Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats

R. Arlettaz, Gareth Jones, Paul Adrian Racey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    136 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Bats that capture animal prey from substrates often emit characteristic echolocation calls that are short-duration, frequency-modulated (FM) and broadband(1). Such calls seem to be suited to locating prey in uncluttered habitats, including flying prey, but may be less effective for finding prey among cluttered backgrounds because echoes reflecting from the substrate mask the acoustic signature of prey(2-4). Perhaps these call designs serve primarily for spatial orientation(5-7). Furthermore, it has been unclear whether the acoustic image conveyed by FM echoes enables fine texture discrimination(3,8,9), or whether gleaning bats that forage in echo-cluttering environments must locate prey by using other cues, such as prey-generated sounds(5-7,10-13). Here we show that two species of insectivorous gleaning bats perform badly when compelled to detect silent and immobile prey in clutter, but are very efficient at capturing noisy prey items among highly cluttered backgrounds, and both dead or live prey in uncluttered habitats. These findings suggest that the short, broadband FM echolocation calls associated with gleaning bats are not adapted to detecting prey in clutter.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)742-745
    Number of pages3
    JournalNature
    Volume414
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2001

    Keywords

    • SPECIES MYOTIS-MYOTIS
    • LONG-EARED BATS
    • ECHOLOCATION SIGNALS
    • PLECOTUS-AURITUS
    • FEEDING-BEHAVIOR
    • GLEANING BAT
    • DISCRIMINATION
    • BLYTHII
    • EVOTIS
    • MOTHS

    Cite this

    Arlettaz, R., Jones, G., & Racey, P. A. (2001). Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats. Nature, 414, 742-745. https://doi.org/10.1038/414742a

    Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats. / Arlettaz, R.; Jones, Gareth; Racey, Paul Adrian.

    In: Nature, Vol. 414, 12.2001, p. 742-745.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Arlettaz, R, Jones, G & Racey, PA 2001, 'Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats' Nature, vol. 414, pp. 742-745. https://doi.org/10.1038/414742a
    Arlettaz, R. ; Jones, Gareth ; Racey, Paul Adrian. / Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats. In: Nature. 2001 ; Vol. 414. pp. 742-745.
    @article{d879fbfaffdc4d07bd3e1312c9060616,
    title = "Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats",
    abstract = "Bats that capture animal prey from substrates often emit characteristic echolocation calls that are short-duration, frequency-modulated (FM) and broadband(1). Such calls seem to be suited to locating prey in uncluttered habitats, including flying prey, but may be less effective for finding prey among cluttered backgrounds because echoes reflecting from the substrate mask the acoustic signature of prey(2-4). Perhaps these call designs serve primarily for spatial orientation(5-7). Furthermore, it has been unclear whether the acoustic image conveyed by FM echoes enables fine texture discrimination(3,8,9), or whether gleaning bats that forage in echo-cluttering environments must locate prey by using other cues, such as prey-generated sounds(5-7,10-13). Here we show that two species of insectivorous gleaning bats perform badly when compelled to detect silent and immobile prey in clutter, but are very efficient at capturing noisy prey items among highly cluttered backgrounds, and both dead or live prey in uncluttered habitats. These findings suggest that the short, broadband FM echolocation calls associated with gleaning bats are not adapted to detecting prey in clutter.",
    keywords = "SPECIES MYOTIS-MYOTIS, LONG-EARED BATS, ECHOLOCATION SIGNALS, PLECOTUS-AURITUS, FEEDING-BEHAVIOR, GLEANING BAT, DISCRIMINATION, BLYTHII, EVOTIS, MOTHS",
    author = "R. Arlettaz and Gareth Jones and Racey, {Paul Adrian}",
    year = "2001",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1038/414742a",
    language = "English",
    volume = "414",
    pages = "742--745",
    journal = "Nature",
    issn = "0028-0836",
    publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats

    AU - Arlettaz, R.

    AU - Jones, Gareth

    AU - Racey, Paul Adrian

    PY - 2001/12

    Y1 - 2001/12

    N2 - Bats that capture animal prey from substrates often emit characteristic echolocation calls that are short-duration, frequency-modulated (FM) and broadband(1). Such calls seem to be suited to locating prey in uncluttered habitats, including flying prey, but may be less effective for finding prey among cluttered backgrounds because echoes reflecting from the substrate mask the acoustic signature of prey(2-4). Perhaps these call designs serve primarily for spatial orientation(5-7). Furthermore, it has been unclear whether the acoustic image conveyed by FM echoes enables fine texture discrimination(3,8,9), or whether gleaning bats that forage in echo-cluttering environments must locate prey by using other cues, such as prey-generated sounds(5-7,10-13). Here we show that two species of insectivorous gleaning bats perform badly when compelled to detect silent and immobile prey in clutter, but are very efficient at capturing noisy prey items among highly cluttered backgrounds, and both dead or live prey in uncluttered habitats. These findings suggest that the short, broadband FM echolocation calls associated with gleaning bats are not adapted to detecting prey in clutter.

    AB - Bats that capture animal prey from substrates often emit characteristic echolocation calls that are short-duration, frequency-modulated (FM) and broadband(1). Such calls seem to be suited to locating prey in uncluttered habitats, including flying prey, but may be less effective for finding prey among cluttered backgrounds because echoes reflecting from the substrate mask the acoustic signature of prey(2-4). Perhaps these call designs serve primarily for spatial orientation(5-7). Furthermore, it has been unclear whether the acoustic image conveyed by FM echoes enables fine texture discrimination(3,8,9), or whether gleaning bats that forage in echo-cluttering environments must locate prey by using other cues, such as prey-generated sounds(5-7,10-13). Here we show that two species of insectivorous gleaning bats perform badly when compelled to detect silent and immobile prey in clutter, but are very efficient at capturing noisy prey items among highly cluttered backgrounds, and both dead or live prey in uncluttered habitats. These findings suggest that the short, broadband FM echolocation calls associated with gleaning bats are not adapted to detecting prey in clutter.

    KW - SPECIES MYOTIS-MYOTIS

    KW - LONG-EARED BATS

    KW - ECHOLOCATION SIGNALS

    KW - PLECOTUS-AURITUS

    KW - FEEDING-BEHAVIOR

    KW - GLEANING BAT

    KW - DISCRIMINATION

    KW - BLYTHII

    KW - EVOTIS

    KW - MOTHS

    U2 - 10.1038/414742a

    DO - 10.1038/414742a

    M3 - Article

    VL - 414

    SP - 742

    EP - 745

    JO - Nature

    JF - Nature

    SN - 0028-0836

    ER -