Dose area product values of fluoroscopically guided pain management procedures: Comparison of a Belgian teaching hospital with national diagnostic reference levels

Nicolas Hustinx, Arnaud Steyaert, Bernard le Polain de Waroux, Patrice Forget

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2011, national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were proposed for pain management fluoroscopic procedures in Belgium. The primary goal of this work is to compare the dose area product values (DAP) recorded at the Saint-Luc University Hospital to these DRLs. From 2012 to 2015, 7664 interventional pain management procedures (4740 epidural, 2097 medial branch and 807 transforaminal infiltrations) were performed. Uni/multivariable analyses were done regarding the influence of different factors. The fluoroscopy duration and the DAP are lower to the DRLs (p < 0.001). From 7644 procedures’ DAP, 1431 (18.7%) were higher than the DRLs: 1397 epidural (29.5%), 16 medial branch (0.8%) and 18 transforaminal infiltrations (2.2%) (p < 0.001 between procedures). The main factor that significantly modifies DAP, as duration, is the practitioner. Additionally, we obtained [IQR: 25–75] values for epidural [0.0174–0.055 mGy m2], medial branch block [0.0194–0.0472] and transforaminal infiltrations [0.0499–0.1067 mGy m2] (p < 0.05 vs. DRLs, respectively, 0.05, 0.25 and 0.3 mGy m2). Systematic use of contrast confirmation significantly increases DAP (p < 0.001). This retrospective analysis shows differences in DAP, mainly driven by the practitioner. This suggests the existence of modifiable factors. Programs aiming to determine these factors to reduce this DAP are justified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-274
Number of pages4
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume179
Issue number3
Early online date8 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Teaching Hospitals
Saints
Fluoroscopy
Belgium

Cite this

Dose area product values of fluoroscopically guided pain management procedures : Comparison of a Belgian teaching hospital with national diagnostic reference levels. / Hustinx, Nicolas; Steyaert, Arnaud; de Waroux, Bernard le Polain; Forget, Patrice.

In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 179, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 271-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1371928f5be94560b06633dbfe7c0cf0,
title = "Dose area product values of fluoroscopically guided pain management procedures: Comparison of a Belgian teaching hospital with national diagnostic reference levels",
abstract = "In 2011, national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were proposed for pain management fluoroscopic procedures in Belgium. The primary goal of this work is to compare the dose area product values (DAP) recorded at the Saint-Luc University Hospital to these DRLs. From 2012 to 2015, 7664 interventional pain management procedures (4740 epidural, 2097 medial branch and 807 transforaminal infiltrations) were performed. Uni/multivariable analyses were done regarding the influence of different factors. The fluoroscopy duration and the DAP are lower to the DRLs (p < 0.001). From 7644 procedures’ DAP, 1431 (18.7{\%}) were higher than the DRLs: 1397 epidural (29.5{\%}), 16 medial branch (0.8{\%}) and 18 transforaminal infiltrations (2.2{\%}) (p < 0.001 between procedures). The main factor that significantly modifies DAP, as duration, is the practitioner. Additionally, we obtained [IQR: 25–75] values for epidural [0.0174–0.055 mGy m2], medial branch block [0.0194–0.0472] and transforaminal infiltrations [0.0499–0.1067 mGy m2] (p < 0.05 vs. DRLs, respectively, 0.05, 0.25 and 0.3 mGy m2). Systematic use of contrast confirmation significantly increases DAP (p < 0.001). This retrospective analysis shows differences in DAP, mainly driven by the practitioner. This suggests the existence of modifiable factors. Programs aiming to determine these factors to reduce this DAP are justified.",
author = "Nicolas Hustinx and Arnaud Steyaert and {de Waroux}, {Bernard le Polain} and Patrice Forget",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncx271",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
pages = "271--274",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
issn = "1742-3406",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dose area product values of fluoroscopically guided pain management procedures

T2 - Comparison of a Belgian teaching hospital with national diagnostic reference levels

AU - Hustinx, Nicolas

AU - Steyaert, Arnaud

AU - de Waroux, Bernard le Polain

AU - Forget, Patrice

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - In 2011, national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were proposed for pain management fluoroscopic procedures in Belgium. The primary goal of this work is to compare the dose area product values (DAP) recorded at the Saint-Luc University Hospital to these DRLs. From 2012 to 2015, 7664 interventional pain management procedures (4740 epidural, 2097 medial branch and 807 transforaminal infiltrations) were performed. Uni/multivariable analyses were done regarding the influence of different factors. The fluoroscopy duration and the DAP are lower to the DRLs (p < 0.001). From 7644 procedures’ DAP, 1431 (18.7%) were higher than the DRLs: 1397 epidural (29.5%), 16 medial branch (0.8%) and 18 transforaminal infiltrations (2.2%) (p < 0.001 between procedures). The main factor that significantly modifies DAP, as duration, is the practitioner. Additionally, we obtained [IQR: 25–75] values for epidural [0.0174–0.055 mGy m2], medial branch block [0.0194–0.0472] and transforaminal infiltrations [0.0499–0.1067 mGy m2] (p < 0.05 vs. DRLs, respectively, 0.05, 0.25 and 0.3 mGy m2). Systematic use of contrast confirmation significantly increases DAP (p < 0.001). This retrospective analysis shows differences in DAP, mainly driven by the practitioner. This suggests the existence of modifiable factors. Programs aiming to determine these factors to reduce this DAP are justified.

AB - In 2011, national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were proposed for pain management fluoroscopic procedures in Belgium. The primary goal of this work is to compare the dose area product values (DAP) recorded at the Saint-Luc University Hospital to these DRLs. From 2012 to 2015, 7664 interventional pain management procedures (4740 epidural, 2097 medial branch and 807 transforaminal infiltrations) were performed. Uni/multivariable analyses were done regarding the influence of different factors. The fluoroscopy duration and the DAP are lower to the DRLs (p < 0.001). From 7644 procedures’ DAP, 1431 (18.7%) were higher than the DRLs: 1397 epidural (29.5%), 16 medial branch (0.8%) and 18 transforaminal infiltrations (2.2%) (p < 0.001 between procedures). The main factor that significantly modifies DAP, as duration, is the practitioner. Additionally, we obtained [IQR: 25–75] values for epidural [0.0174–0.055 mGy m2], medial branch block [0.0194–0.0472] and transforaminal infiltrations [0.0499–0.1067 mGy m2] (p < 0.05 vs. DRLs, respectively, 0.05, 0.25 and 0.3 mGy m2). Systematic use of contrast confirmation significantly increases DAP (p < 0.001). This retrospective analysis shows differences in DAP, mainly driven by the practitioner. This suggests the existence of modifiable factors. Programs aiming to determine these factors to reduce this DAP are justified.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/dose-area-product-values-fluoroscopically-guided-pain-management-procedures-comparison-belgian-teach

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncx271

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncx271

M3 - Article

VL - 179

SP - 271

EP - 274

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

SN - 1742-3406

IS - 3

ER -