Effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial thickness, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth in anovulatory women: systematic review and meta-analysis

M. A. Gadalla* (Corresponding Author), S. Huang, R. Wang, R. J. Norman, S. A. Abdullah, A. M. El Saman, A. M. Ismail, M. van Wely, B. W.J. Mol

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the impact of clomiphene citrate (CC) vs other drug regimens on mid-cycle endometrial thickness (EMT), ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates in women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II ovulatory disorders. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) and the non-MEDLINE subset of PubMed from inception to December 2016 and cross-checked references of relevant articles. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CC used alone vs other drug regimens for ovulation induction in women with WHO group II anovulation. Outcomes were mid-cycle EMT, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates. We pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous variables (EMT) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI for binary variables (ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates). Results: We retrieved 1718 articles of which 33 RCTs (4349 women, 7210 ovulation induction cycles) were included. In 15 RCTs that compared CC with letrozole, EMT was lower in the CC group (1957 women, 3892 cycles; WMD, −1.39; 95% CI, −2.27 to −0.51; I2 = 100%), ovulation rates after CC and letrozole were comparable (1710 women, 3217 cycles; RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.04; I2 = 47%), while CC led to a lower pregnancy rate (1957 women, 3892 cycles; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63–0.95; I2 = 43%) and a lower live birth rate (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49–0.98; I2 = 35%). In two RCTs that compared CC with CC plus metformin, EMT, ovulation and pregnancy rates were comparable (101 women, 140 cycles; WMD, −0.23; 95% CI, −0.92 to 0.45; I2 = 78%; RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67–1.06; I2 = 0%; and RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.33–1.87; I2 = 0%). In three studies that compared CC with CC plus N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), EMT was lower in the CC group (340 women, 300 cycles; WMD, −1.51; 95% CI, −1.98 to −1.04; I2 = 45%). In two studies that compared CC with CC + nitric oxide (NO) donor, EMT was lower in the CC group (120 women, 304 cycles; WMD, −1.75; 95% CI, −2.08 to −1.41; I2 = 0%). Compared with CC plus NO donor or NAC, CC showed statistically significant lower ovulation and pregnancy rates. Compared with tamoxifen in three studies, CC showed a tendency towards lower EMT (571 women, 844 cycles; WMD, −1.34; 95% CI, −2.70 to 0.01; I2 = 96%) with comparable ovulation and pregnancy rates. Conclusions: In women with WHO group II ovulatory disorders, ovulation induction with CC might result in lower EMT than other ovulation induction regimens. Whether the lower EMT caused the lower pregnancy and live birth rates remains to be elucidated. Letrozole seems to be beneficial for these women. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution as the quality of evidence was very low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-76
Number of pages13
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume51
Issue number1
Early online date3 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Data Availability Statement

SUPPORTING INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET The following supporting information may be found in the online version of this article: Table S1 Detailed search strategy Table S2 List of excluded studies Table S3 Summary of results of meta-analysis Figure S1Assessment of risk of bias. (a) Risk of bias summary for each included study: low risk of bias (+); high risk of bias (−); unclear risk of bias (?).(b) Risk of bias graph for each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. Figure S2 Sensitivity analysis for endometrial thickness in comparison between CC and letrozole, CC + metformin and tamoxifen. Figure S3 Additional funnel plots for CC v letrozole. (a) Live birth. (b) Pregnancy rate. (c) Ovulation rate. Figure S4 Funnel plots for CC vs letrozole. (a) Endometrial thickness. (b) Ovulation rate. (c) Pregnancy rate.

Keywords

  • anovulation
  • clomiphene
  • endometrial thickness
  • ovulation induction
  • PCOS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial thickness, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth in anovulatory women: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this