Effects of riparian buffer strips on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) within an agricultural landscape

Jenni Stockan, John Baird, Simon Langan, Mark R. Young, Glenn R. Iason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

1. Current restoration of stream and lotic freshwater systems to
‘good ecological status’ has focused on the creation of vegetated riparian buffer
strips. Yet, despite this constituting a major land-use change, surprisingly little
is known about the effects of these strips on riparian organisms. We investigated the effect that widespread adoption of buffer strips may have on activity
density, species diversity, and assemblage composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae).
2. Over 2 years, we sampled carabids from 41 riparian margins within two
river catchments in north-east Scotland. We compared three types of riparian
margin: unbuffered (i.e. ‘unimproved’), vegetated buffer strips, and wooded, the
latter acting as reference sites. A range of site parameters including characteristics of soil, water, and vegetation were recorded and the extent to which they
correlated with ground beetle assemblages was explored.
3. Catchment and treatment effects were detected on ground beetle activity
density and species diversity with unbuffered sites showing higher activity density and species richness. The assemblage structure differed according to catchment, treatment, and local characteristics. Multivariate analysis suggested that
soil and vegetation parameters and stream width, together with buffer strip age
and length were determinants of assemblage structure. Few riparian species
were found in large numbers.
4. This study shows that in intensively managed agricultural landscapes riparian buffer strips do not create the quality of habitat required by truly riparian
species. They do, however, provide habitat for woodland and stenotopic species
and with more careful planning could play a role in increasing habitat heterogeneity at a landscape scale.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-184
Number of pages14
JournalInsect Conservation and Diversity
Volume7
Issue number2
Early online date28 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

riparian buffers
buffer zone
Carabidae
conservation buffers
beetle
agricultural land
Coleoptera
catchment
species diversity
habitat
habitats
soil water characteristic
vegetation
multivariate analysis
land use change
Scotland
woodlands
woodland
planning
species richness

Keywords

  • agri-environment
  • buffer strips
  • catchment
  • diversity
  • fencing out
  • field margins
  • habitat improvement
  • restoration
  • riparian

Cite this

Effects of riparian buffer strips on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) within an agricultural landscape. / Stockan, Jenni; Baird, John; Langan, Simon; Young, Mark R.; Iason, Glenn R.

In: Insect Conservation and Diversity, Vol. 7, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 172-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stockan, Jenni ; Baird, John ; Langan, Simon ; Young, Mark R. ; Iason, Glenn R. / Effects of riparian buffer strips on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) within an agricultural landscape. In: Insect Conservation and Diversity. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 172-184.
@article{6bfb1cfd174b49d8af74b372a4497476,
title = "Effects of riparian buffer strips on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) within an agricultural landscape",
abstract = "1. Current restoration of stream and lotic freshwater systems to‘good ecological status’ has focused on the creation of vegetated riparian bufferstrips. Yet, despite this constituting a major land-use change, surprisingly littleis known about the effects of these strips on riparian organisms. We investigated the effect that widespread adoption of buffer strips may have on activitydensity, species diversity, and assemblage composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae).2. Over 2 years, we sampled carabids from 41 riparian margins within tworiver catchments in north-east Scotland. We compared three types of riparianmargin: unbuffered (i.e. ‘unimproved’), vegetated buffer strips, and wooded, thelatter acting as reference sites. A range of site parameters including characteristics of soil, water, and vegetation were recorded and the extent to which theycorrelated with ground beetle assemblages was explored.3. Catchment and treatment effects were detected on ground beetle activitydensity and species diversity with unbuffered sites showing higher activity density and species richness. The assemblage structure differed according to catchment, treatment, and local characteristics. Multivariate analysis suggested thatsoil and vegetation parameters and stream width, together with buffer strip ageand length were determinants of assemblage structure. Few riparian specieswere found in large numbers.4. This study shows that in intensively managed agricultural landscapes riparian buffer strips do not create the quality of habitat required by truly riparianspecies. They do, however, provide habitat for woodland and stenotopic speciesand with more careful planning could play a role in increasing habitat heterogeneity at a landscape scale.",
keywords = "agri-environment, buffer strips, catchment, diversity, fencing out , field margins, habitat improvement, restoration, riparian",
author = "Jenni Stockan and John Baird and Simon Langan and Young, {Mark R.} and Iason, {Glenn R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/icad.12043",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "172--184",
journal = "Insect Conservation and Diversity",
issn = "1752-458X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of riparian buffer strips on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) within an agricultural landscape

AU - Stockan, Jenni

AU - Baird, John

AU - Langan, Simon

AU - Young, Mark R.

AU - Iason, Glenn R.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - 1. Current restoration of stream and lotic freshwater systems to‘good ecological status’ has focused on the creation of vegetated riparian bufferstrips. Yet, despite this constituting a major land-use change, surprisingly littleis known about the effects of these strips on riparian organisms. We investigated the effect that widespread adoption of buffer strips may have on activitydensity, species diversity, and assemblage composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae).2. Over 2 years, we sampled carabids from 41 riparian margins within tworiver catchments in north-east Scotland. We compared three types of riparianmargin: unbuffered (i.e. ‘unimproved’), vegetated buffer strips, and wooded, thelatter acting as reference sites. A range of site parameters including characteristics of soil, water, and vegetation were recorded and the extent to which theycorrelated with ground beetle assemblages was explored.3. Catchment and treatment effects were detected on ground beetle activitydensity and species diversity with unbuffered sites showing higher activity density and species richness. The assemblage structure differed according to catchment, treatment, and local characteristics. Multivariate analysis suggested thatsoil and vegetation parameters and stream width, together with buffer strip ageand length were determinants of assemblage structure. Few riparian specieswere found in large numbers.4. This study shows that in intensively managed agricultural landscapes riparian buffer strips do not create the quality of habitat required by truly riparianspecies. They do, however, provide habitat for woodland and stenotopic speciesand with more careful planning could play a role in increasing habitat heterogeneity at a landscape scale.

AB - 1. Current restoration of stream and lotic freshwater systems to‘good ecological status’ has focused on the creation of vegetated riparian bufferstrips. Yet, despite this constituting a major land-use change, surprisingly littleis known about the effects of these strips on riparian organisms. We investigated the effect that widespread adoption of buffer strips may have on activitydensity, species diversity, and assemblage composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae).2. Over 2 years, we sampled carabids from 41 riparian margins within tworiver catchments in north-east Scotland. We compared three types of riparianmargin: unbuffered (i.e. ‘unimproved’), vegetated buffer strips, and wooded, thelatter acting as reference sites. A range of site parameters including characteristics of soil, water, and vegetation were recorded and the extent to which theycorrelated with ground beetle assemblages was explored.3. Catchment and treatment effects were detected on ground beetle activitydensity and species diversity with unbuffered sites showing higher activity density and species richness. The assemblage structure differed according to catchment, treatment, and local characteristics. Multivariate analysis suggested thatsoil and vegetation parameters and stream width, together with buffer strip ageand length were determinants of assemblage structure. Few riparian specieswere found in large numbers.4. This study shows that in intensively managed agricultural landscapes riparian buffer strips do not create the quality of habitat required by truly riparianspecies. They do, however, provide habitat for woodland and stenotopic speciesand with more careful planning could play a role in increasing habitat heterogeneity at a landscape scale.

KW - agri-environment

KW - buffer strips

KW - catchment

KW - diversity

KW - fencing out

KW - field margins

KW - habitat improvement

KW - restoration

KW - riparian

U2 - 10.1111/icad.12043

DO - 10.1111/icad.12043

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 172

EP - 184

JO - Insect Conservation and Diversity

JF - Insect Conservation and Diversity

SN - 1752-458X

IS - 2

ER -