Doing Justice to the Levinas-Derrida Connection: A response to Mark Dooley

Robert Christopher Plant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Mark Dooley has recently argued (principally against Simon Critchley) that the attempt to establish too strong a ‘connection’ between Jacques Derrida and Emmanuel Levinas not only distorts crucial disparities between their respective philosophies, it also contaminates Derrida’s recent work with Levinas’s inherent ‘political naivety’. In short, on Dooley’s reading, Levinas is only of ‘inspirational value’ for Derrida. I am not concerned with defending Critchley’s own reading of the ‘Derrida–Levinas connection’. My objective is rather to demonstrate, first, the way in which Dooley’s argument hinges upon a misreading of Levinas and Derrida, and, second, why Derrida’s recent thinking is in fact fundamentally Levinasian.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-450
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophy & Social Criticism
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003


  • contingency
  • guilt
  • Holocaust
  • hospitality
  • institutions
  • nature
  • suffering
  • third party
  • violence


Dive into the research topics of 'Doing Justice to the Levinas-Derrida Connection: A response to Mark Dooley'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this