates, circumferential resection margin positivity, and perseveration of autonomic function, but this did not reach statistical significance.LIMITATIONS: This review has some limitations because it relies on the analysis of data collected from various nonrandomized controlled trials with variable quality and different methodology.CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that robotic rectal surgery could potentially offer better short-term outcomes especially when applied in selected patients. Obesity, male sex, preoperative radiotherapy, and tumors in the lower two-thirds of the rectum may represent selection criteria for robotic surgery to justify its increased cost.

KW - Rectal surgery

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Robotic

U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182694595

DO - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182694595

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23303155

VL - 56

SP - 253

EP - 262

JO - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 2

ER -