Educated search-A generic platform for partial modification at conceptual design phase of multidisciplinary problems

Alireza Maheri, Askin Isikveren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a goal programming algorithm utilising a weight-free aggregate function for producing enhanced design alternatives and a knowledge-based procedure for the selection of the final solution from a pool of enhanced alternatives. Normally, in a multi-disciplinary design problem several teams of designers with different preference and background knowledge are involved in the decision making processes, such as constructing aggregate functions for multi-objective optimisation and trade-off study towards selecting the final solution. In constructing an aggregate function, designers need to identify how important each objective is with respect to the other objectives. However, in the absence of a final decision maker with expertise in all disciplines, the predicates such as ?as important as? or ?more important than? cannot be used to compare objectives from different disciplines, and therefore the establishment of a weighted aggregate function is not viable. Introducing the concepts of unsatisfactoriness and tolerated margin, ?how important is a design quality with respect to other design qualities? is replaced with ?to what extent can the unsatisfactoriness of a design quality be tolerated?. This removes the predicament arising from the usual subjective decision making when forming an aggregate function and also transforms the final solution selection from a negotiation process to a straightforward and knowledge based procedure. A software tool comprising of two modules, a multi-deme genetic algorithm, for producing enhanced alternatives, and an assessment module, which includes visualisation, ranking and filtering facilities, is developed and its performance is shown using an illustrative multi-disciplinary design space.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)991-1004
Number of pages14
JournalComputer-Aided Design
Volume45
Issue number6
Early online date11 Feb 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Conceptual design
Decision making
Multiobjective optimization
Visualization
Genetic algorithms

Keywords

  • Multi-disciplinary design
  • Educated search
  • Design modification
  • Design decision support system
  • Multi-deme genetic algorithm

Cite this

Educated search-A generic platform for partial modification at conceptual design phase of multidisciplinary problems. / Maheri, Alireza; Isikveren, Askin.

In: Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 45, No. 6, 01.06.2013, p. 991-1004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a51f54a640f949408e5afc6fc389b160,
title = "Educated search-A generic platform for partial modification at conceptual design phase of multidisciplinary problems",
abstract = "This paper presents a goal programming algorithm utilising a weight-free aggregate function for producing enhanced design alternatives and a knowledge-based procedure for the selection of the final solution from a pool of enhanced alternatives. Normally, in a multi-disciplinary design problem several teams of designers with different preference and background knowledge are involved in the decision making processes, such as constructing aggregate functions for multi-objective optimisation and trade-off study towards selecting the final solution. In constructing an aggregate function, designers need to identify how important each objective is with respect to the other objectives. However, in the absence of a final decision maker with expertise in all disciplines, the predicates such as ?as important as? or ?more important than? cannot be used to compare objectives from different disciplines, and therefore the establishment of a weighted aggregate function is not viable. Introducing the concepts of unsatisfactoriness and tolerated margin, ?how important is a design quality with respect to other design qualities? is replaced with ?to what extent can the unsatisfactoriness of a design quality be tolerated?. This removes the predicament arising from the usual subjective decision making when forming an aggregate function and also transforms the final solution selection from a negotiation process to a straightforward and knowledge based procedure. A software tool comprising of two modules, a multi-deme genetic algorithm, for producing enhanced alternatives, and an assessment module, which includes visualisation, ranking and filtering facilities, is developed and its performance is shown using an illustrative multi-disciplinary design space.",
keywords = "Multi-disciplinary design, Educated search, Design modification, Design decision support system, Multi-deme genetic algorithm",
author = "Alireza Maheri and Askin Isikveren",
note = "The research reported in this paper was supported by the EU FP6 funded project, SimSAC (Simulating Aircraft Stability and Control Characteristics for Use in Conceptual Design) under Contract number AST5-CT-2006-030838.",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cad.2013.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "991--1004",
journal = "Computer-Aided Design",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educated search-A generic platform for partial modification at conceptual design phase of multidisciplinary problems

AU - Maheri, Alireza

AU - Isikveren, Askin

N1 - The research reported in this paper was supported by the EU FP6 funded project, SimSAC (Simulating Aircraft Stability and Control Characteristics for Use in Conceptual Design) under Contract number AST5-CT-2006-030838.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - This paper presents a goal programming algorithm utilising a weight-free aggregate function for producing enhanced design alternatives and a knowledge-based procedure for the selection of the final solution from a pool of enhanced alternatives. Normally, in a multi-disciplinary design problem several teams of designers with different preference and background knowledge are involved in the decision making processes, such as constructing aggregate functions for multi-objective optimisation and trade-off study towards selecting the final solution. In constructing an aggregate function, designers need to identify how important each objective is with respect to the other objectives. However, in the absence of a final decision maker with expertise in all disciplines, the predicates such as ?as important as? or ?more important than? cannot be used to compare objectives from different disciplines, and therefore the establishment of a weighted aggregate function is not viable. Introducing the concepts of unsatisfactoriness and tolerated margin, ?how important is a design quality with respect to other design qualities? is replaced with ?to what extent can the unsatisfactoriness of a design quality be tolerated?. This removes the predicament arising from the usual subjective decision making when forming an aggregate function and also transforms the final solution selection from a negotiation process to a straightforward and knowledge based procedure. A software tool comprising of two modules, a multi-deme genetic algorithm, for producing enhanced alternatives, and an assessment module, which includes visualisation, ranking and filtering facilities, is developed and its performance is shown using an illustrative multi-disciplinary design space.

AB - This paper presents a goal programming algorithm utilising a weight-free aggregate function for producing enhanced design alternatives and a knowledge-based procedure for the selection of the final solution from a pool of enhanced alternatives. Normally, in a multi-disciplinary design problem several teams of designers with different preference and background knowledge are involved in the decision making processes, such as constructing aggregate functions for multi-objective optimisation and trade-off study towards selecting the final solution. In constructing an aggregate function, designers need to identify how important each objective is with respect to the other objectives. However, in the absence of a final decision maker with expertise in all disciplines, the predicates such as ?as important as? or ?more important than? cannot be used to compare objectives from different disciplines, and therefore the establishment of a weighted aggregate function is not viable. Introducing the concepts of unsatisfactoriness and tolerated margin, ?how important is a design quality with respect to other design qualities? is replaced with ?to what extent can the unsatisfactoriness of a design quality be tolerated?. This removes the predicament arising from the usual subjective decision making when forming an aggregate function and also transforms the final solution selection from a negotiation process to a straightforward and knowledge based procedure. A software tool comprising of two modules, a multi-deme genetic algorithm, for producing enhanced alternatives, and an assessment module, which includes visualisation, ranking and filtering facilities, is developed and its performance is shown using an illustrative multi-disciplinary design space.

KW - Multi-disciplinary design

KW - Educated search

KW - Design modification

KW - Design decision support system

KW - Multi-deme genetic algorithm

U2 - 10.1016/j.cad.2013.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cad.2013.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 991

EP - 1004

JO - Computer-Aided Design

JF - Computer-Aided Design

IS - 6

ER -