Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lacunar stroke accounts for ≈25% of ischemic stroke, but optimal antiplatelet regimen to prevent stroke recurrence remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in secondary stroke prevention after a lacunar stroke.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials that reported risk of recurrent stroke or death with antiplatelet therapy in patients with lacunar stroke. We used random effects meta-analysis and evaluated heterogeneity with I(2).
RESULTS: We included 17 trials with 42 234 participants (mean age 64.4 years, 65% male) and follow up ranging from 4 weeks to 3.5 years. Compared with placebo, any single antiplatelet agent was associated with a significant reduction in recurrence of any stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 0.62-0.97, 2 studies) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.48, 0.30-0.78, 2 studies), but not for the composite outcome of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (RR 0.89, 0.75-1.05, 2 studies). When other antiplatelet agents (ticlodipine, cilostazol, and dipyridamole) were compared with aspirin, there was no consistent reduction in stroke recurrence (RR 0.91, 0.75-1.10, 3 studies). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not confer clear benefit over monotherapy (any stroke RR 0.83, 0.68-1.00, 3 studies; ischemic stroke RR 0.80, 0.62-1.02, 3 studies; composite outcome RR 0.90, 0.80-1.02, 3 studies).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that any of the single antiplatelet agents compared with placebo in the included trials is adequate for secondary stroke prevention after lacunar stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy should not be used for long-term stroke prevention in this stroke subtype.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1014-1023 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Stroke |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 26 Feb 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- antiplatelet agent
- aspirin
- lacunar stroke
- mortality
- stroke
Cite this
Efficacy of Antiplatelet Therapy in Secondary Prevention Following Lacunar Stroke : Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. / Kwok, Chun Shing; Shoamanesh, Ashkan; Copley, Hannah Charlotte; Myint, Phyo Kyaw; Loke, Yoon K; Benavente, Oscar R.
In: Stroke, Vol. 46, No. 4, 04.2015, p. 1014-1023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of Antiplatelet Therapy in Secondary Prevention Following Lacunar Stroke
T2 - Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
AU - Kwok, Chun Shing
AU - Shoamanesh, Ashkan
AU - Copley, Hannah Charlotte
AU - Myint, Phyo Kyaw
AU - Loke, Yoon K
AU - Benavente, Oscar R
N1 - © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc. Acknowledgements C.S. Kwok and A. Shoamanesh was involved in design, screening, study selection, data extraction, data analysis, and preparation of article. H.C. Copley was involved in screening and data extraction. P.K. Myint was involved in the design, screening, and preparation of the article. Y.K. Loke was involved in the design, study selection, data extractions, data analysis, and preparation of the article. O.R. Benavente was involved in design and preparation of the article.
PY - 2015/4
Y1 - 2015/4
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lacunar stroke accounts for ≈25% of ischemic stroke, but optimal antiplatelet regimen to prevent stroke recurrence remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in secondary stroke prevention after a lacunar stroke.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials that reported risk of recurrent stroke or death with antiplatelet therapy in patients with lacunar stroke. We used random effects meta-analysis and evaluated heterogeneity with I(2).RESULTS: We included 17 trials with 42 234 participants (mean age 64.4 years, 65% male) and follow up ranging from 4 weeks to 3.5 years. Compared with placebo, any single antiplatelet agent was associated with a significant reduction in recurrence of any stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 0.62-0.97, 2 studies) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.48, 0.30-0.78, 2 studies), but not for the composite outcome of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (RR 0.89, 0.75-1.05, 2 studies). When other antiplatelet agents (ticlodipine, cilostazol, and dipyridamole) were compared with aspirin, there was no consistent reduction in stroke recurrence (RR 0.91, 0.75-1.10, 3 studies). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not confer clear benefit over monotherapy (any stroke RR 0.83, 0.68-1.00, 3 studies; ischemic stroke RR 0.80, 0.62-1.02, 3 studies; composite outcome RR 0.90, 0.80-1.02, 3 studies).CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that any of the single antiplatelet agents compared with placebo in the included trials is adequate for secondary stroke prevention after lacunar stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy should not be used for long-term stroke prevention in this stroke subtype.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lacunar stroke accounts for ≈25% of ischemic stroke, but optimal antiplatelet regimen to prevent stroke recurrence remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in secondary stroke prevention after a lacunar stroke.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials that reported risk of recurrent stroke or death with antiplatelet therapy in patients with lacunar stroke. We used random effects meta-analysis and evaluated heterogeneity with I(2).RESULTS: We included 17 trials with 42 234 participants (mean age 64.4 years, 65% male) and follow up ranging from 4 weeks to 3.5 years. Compared with placebo, any single antiplatelet agent was associated with a significant reduction in recurrence of any stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 0.62-0.97, 2 studies) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.48, 0.30-0.78, 2 studies), but not for the composite outcome of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (RR 0.89, 0.75-1.05, 2 studies). When other antiplatelet agents (ticlodipine, cilostazol, and dipyridamole) were compared with aspirin, there was no consistent reduction in stroke recurrence (RR 0.91, 0.75-1.10, 3 studies). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not confer clear benefit over monotherapy (any stroke RR 0.83, 0.68-1.00, 3 studies; ischemic stroke RR 0.80, 0.62-1.02, 3 studies; composite outcome RR 0.90, 0.80-1.02, 3 studies).CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that any of the single antiplatelet agents compared with placebo in the included trials is adequate for secondary stroke prevention after lacunar stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy should not be used for long-term stroke prevention in this stroke subtype.
KW - antiplatelet agent
KW - aspirin
KW - lacunar stroke
KW - mortality
KW - stroke
U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008422
DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008422
M3 - Article
C2 - 25721018
VL - 46
SP - 1014
EP - 1023
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
SN - 0039-2499
IS - 4
ER -