Effect of Well Pattern and Injection Well Type on CO2-Assisted Gravity Drainage Enhanced Oil Recovery

P. S. Jadhawar*, H. K. Sarma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fundamental understanding and application of process parameters in numerical simulation that leads to optimized gravity drainage oil recovery at field scale is still a major challenge. Reservoir simulations studying the effects of well patterns and type of gas injection wells have not been reported so far. In first ever attempt, the mechanistic benefits of production strategy on gravity drainage oil recovery are identified in this paper. Effects of irregular and regular well patterns and vertical and horizontal gas injection wells are investigated using a fully compositional 3D reservoir model in secondary immiscible and miscible modes under the conditions of voidage balance, constant pressure of injection and production wells and injection rates below the critical rate. Regular well pattern provided longer oil production time at a constant rate until CO2 breakthrough compared to irregular well pattern. It then dropped almost vertically at the same cumulative oil recovery even at higher production rates. However, gravity drainage oil recovery was higher at higher rate combination after CO2 breakthrough. Results also suggested that the regular pattern could result in horizontal CO2 floodfront parallel to the horizontal producers, maintaining reservoir pressure, thus optimizing the oil recovery by additional 2.5% OOIP. Vertical injection and horizontal production wells in both the immiscible and miscible modes provided nearly identical cumulative gravity drainage oil recovery compared to the combination of horizontal injection and production wells in the regular well pattern. This suggests that the type of injection wells may not be a significant factor to impact the CO2-assisted gravity drainage mechanism. Results obtained herein would help in the optimization of CO2-assisted gravity drainage EOR process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-94
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Volume98-99
Early online date4 Oct 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

enhanced oil recovery
Drainage
Gravitation
drainage
gravity
well
Recovery
oil
gas
oil production
simulation
effect
Oils
rate
Computer simulation

Keywords

  • CO-assisted gravity drainage
  • Fully compositional 3D reservoir simulation
  • Immiscible and miscible enhanced oil recovery
  • Injection well
  • Well pattern

Cite this

@article{554229503bac452099bb4bcd535fe266,
title = "Effect of Well Pattern and Injection Well Type on CO2-Assisted Gravity Drainage Enhanced Oil Recovery",
abstract = "Fundamental understanding and application of process parameters in numerical simulation that leads to optimized gravity drainage oil recovery at field scale is still a major challenge. Reservoir simulations studying the effects of well patterns and type of gas injection wells have not been reported so far. In first ever attempt, the mechanistic benefits of production strategy on gravity drainage oil recovery are identified in this paper. Effects of irregular and regular well patterns and vertical and horizontal gas injection wells are investigated using a fully compositional 3D reservoir model in secondary immiscible and miscible modes under the conditions of voidage balance, constant pressure of injection and production wells and injection rates below the critical rate. Regular well pattern provided longer oil production time at a constant rate until CO2 breakthrough compared to irregular well pattern. It then dropped almost vertically at the same cumulative oil recovery even at higher production rates. However, gravity drainage oil recovery was higher at higher rate combination after CO2 breakthrough. Results also suggested that the regular pattern could result in horizontal CO2 floodfront parallel to the horizontal producers, maintaining reservoir pressure, thus optimizing the oil recovery by additional 2.5{\%} OOIP. Vertical injection and horizontal production wells in both the immiscible and miscible modes provided nearly identical cumulative gravity drainage oil recovery compared to the combination of horizontal injection and production wells in the regular well pattern. This suggests that the type of injection wells may not be a significant factor to impact the CO2-assisted gravity drainage mechanism. Results obtained herein would help in the optimization of CO2-assisted gravity drainage EOR process.",
keywords = "CO-assisted gravity drainage, Fully compositional 3D reservoir simulation, Immiscible and miscible enhanced oil recovery, Injection well, Well pattern",
author = "Jadhawar, {P. S.} and Sarma, {H. K.}",
note = "Acknowledgements The results presented herein in this paper are part of PhD studies conducted at the Australian School of Petroleum (ASP), University of Adelaide, Australia. Authors would like to thank Santos Limited for its support to the Centre for Improved Oil Recovery at the Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide. First author thanks Santos Limited for sponsoring PhD studies through Post-Graduate scholarship.",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.petrol.2012.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "98-99",
pages = "83--94",
journal = "Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering",
issn = "0920-4105",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Well Pattern and Injection Well Type on CO2-Assisted Gravity Drainage Enhanced Oil Recovery

AU - Jadhawar, P. S.

AU - Sarma, H. K.

N1 - Acknowledgements The results presented herein in this paper are part of PhD studies conducted at the Australian School of Petroleum (ASP), University of Adelaide, Australia. Authors would like to thank Santos Limited for its support to the Centre for Improved Oil Recovery at the Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide. First author thanks Santos Limited for sponsoring PhD studies through Post-Graduate scholarship.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Fundamental understanding and application of process parameters in numerical simulation that leads to optimized gravity drainage oil recovery at field scale is still a major challenge. Reservoir simulations studying the effects of well patterns and type of gas injection wells have not been reported so far. In first ever attempt, the mechanistic benefits of production strategy on gravity drainage oil recovery are identified in this paper. Effects of irregular and regular well patterns and vertical and horizontal gas injection wells are investigated using a fully compositional 3D reservoir model in secondary immiscible and miscible modes under the conditions of voidage balance, constant pressure of injection and production wells and injection rates below the critical rate. Regular well pattern provided longer oil production time at a constant rate until CO2 breakthrough compared to irregular well pattern. It then dropped almost vertically at the same cumulative oil recovery even at higher production rates. However, gravity drainage oil recovery was higher at higher rate combination after CO2 breakthrough. Results also suggested that the regular pattern could result in horizontal CO2 floodfront parallel to the horizontal producers, maintaining reservoir pressure, thus optimizing the oil recovery by additional 2.5% OOIP. Vertical injection and horizontal production wells in both the immiscible and miscible modes provided nearly identical cumulative gravity drainage oil recovery compared to the combination of horizontal injection and production wells in the regular well pattern. This suggests that the type of injection wells may not be a significant factor to impact the CO2-assisted gravity drainage mechanism. Results obtained herein would help in the optimization of CO2-assisted gravity drainage EOR process.

AB - Fundamental understanding and application of process parameters in numerical simulation that leads to optimized gravity drainage oil recovery at field scale is still a major challenge. Reservoir simulations studying the effects of well patterns and type of gas injection wells have not been reported so far. In first ever attempt, the mechanistic benefits of production strategy on gravity drainage oil recovery are identified in this paper. Effects of irregular and regular well patterns and vertical and horizontal gas injection wells are investigated using a fully compositional 3D reservoir model in secondary immiscible and miscible modes under the conditions of voidage balance, constant pressure of injection and production wells and injection rates below the critical rate. Regular well pattern provided longer oil production time at a constant rate until CO2 breakthrough compared to irregular well pattern. It then dropped almost vertically at the same cumulative oil recovery even at higher production rates. However, gravity drainage oil recovery was higher at higher rate combination after CO2 breakthrough. Results also suggested that the regular pattern could result in horizontal CO2 floodfront parallel to the horizontal producers, maintaining reservoir pressure, thus optimizing the oil recovery by additional 2.5% OOIP. Vertical injection and horizontal production wells in both the immiscible and miscible modes provided nearly identical cumulative gravity drainage oil recovery compared to the combination of horizontal injection and production wells in the regular well pattern. This suggests that the type of injection wells may not be a significant factor to impact the CO2-assisted gravity drainage mechanism. Results obtained herein would help in the optimization of CO2-assisted gravity drainage EOR process.

KW - CO-assisted gravity drainage

KW - Fully compositional 3D reservoir simulation

KW - Immiscible and miscible enhanced oil recovery

KW - Injection well

KW - Well pattern

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868326162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.09.004

M3 - Article

VL - 98-99

SP - 83

EP - 94

JO - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

JF - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

SN - 0920-4105

ER -