Efficiency in the trust game: an experimental study of precommitment

Juergen Bracht, Nick Feltovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We experimentally test a precommitment mechanism for the trust game. Before the investor's decision, the allocator places an amount into escrow, to be forfeited if he keeps the proceeds of investment for himself. We vary the available escrow amounts-in particular, whether there is a high amount that gives rise to an efficient equilibrium-and whether escrow is voluntary or imposed. We find that when chosen, the high escrow amount does lead to efficient outcomes. We also find substantial investment when the high amount is unavailable or not chosen, though well below that when it is chosen, and declining over time. We find only weak evidence for behavioral theories, such as crowding out and signaling. These results are seen when escrow choices are imposed as well as when they are voluntary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-72
Number of pages33
JournalInternational Journal of Game Theory
Volume37
Issue number1
Early online date28 Apr 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Keywords

  • mechanism
  • trust game
  • incentives
  • signal
  • crowding out
  • public-goods
  • market
  • reciprocity
  • strategies
  • provision
  • evolution
  • models

Cite this

Efficiency in the trust game : an experimental study of precommitment. / Bracht, Juergen; Feltovich, Nick.

In: International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 37, No. 1, 04.2008, p. 39-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{711035ccf2e7472495ba83404403b158,
title = "Efficiency in the trust game: an experimental study of precommitment",
abstract = "We experimentally test a precommitment mechanism for the trust game. Before the investor's decision, the allocator places an amount into escrow, to be forfeited if he keeps the proceeds of investment for himself. We vary the available escrow amounts-in particular, whether there is a high amount that gives rise to an efficient equilibrium-and whether escrow is voluntary or imposed. We find that when chosen, the high escrow amount does lead to efficient outcomes. We also find substantial investment when the high amount is unavailable or not chosen, though well below that when it is chosen, and declining over time. We find only weak evidence for behavioral theories, such as crowding out and signaling. These results are seen when escrow choices are imposed as well as when they are voluntary.",
keywords = "mechanism, trust game, incentives, signal, crowding out, public-goods, market, reciprocity, strategies, provision, evolution, models",
author = "Juergen Bracht and Nick Feltovich",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/S00182-007-0092-3",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "39--72",
journal = "International Journal of Game Theory",
issn = "0020-7276",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency in the trust game

T2 - an experimental study of precommitment

AU - Bracht, Juergen

AU - Feltovich, Nick

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - We experimentally test a precommitment mechanism for the trust game. Before the investor's decision, the allocator places an amount into escrow, to be forfeited if he keeps the proceeds of investment for himself. We vary the available escrow amounts-in particular, whether there is a high amount that gives rise to an efficient equilibrium-and whether escrow is voluntary or imposed. We find that when chosen, the high escrow amount does lead to efficient outcomes. We also find substantial investment when the high amount is unavailable or not chosen, though well below that when it is chosen, and declining over time. We find only weak evidence for behavioral theories, such as crowding out and signaling. These results are seen when escrow choices are imposed as well as when they are voluntary.

AB - We experimentally test a precommitment mechanism for the trust game. Before the investor's decision, the allocator places an amount into escrow, to be forfeited if he keeps the proceeds of investment for himself. We vary the available escrow amounts-in particular, whether there is a high amount that gives rise to an efficient equilibrium-and whether escrow is voluntary or imposed. We find that when chosen, the high escrow amount does lead to efficient outcomes. We also find substantial investment when the high amount is unavailable or not chosen, though well below that when it is chosen, and declining over time. We find only weak evidence for behavioral theories, such as crowding out and signaling. These results are seen when escrow choices are imposed as well as when they are voluntary.

KW - mechanism

KW - trust game

KW - incentives

KW - signal

KW - crowding out

KW - public-goods

KW - market

KW - reciprocity

KW - strategies

KW - provision

KW - evolution

KW - models

U2 - 10.1007/S00182-007-0092-3

DO - 10.1007/S00182-007-0092-3

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 39

EP - 72

JO - International Journal of Game Theory

JF - International Journal of Game Theory

SN - 0020-7276

IS - 1

ER -