Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction

The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons

Ioannis Theodossiou, Georgios A. Panos

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the “relative deprivation”, or positive the “cognitive effect”. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country’s economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, “relative deprivation”, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country’s environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of “peer earnings” dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCentre for European Labour Market Research
Number of pages39
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Publication series

NameUniversity of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series
No.01
Volume2007
ISSN (Print)0143-4543

Fingerprint

Aspiration
Job satisfaction
Peers
Relative deprivation
Well-being
Political environment
Economic environment
Interdependent preferences
Social comparison
Financial distress
Employees

Keywords

  • earnings
  • job satisfaction
  • financial vulnerability
  • reference group

Cite this

Theodossiou, I., & Panos, G. A. (2007). Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series; Vol. 2007, No. 01). Centre for European Labour Market Research.

Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction : The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons. / Theodossiou, Ioannis; Panos, Georgios A.

Centre for European Labour Market Research, 2007. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series; Vol. 2007, No. 01).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Theodossiou, I & Panos, GA 2007 'Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons' University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series, no. 01, vol. 2007, Centre for European Labour Market Research.
Theodossiou I, Panos GA. Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons. Centre for European Labour Market Research. 2007 Jan. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series; 01).
Theodossiou, Ioannis ; Panos, Georgios A. / Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction : The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons. Centre for European Labour Market Research, 2007. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series; 01).
@techreport{9d88ad401ada4004ba1b17080e140f13,
title = "Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons",
abstract = "Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the “relative deprivation”, or positive the “cognitive effect”. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country’s economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, “relative deprivation”, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country’s environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of “peer earnings” dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept.",
keywords = "earnings, job satisfaction, financial vulnerability, reference group",
author = "Ioannis Theodossiou and Panos, {Georgios A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
language = "English",
series = "University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Centre for European Labour Market Research",
number = "01",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Centre for European Labour Market Research",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction

T2 - The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons

AU - Theodossiou, Ioannis

AU - Panos, Georgios A.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the “relative deprivation”, or positive the “cognitive effect”. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country’s economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, “relative deprivation”, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country’s environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of “peer earnings” dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept.

AB - Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the “relative deprivation”, or positive the “cognitive effect”. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country’s economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, “relative deprivation”, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country’s environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of “peer earnings” dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept.

KW - earnings

KW - job satisfaction

KW - financial vulnerability

KW - reference group

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series

BT - Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction

PB - Centre for European Labour Market Research

ER -