Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons

Ioannis Theodossiou, Georgios A. Panos

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the “relative deprivation”, or positive the “cognitive effect”. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country’s economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, “relative deprivation”, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country’s environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of “peer earnings” dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCentre for European Labour Market Research
Number of pages39
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Publication series

NameUniversity of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series
No.01
Volume2007
ISSN (Print)0143-4543

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • earnings
  • job satisfaction
  • financial vulnerability
  • reference group

Cite this

Theodossiou, I., & Panos, G. A. (2007). Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series; Vol. 2007, No. 01). Centre for European Labour Market Research.