Doing Justice to the Levinas-Derrida Connection: A response to Mark Dooley

Robert Christopher Plant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mark Dooley has recently argued (principally against Simon Critchley) that the attempt to establish too strong a ‘connection’ between Jacques Derrida and Emmanuel Levinas not only distorts crucial disparities between their respective philosophies, it also contaminates Derrida’s recent work with Levinas’s inherent ‘political naivety’. In short, on Dooley’s reading, Levinas is only of ‘inspirational value’ for Derrida. I am not concerned with defending Critchley’s own reading of the ‘Derrida–Levinas connection’. My objective is rather to demonstrate, first, the way in which Dooley’s argument hinges upon a misreading of Levinas and Derrida, and, second, why Derrida’s recent thinking is in fact fundamentally Levinasian.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-450
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophy & Social Criticism
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • contingency
  • guilt
  • Holocaust
  • hospitality
  • institutions
  • nature
  • suffering
  • third party
  • violence

Cite this