Effects of input data aggregation on simulated crop yields in temperate and Mediterranean climates

Ganga Ram Maharjan*, Holger Hoffmann, Heidi Webber, Amit Kumar Srivastava, Lutz Weihermüller, Ana Villa, Elsa Coucheney, Elisabet Lewan, Giacomo Trombi, Marco Moriondo, Marco Bindi, Balazs Grosz, Rene Dechow, Mathias Kuhnert, Luca Doro, Kurt-Christian Kersebaum, Tommaso Stella, Xenia Specka, Claas Nendel, Julie ConstantinHélène Raynal, Frank Ewert, Thomas Gaiser

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)


Soil-crop models are used to simulate ecological processes from the field to the regional scale. Main inputs are soil and climate data in order to simulate model response variables such as crop yield. We investigate the effect of changing the resolution of input data on simulated crop yields at a regional scale using up to ten dynamic crop models. For these models we compared the effects of spatial input data aggregation for wheat and maize yield of two regions with contrasting climate conditions (1) Tuscany (Italy, Mediterranean climate) and (2) North Rhine Westphalia (NRW, Germany, temperate climate). Soil and climate data of 1 km resolution were aggregated to resolutions of 10, 25, 50, and 100 km by selecting the dominant soil class (and corresponding soil properties) and by arithmetic averaging, respectively. Differences in yield simulated at coarser resolutions from the yields simulated at 1 km resolution were calculated to quantify the effect of the aggregation of the input data (soil and climate data) on simulation results. The mean yield difference (bias) at the regional level was positive due to the upscaling of productive dominant soil(s) to coarser resolution. In both regions and for both crops, aggregation effects (i.e. errors in simulation of crop yields at coarser spatial resolution) due to the combined aggregation of soil and climate input data increased with decreasing resolution, whereby the aggregation error for Tuscany was larger than for North Rhine Westphalia (NRW). The average absolute percentage yield differences between grid cell yields at the coarsest resolution (100 km) compared to the finest resolution (1 km) were by about 20–30% for Tuscany and less than 15 and 20% for NRW for winter wheat and silage maize, respectively. In the Mediterranean area, the prediction errors of the simulated yields could reach up to 60% when looking at individual crop model simulations. Additionally, aggregating soil data caused larger aggregation errors in both regions than aggregating climate data. Those results suggest that a higher spatial resolution of climate and especially of soil input data are necessary in Mediterranean areas than in temperate humid regions of central Europe in order to predict reliable regional yield estimations with crop models. For generalization of these outcomes, further investigations in other sub-humid or semi-arid regions will be necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-46
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Journal of Agronomy
Early online date4 Dec 2018
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019


  • Data resolution
  • Scale
  • Modelling
  • Regional yield
  • Climate
  • Soil


Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of input data aggregation on simulated crop yields in temperate and Mediterranean climates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this