Dog noise as a risk factor for hearing loss among police dog handlers

A Reid, Finlay Dick, Sean Semple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim To determine the sources of noise exposure among police dog handlers and to examine whether these levels might lead to noise-induced hearing loss.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at four Royal Air Force bases using a noise survey, a postal questionnaire and medical record review. The noise survey was conducted following task analysis. We surveyed police dog handlers and a comparison group of police who had never been dog handlers, using a postal questionnaire on noise exposures and confounders. Audiometric and otological data were extracted from medical records.
Results The noise survey revealed significant exposures due to dogs, travelling in vans and aircraft noise during foot patrol. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 56% (29 police dog handlers, 24 police officers). Five subjects (9.4%) had age-corrected hearing loss exceeding 10 dB, averaged over the 4 and 6 kHz frequencies, affecting the left ear only, but there were no differences between dog handlers and controls.
Conclusion Although the measured noise exposures of police dog handlers did not exceed current legal limits, the noise levels at times are such that the proposed Physical Agents (Noise) Directive has implications for employers who use dogs for security purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-539
Number of pages5
JournalOccupational Medicine
Volume54
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

Keywords

  • noise
  • noise-induced hearing loss
  • police dog

Cite this

Dog noise as a risk factor for hearing loss among police dog handlers. / Reid, A ; Dick, Finlay; Semple, Sean.

In: Occupational Medicine, Vol. 54, No. 8, 12.2004, p. 535-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reid, A ; Dick, Finlay ; Semple, Sean. / Dog noise as a risk factor for hearing loss among police dog handlers. In: Occupational Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 54, No. 8. pp. 535-539.
@article{d03f898676254551a0a6e683bc6e7878,
title = "Dog noise as a risk factor for hearing loss among police dog handlers",
abstract = "Aim To determine the sources of noise exposure among police dog handlers and to examine whether these levels might lead to noise-induced hearing loss. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at four Royal Air Force bases using a noise survey, a postal questionnaire and medical record review. The noise survey was conducted following task analysis. We surveyed police dog handlers and a comparison group of police who had never been dog handlers, using a postal questionnaire on noise exposures and confounders. Audiometric and otological data were extracted from medical records. Results The noise survey revealed significant exposures due to dogs, travelling in vans and aircraft noise during foot patrol. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 56{\%} (29 police dog handlers, 24 police officers). Five subjects (9.4{\%}) had age-corrected hearing loss exceeding 10 dB, averaged over the 4 and 6 kHz frequencies, affecting the left ear only, but there were no differences between dog handlers and controls. Conclusion Although the measured noise exposures of police dog handlers did not exceed current legal limits, the noise levels at times are such that the proposed Physical Agents (Noise) Directive has implications for employers who use dogs for security purposes.",
keywords = "noise, noise-induced hearing loss, police dog",
author = "A Reid and Finlay Dick and Sean Semple",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/occmed/kqh119",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "535--539",
journal = "Occupational Medicine",
issn = "0962-7480",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dog noise as a risk factor for hearing loss among police dog handlers

AU - Reid, A

AU - Dick, Finlay

AU - Semple, Sean

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Aim To determine the sources of noise exposure among police dog handlers and to examine whether these levels might lead to noise-induced hearing loss. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at four Royal Air Force bases using a noise survey, a postal questionnaire and medical record review. The noise survey was conducted following task analysis. We surveyed police dog handlers and a comparison group of police who had never been dog handlers, using a postal questionnaire on noise exposures and confounders. Audiometric and otological data were extracted from medical records. Results The noise survey revealed significant exposures due to dogs, travelling in vans and aircraft noise during foot patrol. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 56% (29 police dog handlers, 24 police officers). Five subjects (9.4%) had age-corrected hearing loss exceeding 10 dB, averaged over the 4 and 6 kHz frequencies, affecting the left ear only, but there were no differences between dog handlers and controls. Conclusion Although the measured noise exposures of police dog handlers did not exceed current legal limits, the noise levels at times are such that the proposed Physical Agents (Noise) Directive has implications for employers who use dogs for security purposes.

AB - Aim To determine the sources of noise exposure among police dog handlers and to examine whether these levels might lead to noise-induced hearing loss. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at four Royal Air Force bases using a noise survey, a postal questionnaire and medical record review. The noise survey was conducted following task analysis. We surveyed police dog handlers and a comparison group of police who had never been dog handlers, using a postal questionnaire on noise exposures and confounders. Audiometric and otological data were extracted from medical records. Results The noise survey revealed significant exposures due to dogs, travelling in vans and aircraft noise during foot patrol. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 56% (29 police dog handlers, 24 police officers). Five subjects (9.4%) had age-corrected hearing loss exceeding 10 dB, averaged over the 4 and 6 kHz frequencies, affecting the left ear only, but there were no differences between dog handlers and controls. Conclusion Although the measured noise exposures of police dog handlers did not exceed current legal limits, the noise levels at times are such that the proposed Physical Agents (Noise) Directive has implications for employers who use dogs for security purposes.

KW - noise

KW - noise-induced hearing loss

KW - police dog

U2 - 10.1093/occmed/kqh119

DO - 10.1093/occmed/kqh119

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 535

EP - 539

JO - Occupational Medicine

JF - Occupational Medicine

SN - 0962-7480

IS - 8

ER -