Effect of weather data aggregation on regional crop simulation for different crops, production conditions, and response variables

Gang Zhao, Holger Hoffman, Lenny G. van Bussell, Andreas Enders, Xenia Specka, Carmen Sosa, Jagadeesh Yeluripati, Fulu Tao, Julie Constantin, Helene Raynal, Edmar Teixeira, Balázs Grosz, Luca Doro, Zhigan Zhao, Claas Nendel, Ralf Kiese, Henrik Eckersten, Edwin Haas, Eline Vanuytrecht, Enli Wang & 16 others Matthias Kuhnert, Giacomo Trombi, Marco Moriondo, Marco Bindi, Elisabet Lewan, Michaela Bach, Kurt-Christian Kersebaum, Reimund Rotter, Pier Paolo Roggero, Daniel Wallach, Davide Cammarano, Senthold Asseng, Gunther Krauss, Stefan Siebert, Thomas Gaiser, Frank Ewert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We assessed the weather data aggregation effect (DAE) on the simulation of cropping systems for different crops, response variables, and production conditions. Using 13 process based crop models and the ensemble mean, we simulated 30 yr continuous cropping systems for 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize) under 3 production conditions for the state of North
Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The DAE was evaluated for 5 weather data resolutions (i.e. 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 km) for 3 response variables including yield, growing season evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency. Five metrics, viz. the spatial bias (Δ), average absolute deviation (AAD), relative AAD, root mean squared error (RMSE), and relative RMSE, were used to evaluate the DAE
on both the input weather data and simulated results. For weather data, we found that data aggregation narrowed the spatial variability but widened the Δ, especially across mountainous areas. The DAE on loss of spatial heterogeneity and hotspots was stronger than on the average changes over the region. The DAE increased when coarsening the spatial resolution of the input weather data. The DAE varied considerably across different models, but changed only slightly for different production conditions and crops. We conclude that if spatially detailed information is essential for local management decision, higher resolution is desirable to adequately capture the spatial variability
for heterogeneous regions. The required resolution depends on the choice of the model as well as the environmental condition of the study area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-157
Number of pages17
JournalClimate Research
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

crop production
Crops
Agglomeration
weather
crop
simulation
Evapotranspiration
Coarsening
effect
continuous cropping
silage
water use efficiency
Water
evapotranspiration
cropping practice
spatial resolution
growing season
wheat
maize
environmental conditions

Keywords

  • crop model
  • model comparison
  • spatial resolution
  • data aggregation
  • spatial heterogeneity
  • scaling

Cite this

Effect of weather data aggregation on regional crop simulation for different crops, production conditions, and response variables. / Zhao, Gang; Hoffman, Holger; van Bussell, Lenny G.; Enders, Andreas; Specka, Xenia; Sosa, Carmen ; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh; Tao, Fulu; Constantin, Julie; Raynal, Helene; Teixeira, Edmar; Grosz, Balázs; Doro, Luca; Zhao, Zhigan; Nendel, Claas; Kiese, Ralf ; Eckersten, Henrik; Haas, Edwin; Vanuytrecht, Eline; Wang, Enli; Kuhnert, Matthias; Trombi, Giacomo; Moriondo, Marco; Bindi, Marco; Lewan, Elisabet; Bach, Michaela; Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian; Rotter, Reimund; Roggero, Pier Paolo; Wallach, Daniel; Cammarano, Davide; Asseng, Senthold; Krauss, Gunther ; Siebert, Stefan; Gaiser, Thomas; Ewert, Frank.

In: Climate Research, Vol. 65, 28.09.2015, p. 141-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, G, Hoffman, H, van Bussell, LG, Enders, A, Specka, X, Sosa, C, Yeluripati, J, Tao, F, Constantin, J, Raynal, H, Teixeira, E, Grosz, B, Doro, L, Zhao, Z, Nendel, C, Kiese, R, Eckersten, H, Haas, E, Vanuytrecht, E, Wang, E, Kuhnert, M, Trombi, G, Moriondo, M, Bindi, M, Lewan, E, Bach, M, Kersebaum, K-C, Rotter, R, Roggero, PP, Wallach, D, Cammarano, D, Asseng, S, Krauss, G, Siebert, S, Gaiser, T & Ewert, F 2015, 'Effect of weather data aggregation on regional crop simulation for different crops, production conditions, and response variables', Climate Research, vol. 65, pp. 141-157. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01301
Zhao, Gang ; Hoffman, Holger ; van Bussell, Lenny G. ; Enders, Andreas ; Specka, Xenia ; Sosa, Carmen ; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh ; Tao, Fulu ; Constantin, Julie ; Raynal, Helene ; Teixeira, Edmar ; Grosz, Balázs ; Doro, Luca ; Zhao, Zhigan ; Nendel, Claas ; Kiese, Ralf ; Eckersten, Henrik ; Haas, Edwin ; Vanuytrecht, Eline ; Wang, Enli ; Kuhnert, Matthias ; Trombi, Giacomo ; Moriondo, Marco ; Bindi, Marco ; Lewan, Elisabet ; Bach, Michaela ; Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian ; Rotter, Reimund ; Roggero, Pier Paolo ; Wallach, Daniel ; Cammarano, Davide ; Asseng, Senthold ; Krauss, Gunther ; Siebert, Stefan ; Gaiser, Thomas ; Ewert, Frank. / Effect of weather data aggregation on regional crop simulation for different crops, production conditions, and response variables. In: Climate Research. 2015 ; Vol. 65. pp. 141-157.
@article{806db75cab694364811f7b32736397e5,
title = "Effect of weather data aggregation on regional crop simulation for different crops, production conditions, and response variables",
abstract = "We assessed the weather data aggregation effect (DAE) on the simulation of cropping systems for different crops, response variables, and production conditions. Using 13 process based crop models and the ensemble mean, we simulated 30 yr continuous cropping systems for 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize) under 3 production conditions for the state of NorthRhine-Westphalia, Germany. The DAE was evaluated for 5 weather data resolutions (i.e. 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 km) for 3 response variables including yield, growing season evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency. Five metrics, viz. the spatial bias (Δ), average absolute deviation (AAD), relative AAD, root mean squared error (RMSE), and relative RMSE, were used to evaluate the DAEon both the input weather data and simulated results. For weather data, we found that data aggregation narrowed the spatial variability but widened the Δ, especially across mountainous areas. The DAE on loss of spatial heterogeneity and hotspots was stronger than on the average changes over the region. The DAE increased when coarsening the spatial resolution of the input weather data. The DAE varied considerably across different models, but changed only slightly for different production conditions and crops. We conclude that if spatially detailed information is essential for local management decision, higher resolution is desirable to adequately capture the spatial variabilityfor heterogeneous regions. The required resolution depends on the choice of the model as well as the environmental condition of the study area.",
keywords = "crop model, model comparison, spatial resolution, data aggregation, spatial heterogeneity, scaling",
author = "Gang Zhao and Holger Hoffman and {van Bussell}, {Lenny G.} and Andreas Enders and Xenia Specka and Carmen Sosa and Jagadeesh Yeluripati and Fulu Tao and Julie Constantin and Helene Raynal and Edmar Teixeira and Bal{\'a}zs Grosz and Luca Doro and Zhigan Zhao and Claas Nendel and Ralf Kiese and Henrik Eckersten and Edwin Haas and Eline Vanuytrecht and Enli Wang and Matthias Kuhnert and Giacomo Trombi and Marco Moriondo and Marco Bindi and Elisabet Lewan and Michaela Bach and Kurt-Christian Kersebaum and Reimund Rotter and Roggero, {Pier Paolo} and Daniel Wallach and Davide Cammarano and Senthold Asseng and Gunther Krauss and Stefan Siebert and Thomas Gaiser and Frank Ewert",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3354/cr01301",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "141--157",
journal = "Climate Research",
issn = "0936-577X",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of weather data aggregation on regional crop simulation for different crops, production conditions, and response variables

AU - Zhao, Gang

AU - Hoffman, Holger

AU - van Bussell, Lenny G.

AU - Enders, Andreas

AU - Specka, Xenia

AU - Sosa, Carmen

AU - Yeluripati, Jagadeesh

AU - Tao, Fulu

AU - Constantin, Julie

AU - Raynal, Helene

AU - Teixeira, Edmar

AU - Grosz, Balázs

AU - Doro, Luca

AU - Zhao, Zhigan

AU - Nendel, Claas

AU - Kiese, Ralf

AU - Eckersten, Henrik

AU - Haas, Edwin

AU - Vanuytrecht, Eline

AU - Wang, Enli

AU - Kuhnert, Matthias

AU - Trombi, Giacomo

AU - Moriondo, Marco

AU - Bindi, Marco

AU - Lewan, Elisabet

AU - Bach, Michaela

AU - Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian

AU - Rotter, Reimund

AU - Roggero, Pier Paolo

AU - Wallach, Daniel

AU - Cammarano, Davide

AU - Asseng, Senthold

AU - Krauss, Gunther

AU - Siebert, Stefan

AU - Gaiser, Thomas

AU - Ewert, Frank

PY - 2015/9/28

Y1 - 2015/9/28

N2 - We assessed the weather data aggregation effect (DAE) on the simulation of cropping systems for different crops, response variables, and production conditions. Using 13 process based crop models and the ensemble mean, we simulated 30 yr continuous cropping systems for 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize) under 3 production conditions for the state of NorthRhine-Westphalia, Germany. The DAE was evaluated for 5 weather data resolutions (i.e. 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 km) for 3 response variables including yield, growing season evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency. Five metrics, viz. the spatial bias (Δ), average absolute deviation (AAD), relative AAD, root mean squared error (RMSE), and relative RMSE, were used to evaluate the DAEon both the input weather data and simulated results. For weather data, we found that data aggregation narrowed the spatial variability but widened the Δ, especially across mountainous areas. The DAE on loss of spatial heterogeneity and hotspots was stronger than on the average changes over the region. The DAE increased when coarsening the spatial resolution of the input weather data. The DAE varied considerably across different models, but changed only slightly for different production conditions and crops. We conclude that if spatially detailed information is essential for local management decision, higher resolution is desirable to adequately capture the spatial variabilityfor heterogeneous regions. The required resolution depends on the choice of the model as well as the environmental condition of the study area.

AB - We assessed the weather data aggregation effect (DAE) on the simulation of cropping systems for different crops, response variables, and production conditions. Using 13 process based crop models and the ensemble mean, we simulated 30 yr continuous cropping systems for 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize) under 3 production conditions for the state of NorthRhine-Westphalia, Germany. The DAE was evaluated for 5 weather data resolutions (i.e. 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 km) for 3 response variables including yield, growing season evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency. Five metrics, viz. the spatial bias (Δ), average absolute deviation (AAD), relative AAD, root mean squared error (RMSE), and relative RMSE, were used to evaluate the DAEon both the input weather data and simulated results. For weather data, we found that data aggregation narrowed the spatial variability but widened the Δ, especially across mountainous areas. The DAE on loss of spatial heterogeneity and hotspots was stronger than on the average changes over the region. The DAE increased when coarsening the spatial resolution of the input weather data. The DAE varied considerably across different models, but changed only slightly for different production conditions and crops. We conclude that if spatially detailed information is essential for local management decision, higher resolution is desirable to adequately capture the spatial variabilityfor heterogeneous regions. The required resolution depends on the choice of the model as well as the environmental condition of the study area.

KW - crop model

KW - model comparison

KW - spatial resolution

KW - data aggregation

KW - spatial heterogeneity

KW - scaling

U2 - 10.3354/cr01301

DO - 10.3354/cr01301

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 141

EP - 157

JO - Climate Research

JF - Climate Research

SN - 0936-577X

ER -