TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness (Delta PP and PVI) during Trendelenburg position
AU - Ghoundiwal, Djamal
AU - Delaporte, Amelie
AU - Bidgoli, Javad
AU - Forget, Patrice
AU - Fils, Jean François
AU - Van Der Linden, Philippe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Background and Aims: Pulse pressure variation (?PP) is considered as one of the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation. Pleth Variability Index (PVI) has been proposed as a noninvasive alternative. However, pneumoperitoneum has been recently suggested as a limitation to their interpretation. The aim of this study was to compare changes in ?PP and PVI related to autotransfusion associated with a Trendelenburg maneuver before and during pneumoperitoneum. Methods: 50 patients undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in this prospective observational study. All patients were equipped with an invasive radial artery catheter and a PVI probe. After obtaining a stable signal with both ?PP and PVI, baseline values were recorded, before and after head-down tilts of 10°, with or without abdominal insufflation (10-12 mmHg). All measurements were made before any fluid challenge under standardized anaesthesia, while patients were paralyzed and mechanically ventilated with 8 mL/kg tidal volume. Results: Changes in ?PP and PVI associated with the Trendelenburg maneuver before and after insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum were significantly different (P < 0.001). In baseline conditions, the Trendelenburg maneuver was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate while mean arterial pressure remained unchanged. Both ?PP and PVI decreased. After insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum, the Trendelenburg maneuver was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate and ?PP and an increase in mean arterial pressure while PVI remained unchanged. Conclusion: Pneumoperitoneum did not alter the response of ?PP to autotransfusion associated with the Trendelenburg maneuver, which was not the case for the PVI. This latter decreased during Trendelenburg maneuver performed alone and remained unchanged during Trendelenburg maneuver performed after insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum.
AB - Background and Aims: Pulse pressure variation (?PP) is considered as one of the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation. Pleth Variability Index (PVI) has been proposed as a noninvasive alternative. However, pneumoperitoneum has been recently suggested as a limitation to their interpretation. The aim of this study was to compare changes in ?PP and PVI related to autotransfusion associated with a Trendelenburg maneuver before and during pneumoperitoneum. Methods: 50 patients undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in this prospective observational study. All patients were equipped with an invasive radial artery catheter and a PVI probe. After obtaining a stable signal with both ?PP and PVI, baseline values were recorded, before and after head-down tilts of 10°, with or without abdominal insufflation (10-12 mmHg). All measurements were made before any fluid challenge under standardized anaesthesia, while patients were paralyzed and mechanically ventilated with 8 mL/kg tidal volume. Results: Changes in ?PP and PVI associated with the Trendelenburg maneuver before and after insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum were significantly different (P < 0.001). In baseline conditions, the Trendelenburg maneuver was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate while mean arterial pressure remained unchanged. Both ?PP and PVI decreased. After insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum, the Trendelenburg maneuver was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate and ?PP and an increase in mean arterial pressure while PVI remained unchanged. Conclusion: Pneumoperitoneum did not alter the response of ?PP to autotransfusion associated with the Trendelenburg maneuver, which was not the case for the PVI. This latter decreased during Trendelenburg maneuver performed alone and remained unchanged during Trendelenburg maneuver performed after insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum.
KW - Dynamic variables
KW - fluid responsiveness
KW - pneumoperitoneum
KW - Trendelenburg position
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085901294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/sja.SJA_737_19
DO - 10.4103/sja.SJA_737_19
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085901294
VL - 14
SP - 323
EP - 328
JO - Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
SN - 1658-354X
IS - 3
ER -