Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes?

Josephine Reuther* (Corresponding Author), Ramakrishna Chakravarthi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The tendency to prioritize information related to the self (or socially salient information) has been established for several cognitive tasks. However, earlier studies on this question suffered from confounds such as familiarity and intimacy. Recently, a series of studies overcame this limitation using newly learnt associations between geometric shapes and identities. Results from these studies have been argued to show that self-prioritization affects perceptual processing. In two studies, we replicated and extended the original shape-identity association paradigm to test an alternative hypothesis that self-prioritization does not affect perceptual processes but arises from potential memory differences introduced during the formation of associations. We found that induced memory differences lead to response patterns similar to those that have been attributed to changes in the perceptual domain. However, even extended learning undertaken to equate memory for various identity-based associations did not eliminate the effects of self-prioritization, leaving the question open if the differences are cognitive or perceptual in nature. The current evidence can be explained both in terms of memory differences and perceptual effects. Hence, we strongly recommend that the existence of perceptual effects of self-prioritization should be investigated directly rather than through changes in reaction times in match–non-match tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-398
Number of pages18
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume25
Issue number1-3
Early online date18 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Learning
Perceptual Processes
Recognition (Psychology)
Salient Information
Paradigm
Intimacy
Familiarity

Keywords

  • associative learning
  • self-reference
  • self-prioritization
  • memory
  • perception

Cite this

Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes? / Reuther, Josephine (Corresponding Author); Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 25, No. 1-3, 2017, p. 381-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f221b8dcc1a340e3b4f40033295b6691,
title = "Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes?",
abstract = "The tendency to prioritize information related to the self (or socially salient information) has been established for several cognitive tasks. However, earlier studies on this question suffered from confounds such as familiarity and intimacy. Recently, a series of studies overcame this limitation using newly learnt associations between geometric shapes and identities. Results from these studies have been argued to show that self-prioritization affects perceptual processing. In two studies, we replicated and extended the original shape-identity association paradigm to test an alternative hypothesis that self-prioritization does not affect perceptual processes but arises from potential memory differences introduced during the formation of associations. We found that induced memory differences lead to response patterns similar to those that have been attributed to changes in the perceptual domain. However, even extended learning undertaken to equate memory for various identity-based associations did not eliminate the effects of self-prioritization, leaving the question open if the differences are cognitive or perceptual in nature. The current evidence can be explained both in terms of memory differences and perceptual effects. Hence, we strongly recommend that the existence of perceptual effects of self-prioritization should be investigated directly rather than through changes in reaction times in match–non-match tasks.",
keywords = "associative learning, self-reference, self-prioritization, memory, perception",
author = "Josephine Reuther and Ramakrishna Chakravarthi",
note = "This study is based on a proposal pre-submitted to Visual Cognition, where the study design and analysis plan was registered before data collection. We thank Margaret Jackson for pointers on the memory literature and Sandie Cleland for providing a list of non-words. Further, we thank Aleksandar Visokomogilski for his advice on HDDM, as well as Tanya Bhayani and Malwina Filipczuk for their help with data collection.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "381--398",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes?

AU - Reuther, Josephine

AU - Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna

N1 - This study is based on a proposal pre-submitted to Visual Cognition, where the study design and analysis plan was registered before data collection. We thank Margaret Jackson for pointers on the memory literature and Sandie Cleland for providing a list of non-words. Further, we thank Aleksandar Visokomogilski for his advice on HDDM, as well as Tanya Bhayani and Malwina Filipczuk for their help with data collection.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The tendency to prioritize information related to the self (or socially salient information) has been established for several cognitive tasks. However, earlier studies on this question suffered from confounds such as familiarity and intimacy. Recently, a series of studies overcame this limitation using newly learnt associations between geometric shapes and identities. Results from these studies have been argued to show that self-prioritization affects perceptual processing. In two studies, we replicated and extended the original shape-identity association paradigm to test an alternative hypothesis that self-prioritization does not affect perceptual processes but arises from potential memory differences introduced during the formation of associations. We found that induced memory differences lead to response patterns similar to those that have been attributed to changes in the perceptual domain. However, even extended learning undertaken to equate memory for various identity-based associations did not eliminate the effects of self-prioritization, leaving the question open if the differences are cognitive or perceptual in nature. The current evidence can be explained both in terms of memory differences and perceptual effects. Hence, we strongly recommend that the existence of perceptual effects of self-prioritization should be investigated directly rather than through changes in reaction times in match–non-match tasks.

AB - The tendency to prioritize information related to the self (or socially salient information) has been established for several cognitive tasks. However, earlier studies on this question suffered from confounds such as familiarity and intimacy. Recently, a series of studies overcame this limitation using newly learnt associations between geometric shapes and identities. Results from these studies have been argued to show that self-prioritization affects perceptual processing. In two studies, we replicated and extended the original shape-identity association paradigm to test an alternative hypothesis that self-prioritization does not affect perceptual processes but arises from potential memory differences introduced during the formation of associations. We found that induced memory differences lead to response patterns similar to those that have been attributed to changes in the perceptual domain. However, even extended learning undertaken to equate memory for various identity-based associations did not eliminate the effects of self-prioritization, leaving the question open if the differences are cognitive or perceptual in nature. The current evidence can be explained both in terms of memory differences and perceptual effects. Hence, we strongly recommend that the existence of perceptual effects of self-prioritization should be investigated directly rather than through changes in reaction times in match–non-match tasks.

KW - associative learning

KW - self-reference

KW - self-prioritization

KW - memory

KW - perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019582886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813

DO - 10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 381

EP - 398

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 1-3

ER -