Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Interactions between boats and cetaceans influence the behaviour of animals. Cetaceans will tend to evade boat interactions and these evasion tactics will lead to altered activity budgets (Williams et al., 2002, 2006; Nowacek et al., 2001, Lusseau, 2003, 2004). In some instances, those influences can have severe impacts for individuals and their populations (Lusseau, 2004, 2005a; Williams et al., 2006; Lusseau et al., 2006; Bejder et al., 2006). However, we currently have no way to determine a priori when boat-interaction effects will lead to biological impacts and when those will have population consequences. This lack of predictive power means that we lack the scientific foundations to manage the current rapid growth of the whale-watching industry and therefore the industry's sustainability is being questioned (Corkeron, 2004; Higham & Lusseau, 2007). In this chapter, I develop a conceptual understanding of how the natural constraints that populations face can be critical factors increasing the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. This conceptualization is leading to the development of a number of predictions that I encourage the scientific community to test. Each of these hypotheses is highlighted in their relevant section and I also bring them together in the conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWhale-Watching
Subtitle of host publicationSustainable Tourism and Ecological Management
EditorsJames Higham, Lars Bejder, Rob Williams
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages229-241
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9781139018166, 9780521195973
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Whales
whales
Ships
boats
Population
Industry
industry
Animal Behavior
Budgets
animal behavior
prediction
Growth
testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Lusseau, D. (2014). Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. In J. Higham, L. Bejder, & R. Williams (Eds.), Whale-Watching: Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management (pp. 229-241). [16] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018166.019

Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. / Lusseau, David.

Whale-Watching: Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management. ed. / James Higham; Lars Bejder; Rob Williams. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 229-241 16.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lusseau, D 2014, Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. in J Higham, L Bejder & R Williams (eds), Whale-Watching: Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management., 16, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018166.019
Lusseau D. Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. In Higham J, Bejder L, Williams R, editors, Whale-Watching: Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 229-241. 16 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018166.019
Lusseau, David. / Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. Whale-Watching: Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management. editor / James Higham ; Lars Bejder ; Rob Williams. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 229-241
@inbook{8c0ff438f1184bdc88cc31158347b4ca,
title = "Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances",
abstract = "Interactions between boats and cetaceans influence the behaviour of animals. Cetaceans will tend to evade boat interactions and these evasion tactics will lead to altered activity budgets (Williams et al., 2002, 2006; Nowacek et al., 2001, Lusseau, 2003, 2004). In some instances, those influences can have severe impacts for individuals and their populations (Lusseau, 2004, 2005a; Williams et al., 2006; Lusseau et al., 2006; Bejder et al., 2006). However, we currently have no way to determine a priori when boat-interaction effects will lead to biological impacts and when those will have population consequences. This lack of predictive power means that we lack the scientific foundations to manage the current rapid growth of the whale-watching industry and therefore the industry's sustainability is being questioned (Corkeron, 2004; Higham & Lusseau, 2007). In this chapter, I develop a conceptual understanding of how the natural constraints that populations face can be critical factors increasing the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. This conceptualization is leading to the development of a number of predictions that I encourage the scientific community to test. Each of these hypotheses is highlighted in their relevant section and I also bring them together in the conclusion.",
author = "David Lusseau",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139018166.019",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781139018166",
pages = "229--241",
editor = "James Higham and Lars Bejder and Rob Williams",
booktitle = "Whale-Watching",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances

AU - Lusseau, David

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Interactions between boats and cetaceans influence the behaviour of animals. Cetaceans will tend to evade boat interactions and these evasion tactics will lead to altered activity budgets (Williams et al., 2002, 2006; Nowacek et al., 2001, Lusseau, 2003, 2004). In some instances, those influences can have severe impacts for individuals and their populations (Lusseau, 2004, 2005a; Williams et al., 2006; Lusseau et al., 2006; Bejder et al., 2006). However, we currently have no way to determine a priori when boat-interaction effects will lead to biological impacts and when those will have population consequences. This lack of predictive power means that we lack the scientific foundations to manage the current rapid growth of the whale-watching industry and therefore the industry's sustainability is being questioned (Corkeron, 2004; Higham & Lusseau, 2007). In this chapter, I develop a conceptual understanding of how the natural constraints that populations face can be critical factors increasing the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. This conceptualization is leading to the development of a number of predictions that I encourage the scientific community to test. Each of these hypotheses is highlighted in their relevant section and I also bring them together in the conclusion.

AB - Interactions between boats and cetaceans influence the behaviour of animals. Cetaceans will tend to evade boat interactions and these evasion tactics will lead to altered activity budgets (Williams et al., 2002, 2006; Nowacek et al., 2001, Lusseau, 2003, 2004). In some instances, those influences can have severe impacts for individuals and their populations (Lusseau, 2004, 2005a; Williams et al., 2006; Lusseau et al., 2006; Bejder et al., 2006). However, we currently have no way to determine a priori when boat-interaction effects will lead to biological impacts and when those will have population consequences. This lack of predictive power means that we lack the scientific foundations to manage the current rapid growth of the whale-watching industry and therefore the industry's sustainability is being questioned (Corkeron, 2004; Higham & Lusseau, 2007). In this chapter, I develop a conceptual understanding of how the natural constraints that populations face can be critical factors increasing the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. This conceptualization is leading to the development of a number of predictions that I encourage the scientific community to test. Each of these hypotheses is highlighted in their relevant section and I also bring them together in the conclusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973461692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139018166.019

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139018166.019

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84973461692

SN - 9781139018166

SN - 9780521195973

SP - 229

EP - 241

BT - Whale-Watching

A2 - Higham, James

A2 - Bejder, Lars

A2 - Williams, Rob

PB - Cambridge University Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -