Effects of flume characteristics on the assessment of drag on flexible macrophytes and a rigid cylinder

Glenn G. Cooper, Fraser M. CallaGhan, Vladimir Ivanovich Nikora, Nicolas Lamouroux, Bernhard Statzner, Pierre Sagnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research, using rigid objects, showed that the magnitude of mean drag on submerged bodies can be influenced by the blockage ratio (ratio of the frontal projection area of an object to the wetted flume cross-sectional area). In addition, drag measurements, under similar flow conditions, are likely to be affected by other flume characteristics. These factors lead to some uncertainty in drag measurement comparisons between identical objects for a given reference flow velocity. We measured drag on three pairs of replicate objects (two types of flexible artificial macrophyte and a rigid cylinder) in two flumes differing in width (0.25 and 0.75 m). Owing to different flume widths, the blockage ratios differed between the flumes for the macrophytes (c. 7% and c. 22% at intermediate flow rates) and the cylinder (2.5% and 7.5%). For theoretically identical mean cross-sectional velocities, the between-flume difference in mean centreline channel velocities across the range of flows used in this study was 6.4%, indicating similar bulk flow conditions for the two flumes. We found no between-flume differences in drag-velocity relationships for the cylinder, whereas one macrophyte had a distinctly higher drag in the narrower flume at low approach velocities (c. 0.2 m s(-1)). This difference of drag on the macrophyte likely indicates blockage effects in the narrower flume at low velocities, when plant bending and streamlining was low. At higher approach velocities, between-flume differences in drag on the macrophytes were minor, except for one type of macrophyte that had a higher drag at the highest velocity in the wider flume (possibly related to plant reconfiguration and fluttering).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-135
Number of pages7
JournalNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Keywords

  • experimental flume width
  • blockage ratio
  • velocity gradients
  • submersible drag gauge
  • aquatic plants
  • fresh-water macrophytes
  • circular-cylinder
  • flow
  • reconfiguration
  • coefficients
  • channel

Cite this

Effects of flume characteristics on the assessment of drag on flexible macrophytes and a rigid cylinder. / Cooper, Glenn G.; CallaGhan, Fraser M.; Nikora, Vladimir Ivanovich; Lamouroux, Nicolas; Statzner, Bernhard; Sagnes, Pierre.

In: New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 129-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooper, Glenn G. ; CallaGhan, Fraser M. ; Nikora, Vladimir Ivanovich ; Lamouroux, Nicolas ; Statzner, Bernhard ; Sagnes, Pierre. / Effects of flume characteristics on the assessment of drag on flexible macrophytes and a rigid cylinder. In: New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 2007 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 129-135.
@article{795843a4bba24da8969ca09e4174b95a,
title = "Effects of flume characteristics on the assessment of drag on flexible macrophytes and a rigid cylinder",
abstract = "Previous research, using rigid objects, showed that the magnitude of mean drag on submerged bodies can be influenced by the blockage ratio (ratio of the frontal projection area of an object to the wetted flume cross-sectional area). In addition, drag measurements, under similar flow conditions, are likely to be affected by other flume characteristics. These factors lead to some uncertainty in drag measurement comparisons between identical objects for a given reference flow velocity. We measured drag on three pairs of replicate objects (two types of flexible artificial macrophyte and a rigid cylinder) in two flumes differing in width (0.25 and 0.75 m). Owing to different flume widths, the blockage ratios differed between the flumes for the macrophytes (c. 7{\%} and c. 22{\%} at intermediate flow rates) and the cylinder (2.5{\%} and 7.5{\%}). For theoretically identical mean cross-sectional velocities, the between-flume difference in mean centreline channel velocities across the range of flows used in this study was 6.4{\%}, indicating similar bulk flow conditions for the two flumes. We found no between-flume differences in drag-velocity relationships for the cylinder, whereas one macrophyte had a distinctly higher drag in the narrower flume at low approach velocities (c. 0.2 m s(-1)). This difference of drag on the macrophyte likely indicates blockage effects in the narrower flume at low velocities, when plant bending and streamlining was low. At higher approach velocities, between-flume differences in drag on the macrophytes were minor, except for one type of macrophyte that had a higher drag at the highest velocity in the wider flume (possibly related to plant reconfiguration and fluttering).",
keywords = "experimental flume width, blockage ratio, velocity gradients, submersible drag gauge, aquatic plants, fresh-water macrophytes, circular-cylinder, flow, reconfiguration, coefficients, channel",
author = "Cooper, {Glenn G.} and CallaGhan, {Fraser M.} and Nikora, {Vladimir Ivanovich} and Nicolas Lamouroux and Bernhard Statzner and Pierre Sagnes",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00288330709509901",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "129--135",
journal = "New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research",
issn = "0028-8330",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of flume characteristics on the assessment of drag on flexible macrophytes and a rigid cylinder

AU - Cooper, Glenn G.

AU - CallaGhan, Fraser M.

AU - Nikora, Vladimir Ivanovich

AU - Lamouroux, Nicolas

AU - Statzner, Bernhard

AU - Sagnes, Pierre

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Previous research, using rigid objects, showed that the magnitude of mean drag on submerged bodies can be influenced by the blockage ratio (ratio of the frontal projection area of an object to the wetted flume cross-sectional area). In addition, drag measurements, under similar flow conditions, are likely to be affected by other flume characteristics. These factors lead to some uncertainty in drag measurement comparisons between identical objects for a given reference flow velocity. We measured drag on three pairs of replicate objects (two types of flexible artificial macrophyte and a rigid cylinder) in two flumes differing in width (0.25 and 0.75 m). Owing to different flume widths, the blockage ratios differed between the flumes for the macrophytes (c. 7% and c. 22% at intermediate flow rates) and the cylinder (2.5% and 7.5%). For theoretically identical mean cross-sectional velocities, the between-flume difference in mean centreline channel velocities across the range of flows used in this study was 6.4%, indicating similar bulk flow conditions for the two flumes. We found no between-flume differences in drag-velocity relationships for the cylinder, whereas one macrophyte had a distinctly higher drag in the narrower flume at low approach velocities (c. 0.2 m s(-1)). This difference of drag on the macrophyte likely indicates blockage effects in the narrower flume at low velocities, when plant bending and streamlining was low. At higher approach velocities, between-flume differences in drag on the macrophytes were minor, except for one type of macrophyte that had a higher drag at the highest velocity in the wider flume (possibly related to plant reconfiguration and fluttering).

AB - Previous research, using rigid objects, showed that the magnitude of mean drag on submerged bodies can be influenced by the blockage ratio (ratio of the frontal projection area of an object to the wetted flume cross-sectional area). In addition, drag measurements, under similar flow conditions, are likely to be affected by other flume characteristics. These factors lead to some uncertainty in drag measurement comparisons between identical objects for a given reference flow velocity. We measured drag on three pairs of replicate objects (two types of flexible artificial macrophyte and a rigid cylinder) in two flumes differing in width (0.25 and 0.75 m). Owing to different flume widths, the blockage ratios differed between the flumes for the macrophytes (c. 7% and c. 22% at intermediate flow rates) and the cylinder (2.5% and 7.5%). For theoretically identical mean cross-sectional velocities, the between-flume difference in mean centreline channel velocities across the range of flows used in this study was 6.4%, indicating similar bulk flow conditions for the two flumes. We found no between-flume differences in drag-velocity relationships for the cylinder, whereas one macrophyte had a distinctly higher drag in the narrower flume at low approach velocities (c. 0.2 m s(-1)). This difference of drag on the macrophyte likely indicates blockage effects in the narrower flume at low velocities, when plant bending and streamlining was low. At higher approach velocities, between-flume differences in drag on the macrophytes were minor, except for one type of macrophyte that had a higher drag at the highest velocity in the wider flume (possibly related to plant reconfiguration and fluttering).

KW - experimental flume width

KW - blockage ratio

KW - velocity gradients

KW - submersible drag gauge

KW - aquatic plants

KW - fresh-water macrophytes

KW - circular-cylinder

KW - flow

KW - reconfiguration

KW - coefficients

KW - channel

U2 - 10.1080/00288330709509901

DO - 10.1080/00288330709509901

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 129

EP - 135

JO - New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research

JF - New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research

SN - 0028-8330

IS - 1

ER -