Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventionally, most in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos are transferred in fresh treatment cycles with freezing reserved for spare ones. Improvement in cryopreservation facilities over time has encouraged the greater use of this technology with the success rate of frozen replacement cycles approaching that associated with fresh embryo transfer. Data from observational studies suggest that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are better in pregnancies resulting from frozen replacement cycles. In the interests of promoting feto-maternal safety is it therefore time to avoid fresh embryo transfers in IVF, freeze all available embryos and replace them in subsequent cycles? In this article we explore the biological plausibility of this concept, appraise the evidence underpinning it and consider the implications of adopting such a strategy in routine clinical practice. The outcomes of existing randomized trials appear to favour a strategy of frozen embryo transfer, but larger trials are needed before a major change in clinical practice can be considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-9
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date11 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Embryo Transfer
Fertilization in Vitro
Embryonic Structures
Cryopreservation
Freezing
Obstetrics
Observational Studies
Mothers
Technology
Safety
Pregnancy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • IVF
  • ISCI
  • perinatal outcomes
  • obstetric outcomes
  • frozen embryo transfer

Cite this

Elective frozen replacement cycles for all : ready for prime time? / Maheshwari, Abha; Bhattacharya, Siladitya.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 6-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f52e981c05b46868fc5e52bc773b302,
title = "Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?",
abstract = "Conventionally, most in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos are transferred in fresh treatment cycles with freezing reserved for spare ones. Improvement in cryopreservation facilities over time has encouraged the greater use of this technology with the success rate of frozen replacement cycles approaching that associated with fresh embryo transfer. Data from observational studies suggest that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are better in pregnancies resulting from frozen replacement cycles. In the interests of promoting feto-maternal safety is it therefore time to avoid fresh embryo transfers in IVF, freeze all available embryos and replace them in subsequent cycles? In this article we explore the biological plausibility of this concept, appraise the evidence underpinning it and consider the implications of adopting such a strategy in routine clinical practice. The outcomes of existing randomized trials appear to favour a strategy of frozen embryo transfer, but larger trials are needed before a major change in clinical practice can be considered.",
keywords = "IVF, ISCI, perinatal outcomes, obstetric outcomes, frozen embryo transfer",
author = "Abha Maheshwari and Siladitya Bhattacharya",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/des386",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "6--9",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elective frozen replacement cycles for all

T2 - ready for prime time?

AU - Maheshwari, Abha

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Conventionally, most in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos are transferred in fresh treatment cycles with freezing reserved for spare ones. Improvement in cryopreservation facilities over time has encouraged the greater use of this technology with the success rate of frozen replacement cycles approaching that associated with fresh embryo transfer. Data from observational studies suggest that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are better in pregnancies resulting from frozen replacement cycles. In the interests of promoting feto-maternal safety is it therefore time to avoid fresh embryo transfers in IVF, freeze all available embryos and replace them in subsequent cycles? In this article we explore the biological plausibility of this concept, appraise the evidence underpinning it and consider the implications of adopting such a strategy in routine clinical practice. The outcomes of existing randomized trials appear to favour a strategy of frozen embryo transfer, but larger trials are needed before a major change in clinical practice can be considered.

AB - Conventionally, most in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos are transferred in fresh treatment cycles with freezing reserved for spare ones. Improvement in cryopreservation facilities over time has encouraged the greater use of this technology with the success rate of frozen replacement cycles approaching that associated with fresh embryo transfer. Data from observational studies suggest that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are better in pregnancies resulting from frozen replacement cycles. In the interests of promoting feto-maternal safety is it therefore time to avoid fresh embryo transfers in IVF, freeze all available embryos and replace them in subsequent cycles? In this article we explore the biological plausibility of this concept, appraise the evidence underpinning it and consider the implications of adopting such a strategy in routine clinical practice. The outcomes of existing randomized trials appear to favour a strategy of frozen embryo transfer, but larger trials are needed before a major change in clinical practice can be considered.

KW - IVF

KW - ISCI

KW - perinatal outcomes

KW - obstetric outcomes

KW - frozen embryo transfer

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/des386

DO - 10.1093/humrep/des386

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 6

EP - 9

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 1

ER -