Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise

D. M. Linnane, R. M. Bracken, S. Brooks, V. M. Cox*, D. Ball

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the metabolic and performance responses to hyperthermia during high-intensity exercise. Seven males completed two 30-s cycle sprints (SpI and SpII) at an environmental temperature of 20.6 (0.3)°C [mean (SD)] with 4 min recovery between sprints. A hot or control treatment preceded the sprint exercise. For the hot trial, subjects were immersed up to the neck in hot water [43°C for 16.0 (3.2) min] prior to entering an environmental chamber [44.2 (0.8)°C for 30.7 (7.1) min]. For the control trial, subjects were seated in an empty bath (15 min) and thereafter in a normal environment [20.2 (0.6)°C for 29.0 (1.9) min]. Subjects' core temperature prior to exercise was 38.1 (0.3)°C in the hot trial and 37.1 (0.3)°C in the control trial. Mean power output (MPO) was significantly higher in the hot condition for SpI [683 (130) W hot vs 646 (119) W control (P < 0.025)]. Peak power output (PPO) tended to be higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial for SpI [1057 (260) W hot vs 990 (245) W control (P = 0.03, NS)]. These differences in power output were a consequence of a faster pedal cadence in the hot trial (P < 0.025). There were no differences in sprint performance in SpII in the hot trial compared to the control trial; however, MPO was significantly reduced from SpI to SpII in the hot condition but not in the control condition (P < 0.025). Plasma ammonia was higher in the hot trial at 2 min post-SpI [169 (65) μmol l-1 hot vs 70 (26) μmol-1 control (P < 0.01)], immediately and at 2 min post-SpII [231 (76) μmol l-1 hot vs 147 (72) μmol l-1 control (P < 0.01)]. Blood lactate was higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial at 5 min post-SpII (P < 0.025). The results of this study suggest that an elevation in core body temperature by 1°C can improve performance during an initial bout of high-intensity cycle exercise but has no further beneficial effect on subsequent power production following a 4-min recovery period.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-166
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume93
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Fever
Temperature
Body Temperature
Baths
Ammonia
Foot
Lactic Acid
Neck
Water
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Blood lactate
  • Body temperature
  • Maximal exercise
  • Plasma ammonia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise. / Linnane, D. M.; Bracken, R. M.; Brooks, S.; Cox, V. M.; Ball, D.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 93, No. 1-2, 2004, p. 159-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Linnane, D. M. ; Bracken, R. M. ; Brooks, S. ; Cox, V. M. ; Ball, D. / Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004 ; Vol. 93, No. 1-2. pp. 159-166.
@article{da64471050fc455bad01559de9967880,
title = "Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise",
abstract = "In this study, we investigated the metabolic and performance responses to hyperthermia during high-intensity exercise. Seven males completed two 30-s cycle sprints (SpI and SpII) at an environmental temperature of 20.6 (0.3)°C [mean (SD)] with 4 min recovery between sprints. A hot or control treatment preceded the sprint exercise. For the hot trial, subjects were immersed up to the neck in hot water [43°C for 16.0 (3.2) min] prior to entering an environmental chamber [44.2 (0.8)°C for 30.7 (7.1) min]. For the control trial, subjects were seated in an empty bath (15 min) and thereafter in a normal environment [20.2 (0.6)°C for 29.0 (1.9) min]. Subjects' core temperature prior to exercise was 38.1 (0.3)°C in the hot trial and 37.1 (0.3)°C in the control trial. Mean power output (MPO) was significantly higher in the hot condition for SpI [683 (130) W hot vs 646 (119) W control (P < 0.025)]. Peak power output (PPO) tended to be higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial for SpI [1057 (260) W hot vs 990 (245) W control (P = 0.03, NS)]. These differences in power output were a consequence of a faster pedal cadence in the hot trial (P < 0.025). There were no differences in sprint performance in SpII in the hot trial compared to the control trial; however, MPO was significantly reduced from SpI to SpII in the hot condition but not in the control condition (P < 0.025). Plasma ammonia was higher in the hot trial at 2 min post-SpI [169 (65) μmol l-1 hot vs 70 (26) μmol-1 control (P < 0.01)], immediately and at 2 min post-SpII [231 (76) μmol l-1 hot vs 147 (72) μmol l-1 control (P < 0.01)]. Blood lactate was higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial at 5 min post-SpII (P < 0.025). The results of this study suggest that an elevation in core body temperature by 1°C can improve performance during an initial bout of high-intensity cycle exercise but has no further beneficial effect on subsequent power production following a 4-min recovery period.",
keywords = "Blood lactate, Body temperature, Maximal exercise, Plasma ammonia",
author = "Linnane, {D. M.} and Bracken, {R. M.} and S. Brooks and Cox, {V. M.} and D. Ball",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-004-1191-5",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "159--166",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise

AU - Linnane, D. M.

AU - Bracken, R. M.

AU - Brooks, S.

AU - Cox, V. M.

AU - Ball, D.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In this study, we investigated the metabolic and performance responses to hyperthermia during high-intensity exercise. Seven males completed two 30-s cycle sprints (SpI and SpII) at an environmental temperature of 20.6 (0.3)°C [mean (SD)] with 4 min recovery between sprints. A hot or control treatment preceded the sprint exercise. For the hot trial, subjects were immersed up to the neck in hot water [43°C for 16.0 (3.2) min] prior to entering an environmental chamber [44.2 (0.8)°C for 30.7 (7.1) min]. For the control trial, subjects were seated in an empty bath (15 min) and thereafter in a normal environment [20.2 (0.6)°C for 29.0 (1.9) min]. Subjects' core temperature prior to exercise was 38.1 (0.3)°C in the hot trial and 37.1 (0.3)°C in the control trial. Mean power output (MPO) was significantly higher in the hot condition for SpI [683 (130) W hot vs 646 (119) W control (P < 0.025)]. Peak power output (PPO) tended to be higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial for SpI [1057 (260) W hot vs 990 (245) W control (P = 0.03, NS)]. These differences in power output were a consequence of a faster pedal cadence in the hot trial (P < 0.025). There were no differences in sprint performance in SpII in the hot trial compared to the control trial; however, MPO was significantly reduced from SpI to SpII in the hot condition but not in the control condition (P < 0.025). Plasma ammonia was higher in the hot trial at 2 min post-SpI [169 (65) μmol l-1 hot vs 70 (26) μmol-1 control (P < 0.01)], immediately and at 2 min post-SpII [231 (76) μmol l-1 hot vs 147 (72) μmol l-1 control (P < 0.01)]. Blood lactate was higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial at 5 min post-SpII (P < 0.025). The results of this study suggest that an elevation in core body temperature by 1°C can improve performance during an initial bout of high-intensity cycle exercise but has no further beneficial effect on subsequent power production following a 4-min recovery period.

AB - In this study, we investigated the metabolic and performance responses to hyperthermia during high-intensity exercise. Seven males completed two 30-s cycle sprints (SpI and SpII) at an environmental temperature of 20.6 (0.3)°C [mean (SD)] with 4 min recovery between sprints. A hot or control treatment preceded the sprint exercise. For the hot trial, subjects were immersed up to the neck in hot water [43°C for 16.0 (3.2) min] prior to entering an environmental chamber [44.2 (0.8)°C for 30.7 (7.1) min]. For the control trial, subjects were seated in an empty bath (15 min) and thereafter in a normal environment [20.2 (0.6)°C for 29.0 (1.9) min]. Subjects' core temperature prior to exercise was 38.1 (0.3)°C in the hot trial and 37.1 (0.3)°C in the control trial. Mean power output (MPO) was significantly higher in the hot condition for SpI [683 (130) W hot vs 646 (119) W control (P < 0.025)]. Peak power output (PPO) tended to be higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial for SpI [1057 (260) W hot vs 990 (245) W control (P = 0.03, NS)]. These differences in power output were a consequence of a faster pedal cadence in the hot trial (P < 0.025). There were no differences in sprint performance in SpII in the hot trial compared to the control trial; however, MPO was significantly reduced from SpI to SpII in the hot condition but not in the control condition (P < 0.025). Plasma ammonia was higher in the hot trial at 2 min post-SpI [169 (65) μmol l-1 hot vs 70 (26) μmol-1 control (P < 0.01)], immediately and at 2 min post-SpII [231 (76) μmol l-1 hot vs 147 (72) μmol l-1 control (P < 0.01)]. Blood lactate was higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial at 5 min post-SpII (P < 0.025). The results of this study suggest that an elevation in core body temperature by 1°C can improve performance during an initial bout of high-intensity cycle exercise but has no further beneficial effect on subsequent power production following a 4-min recovery period.

KW - Blood lactate

KW - Body temperature

KW - Maximal exercise

KW - Plasma ammonia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8444226692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-004-1191-5

DO - 10.1007/s00421-004-1191-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 15549369

AN - SCOPUS:8444226692

VL - 93

SP - 159

EP - 166

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 1-2

ER -