Effects of secondary prevention clinics on health status in patients with coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised trial in primary care

Peter Murchie, Neil Crawford Campbell, Lewis Duthie Ritchie, H. G. Deans, J. Thain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The long-term effects of disease management programmes for coronary heart disease on health status are unknown. In a randomized trial of nurse-led secondary prevention clinics, we found significantly improved health status at 1 year. Participants were followed-up again at 4 years to determine if improvements had been sustained.

Objective. Our aim was to evaluate the effects on health of nurse-led clinics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care.

Methods. A total of 1343 patients with coronary heart disease were randomized to nurse-led secondary prevention clinics or usual care, with follow-up at 1 and 4 years by review of medical case notes and national data sets, and postal questionnaires. The study involved a stratified, random sample of 19 general practices in north-east Scotland. Health status was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, chest pain by the angina TyPE specification and anxiety and depression by the hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Results. At 1 year, there were significant improvements in five of eight SF-36 domains (all functioning scales, pain and general health) in patients randomized to clinics. Role limitations attributed to physical problems improved the most [adjusted difference 8.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16-12.9]. At 4 years, the intervention group scored higher than control in all domains, but differences were no longer significant. At 1 year, fewer patients in the intervention group reported worsening chest pain (odds ratio 0.59, 95% C1 0.37-0.94). At 4 years, there were no significant differences between the proportion of intervention or control group patients who reported chest pain in the last week or who reported worsening chest pain. No significant effects were observed on anxiety or depression at 1 or 4 years.

Conclusion. We have demonstrated previously a significantly greater survival in attendees at nurse-led secondary prevention clinics. Despite this, improvements in health status achieved in the first year of the study were reduced at 4 years. The case for nurse-led clinics remains strong, but further research is required on ways to optimize current health status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-74
Number of pages8
JournalFamily Practice
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • coronary heart disease
  • primary care
  • secondary prevention
  • HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK
  • MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
  • GENERAL-PRACTICE
  • PROMOTION

Cite this

Effects of secondary prevention clinics on health status in patients with coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised trial in primary care. / Murchie, Peter; Campbell, Neil Crawford; Ritchie, Lewis Duthie; Deans, H. G.; Thain, J.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2004, p. 567-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b76fea8959ce43b59b11cb4391e0ddab,
title = "Effects of secondary prevention clinics on health status in patients with coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised trial in primary care",
abstract = "Background. The long-term effects of disease management programmes for coronary heart disease on health status are unknown. In a randomized trial of nurse-led secondary prevention clinics, we found significantly improved health status at 1 year. Participants were followed-up again at 4 years to determine if improvements had been sustained.Objective. Our aim was to evaluate the effects on health of nurse-led clinics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care.Methods. A total of 1343 patients with coronary heart disease were randomized to nurse-led secondary prevention clinics or usual care, with follow-up at 1 and 4 years by review of medical case notes and national data sets, and postal questionnaires. The study involved a stratified, random sample of 19 general practices in north-east Scotland. Health status was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, chest pain by the angina TyPE specification and anxiety and depression by the hospital anxiety and depression scale.Results. At 1 year, there were significant improvements in five of eight SF-36 domains (all functioning scales, pain and general health) in patients randomized to clinics. Role limitations attributed to physical problems improved the most [adjusted difference 8.52, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 4.16-12.9]. At 4 years, the intervention group scored higher than control in all domains, but differences were no longer significant. At 1 year, fewer patients in the intervention group reported worsening chest pain (odds ratio 0.59, 95{\%} C1 0.37-0.94). At 4 years, there were no significant differences between the proportion of intervention or control group patients who reported chest pain in the last week or who reported worsening chest pain. No significant effects were observed on anxiety or depression at 1 or 4 years.Conclusion. We have demonstrated previously a significantly greater survival in attendees at nurse-led secondary prevention clinics. Despite this, improvements in health status achieved in the first year of the study were reduced at 4 years. The case for nurse-led clinics remains strong, but further research is required on ways to optimize current health status.",
keywords = "coronary heart disease, primary care, secondary prevention, HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK, MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, GENERAL-PRACTICE, PROMOTION",
author = "Peter Murchie and Campbell, {Neil Crawford} and Ritchie, {Lewis Duthie} and Deans, {H. G.} and J. Thain",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmh514",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "567--74",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of secondary prevention clinics on health status in patients with coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised trial in primary care

AU - Murchie, Peter

AU - Campbell, Neil Crawford

AU - Ritchie, Lewis Duthie

AU - Deans, H. G.

AU - Thain, J.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Background. The long-term effects of disease management programmes for coronary heart disease on health status are unknown. In a randomized trial of nurse-led secondary prevention clinics, we found significantly improved health status at 1 year. Participants were followed-up again at 4 years to determine if improvements had been sustained.Objective. Our aim was to evaluate the effects on health of nurse-led clinics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care.Methods. A total of 1343 patients with coronary heart disease were randomized to nurse-led secondary prevention clinics or usual care, with follow-up at 1 and 4 years by review of medical case notes and national data sets, and postal questionnaires. The study involved a stratified, random sample of 19 general practices in north-east Scotland. Health status was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, chest pain by the angina TyPE specification and anxiety and depression by the hospital anxiety and depression scale.Results. At 1 year, there were significant improvements in five of eight SF-36 domains (all functioning scales, pain and general health) in patients randomized to clinics. Role limitations attributed to physical problems improved the most [adjusted difference 8.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16-12.9]. At 4 years, the intervention group scored higher than control in all domains, but differences were no longer significant. At 1 year, fewer patients in the intervention group reported worsening chest pain (odds ratio 0.59, 95% C1 0.37-0.94). At 4 years, there were no significant differences between the proportion of intervention or control group patients who reported chest pain in the last week or who reported worsening chest pain. No significant effects were observed on anxiety or depression at 1 or 4 years.Conclusion. We have demonstrated previously a significantly greater survival in attendees at nurse-led secondary prevention clinics. Despite this, improvements in health status achieved in the first year of the study were reduced at 4 years. The case for nurse-led clinics remains strong, but further research is required on ways to optimize current health status.

AB - Background. The long-term effects of disease management programmes for coronary heart disease on health status are unknown. In a randomized trial of nurse-led secondary prevention clinics, we found significantly improved health status at 1 year. Participants were followed-up again at 4 years to determine if improvements had been sustained.Objective. Our aim was to evaluate the effects on health of nurse-led clinics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care.Methods. A total of 1343 patients with coronary heart disease were randomized to nurse-led secondary prevention clinics or usual care, with follow-up at 1 and 4 years by review of medical case notes and national data sets, and postal questionnaires. The study involved a stratified, random sample of 19 general practices in north-east Scotland. Health status was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, chest pain by the angina TyPE specification and anxiety and depression by the hospital anxiety and depression scale.Results. At 1 year, there were significant improvements in five of eight SF-36 domains (all functioning scales, pain and general health) in patients randomized to clinics. Role limitations attributed to physical problems improved the most [adjusted difference 8.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16-12.9]. At 4 years, the intervention group scored higher than control in all domains, but differences were no longer significant. At 1 year, fewer patients in the intervention group reported worsening chest pain (odds ratio 0.59, 95% C1 0.37-0.94). At 4 years, there were no significant differences between the proportion of intervention or control group patients who reported chest pain in the last week or who reported worsening chest pain. No significant effects were observed on anxiety or depression at 1 or 4 years.Conclusion. We have demonstrated previously a significantly greater survival in attendees at nurse-led secondary prevention clinics. Despite this, improvements in health status achieved in the first year of the study were reduced at 4 years. The case for nurse-led clinics remains strong, but further research is required on ways to optimize current health status.

KW - coronary heart disease

KW - primary care

KW - secondary prevention

KW - HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK

KW - MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION

KW - GENERAL-PRACTICE

KW - PROMOTION

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmh514

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmh514

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 567

EP - 574

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 5

ER -