Effects of delta-9-THC and WIN-55,212-2 on place preference in the water maze in rats

Lianne Robinson, L. Hinder, Roger Guy Pertwee, Gernot Riedel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Cannabinoids such as Delta(9)-tetrahydro-cannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) or WIN-55,212-2 (WIN-2) have psychoactive effects on cognition. As a result, the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC or WIN-2 may confound learning and memory tests with false negative results. It therefore seems advisable to assess the reinforcing properties of the drugs in the same behavioural model used for learning experiments. Objective: We therefore developed conditioned place preference protocols in the open-field water maze and tested both Delta(9)-THC (2 mg/kg) and WIN-2 (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg). Given that previous reports on cannabinoids have revealed conflicting data and that this was a novel behavioural test, we also tested the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (2.5 mg/kg). Some methodical refinements were appropriate in order to determine the behavioural strategy implemented by the animals. Methods: All animals were injected intraperitoneally 30 min prior to training/testing. In experiment 1, male hooded Lister rats injected with drug were repeatedly placed on the drug-related platform and subsequently tested for place preference. In experiment 2, rats were trained to swim to the drug platform on drug days and to the vehicle platform on vehicle days. A series of probe trials was introduced to delineate what had been learned. Experiment 3 studied the effect of WIN-2 on spatial learning in the water maze. Results: Neither WIN-2 nor Delta(9)-THC induced place preference in the water maze. When trained in the swim procedure, however, WIN-2 was neutral, but Delta(9)-THC resulted in place aversion. Conversely, diazepam consistently produced place preference in both procedures. WIN-2 (3 mg/kg), however, produced a small learning deficit in the spatial water maze task. Conclusion: It appears that the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC and WIN-2 in the doses used here are different, despite them both being agonists at cannabinoid receptors within the central nervous system. The fact that Delta(9)-THC may be aversively related to a particular context has implications for previous work reporting deficits in spatial learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-50
Number of pages10
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume166
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2003

Keywords

  • cannabinoid
  • WIN 55,212-2
  • Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC)
  • diazepam
  • place preference
  • water maze
  • rat
  • SHORT-TERM-MEMORY
  • RECEPTOR AGONIST WIN-55,212-2
  • CANNABINOID RECEPTOR
  • LIGAND ANANDAMIDE
  • ANXIOLYTIC DRUGS
  • WORKING-MEMORY
  • MOUSE-BRAIN
  • LONG-TERM
  • DIAZEPAM
  • MICE

Cite this

Effects of delta-9-THC and WIN-55,212-2 on place preference in the water maze in rats. / Robinson, Lianne; Hinder, L.; Pertwee, Roger Guy; Riedel, Gernot.

In: Psychopharmacology, Vol. 166, No. 1, 02.2003, p. 40-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d45a8875ab440b1b342a5bab50ec28b,
title = "Effects of delta-9-THC and WIN-55,212-2 on place preference in the water maze in rats",
abstract = "Rationale: Cannabinoids such as Delta(9)-tetrahydro-cannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) or WIN-55,212-2 (WIN-2) have psychoactive effects on cognition. As a result, the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC or WIN-2 may confound learning and memory tests with false negative results. It therefore seems advisable to assess the reinforcing properties of the drugs in the same behavioural model used for learning experiments. Objective: We therefore developed conditioned place preference protocols in the open-field water maze and tested both Delta(9)-THC (2 mg/kg) and WIN-2 (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg). Given that previous reports on cannabinoids have revealed conflicting data and that this was a novel behavioural test, we also tested the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (2.5 mg/kg). Some methodical refinements were appropriate in order to determine the behavioural strategy implemented by the animals. Methods: All animals were injected intraperitoneally 30 min prior to training/testing. In experiment 1, male hooded Lister rats injected with drug were repeatedly placed on the drug-related platform and subsequently tested for place preference. In experiment 2, rats were trained to swim to the drug platform on drug days and to the vehicle platform on vehicle days. A series of probe trials was introduced to delineate what had been learned. Experiment 3 studied the effect of WIN-2 on spatial learning in the water maze. Results: Neither WIN-2 nor Delta(9)-THC induced place preference in the water maze. When trained in the swim procedure, however, WIN-2 was neutral, but Delta(9)-THC resulted in place aversion. Conversely, diazepam consistently produced place preference in both procedures. WIN-2 (3 mg/kg), however, produced a small learning deficit in the spatial water maze task. Conclusion: It appears that the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC and WIN-2 in the doses used here are different, despite them both being agonists at cannabinoid receptors within the central nervous system. The fact that Delta(9)-THC may be aversively related to a particular context has implications for previous work reporting deficits in spatial learning.",
keywords = "cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), diazepam, place preference, water maze, rat, SHORT-TERM-MEMORY, RECEPTOR AGONIST WIN-55,212-2, CANNABINOID RECEPTOR, LIGAND ANANDAMIDE, ANXIOLYTIC DRUGS, WORKING-MEMORY, MOUSE-BRAIN, LONG-TERM, DIAZEPAM, MICE",
author = "Lianne Robinson and L. Hinder and Pertwee, {Roger Guy} and Gernot Riedel",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/S00213-002-1302-0",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "40--50",
journal = "Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0033-3158",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of delta-9-THC and WIN-55,212-2 on place preference in the water maze in rats

AU - Robinson, Lianne

AU - Hinder, L.

AU - Pertwee, Roger Guy

AU - Riedel, Gernot

PY - 2003/2

Y1 - 2003/2

N2 - Rationale: Cannabinoids such as Delta(9)-tetrahydro-cannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) or WIN-55,212-2 (WIN-2) have psychoactive effects on cognition. As a result, the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC or WIN-2 may confound learning and memory tests with false negative results. It therefore seems advisable to assess the reinforcing properties of the drugs in the same behavioural model used for learning experiments. Objective: We therefore developed conditioned place preference protocols in the open-field water maze and tested both Delta(9)-THC (2 mg/kg) and WIN-2 (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg). Given that previous reports on cannabinoids have revealed conflicting data and that this was a novel behavioural test, we also tested the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (2.5 mg/kg). Some methodical refinements were appropriate in order to determine the behavioural strategy implemented by the animals. Methods: All animals were injected intraperitoneally 30 min prior to training/testing. In experiment 1, male hooded Lister rats injected with drug were repeatedly placed on the drug-related platform and subsequently tested for place preference. In experiment 2, rats were trained to swim to the drug platform on drug days and to the vehicle platform on vehicle days. A series of probe trials was introduced to delineate what had been learned. Experiment 3 studied the effect of WIN-2 on spatial learning in the water maze. Results: Neither WIN-2 nor Delta(9)-THC induced place preference in the water maze. When trained in the swim procedure, however, WIN-2 was neutral, but Delta(9)-THC resulted in place aversion. Conversely, diazepam consistently produced place preference in both procedures. WIN-2 (3 mg/kg), however, produced a small learning deficit in the spatial water maze task. Conclusion: It appears that the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC and WIN-2 in the doses used here are different, despite them both being agonists at cannabinoid receptors within the central nervous system. The fact that Delta(9)-THC may be aversively related to a particular context has implications for previous work reporting deficits in spatial learning.

AB - Rationale: Cannabinoids such as Delta(9)-tetrahydro-cannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) or WIN-55,212-2 (WIN-2) have psychoactive effects on cognition. As a result, the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC or WIN-2 may confound learning and memory tests with false negative results. It therefore seems advisable to assess the reinforcing properties of the drugs in the same behavioural model used for learning experiments. Objective: We therefore developed conditioned place preference protocols in the open-field water maze and tested both Delta(9)-THC (2 mg/kg) and WIN-2 (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg). Given that previous reports on cannabinoids have revealed conflicting data and that this was a novel behavioural test, we also tested the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (2.5 mg/kg). Some methodical refinements were appropriate in order to determine the behavioural strategy implemented by the animals. Methods: All animals were injected intraperitoneally 30 min prior to training/testing. In experiment 1, male hooded Lister rats injected with drug were repeatedly placed on the drug-related platform and subsequently tested for place preference. In experiment 2, rats were trained to swim to the drug platform on drug days and to the vehicle platform on vehicle days. A series of probe trials was introduced to delineate what had been learned. Experiment 3 studied the effect of WIN-2 on spatial learning in the water maze. Results: Neither WIN-2 nor Delta(9)-THC induced place preference in the water maze. When trained in the swim procedure, however, WIN-2 was neutral, but Delta(9)-THC resulted in place aversion. Conversely, diazepam consistently produced place preference in both procedures. WIN-2 (3 mg/kg), however, produced a small learning deficit in the spatial water maze task. Conclusion: It appears that the reinforcing properties of Delta(9)-THC and WIN-2 in the doses used here are different, despite them both being agonists at cannabinoid receptors within the central nervous system. The fact that Delta(9)-THC may be aversively related to a particular context has implications for previous work reporting deficits in spatial learning.

KW - cannabinoid

KW - WIN 55,212-2

KW - Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC)

KW - diazepam

KW - place preference

KW - water maze

KW - rat

KW - SHORT-TERM-MEMORY

KW - RECEPTOR AGONIST WIN-55,212-2

KW - CANNABINOID RECEPTOR

KW - LIGAND ANANDAMIDE

KW - ANXIOLYTIC DRUGS

KW - WORKING-MEMORY

KW - MOUSE-BRAIN

KW - LONG-TERM

KW - DIAZEPAM

KW - MICE

U2 - 10.1007/S00213-002-1302-0

DO - 10.1007/S00213-002-1302-0

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 40

EP - 50

JO - Psychopharmacology

JF - Psychopharmacology

SN - 0033-3158

IS - 1

ER -