Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The National Health Service (NHS) intends to introduce a system of electronic tranfer of prescription-related information between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacies. The NHS Plan describes how this will he achieved. Aim. To gather opinions of patients, GPs, and community pharmacists on the development of a stem of electronic transfer of system of electronic transfer of prescription-related information between GPs and community pharmacies.

Design of study Survey combining interviews focus groups, and postal questionnaires.

Setting. General practitioners, opinion leaders, computing experts, pharmacists, and patients Eight hundred members of the public, 200 GTs. and 200 community pharmacists, all living in Scotland.

Method content-setting interviews and focus groups were conducted with purposive samples of relevant groups. Postal questionnaires were developed and sent to random samples of members of the public selected from the electoral roll, GPs, and community pharmacists

Results. The corrected postal response rates were: 69% (patients); 74% (GPs); and 7496 (community pharmacists). All three groups were generally supportive of electronic transfer of prescription-related information. Different aspects appealed to each group: patients anticipated improved convenience, GPs, better repeat prescribing; and pharmacists, an enhanced professional role. Security of patient-identifiable information was the main concern. All groups acknowledged potential benefits of a full primary care information system, but GPs and patients had reservations about allowing community pharmacists to access parts of the medical record that did not concern medication.

conclusion: Electronic transfer of prescription-related information is likely to he acceptable to all users, but concerns about patient confidentiality and an extended role for pharmacists in prescription management need to he addressed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-209
Number of pages5
JournalThe British Journal of General Practice
Volume53
Issue number488
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • electronic patient records
  • confidentiality
  • prescriptions
  • community pharmacies
  • REPEAT

Cite this

@article{49c90593406049f6bd91aec2da2f896e,
title = "Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists",
abstract = "Background: The National Health Service (NHS) intends to introduce a system of electronic tranfer of prescription-related information between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacies. The NHS Plan describes how this will he achieved. Aim. To gather opinions of patients, GPs, and community pharmacists on the development of a stem of electronic transfer of system of electronic transfer of prescription-related information between GPs and community pharmacies.Design of study Survey combining interviews focus groups, and postal questionnaires.Setting. General practitioners, opinion leaders, computing experts, pharmacists, and patients Eight hundred members of the public, 200 GTs. and 200 community pharmacists, all living in Scotland.Method content-setting interviews and focus groups were conducted with purposive samples of relevant groups. Postal questionnaires were developed and sent to random samples of members of the public selected from the electoral roll, GPs, and community pharmacistsResults. The corrected postal response rates were: 69{\%} (patients); 74{\%} (GPs); and 7496 (community pharmacists). All three groups were generally supportive of electronic transfer of prescription-related information. Different aspects appealed to each group: patients anticipated improved convenience, GPs, better repeat prescribing; and pharmacists, an enhanced professional role. Security of patient-identifiable information was the main concern. All groups acknowledged potential benefits of a full primary care information system, but GPs and patients had reservations about allowing community pharmacists to access parts of the medical record that did not concern medication.conclusion: Electronic transfer of prescription-related information is likely to he acceptable to all users, but concerns about patient confidentiality and an extended role for pharmacists in prescription management need to he addressed.",
keywords = "electronic patient records, confidentiality, prescriptions, community pharmacies, REPEAT",
author = "Porteous, {Terry Hall} and Bond, {Christine Margaret} and Roma Robertson and Hannaford, {Philip Christopher} and Reiter, {Ehud Baruch}",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "204--209",
journal = "The British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "488",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists

AU - Porteous, Terry Hall

AU - Bond, Christine Margaret

AU - Robertson, Roma

AU - Hannaford, Philip Christopher

AU - Reiter, Ehud Baruch

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Background: The National Health Service (NHS) intends to introduce a system of electronic tranfer of prescription-related information between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacies. The NHS Plan describes how this will he achieved. Aim. To gather opinions of patients, GPs, and community pharmacists on the development of a stem of electronic transfer of system of electronic transfer of prescription-related information between GPs and community pharmacies.Design of study Survey combining interviews focus groups, and postal questionnaires.Setting. General practitioners, opinion leaders, computing experts, pharmacists, and patients Eight hundred members of the public, 200 GTs. and 200 community pharmacists, all living in Scotland.Method content-setting interviews and focus groups were conducted with purposive samples of relevant groups. Postal questionnaires were developed and sent to random samples of members of the public selected from the electoral roll, GPs, and community pharmacistsResults. The corrected postal response rates were: 69% (patients); 74% (GPs); and 7496 (community pharmacists). All three groups were generally supportive of electronic transfer of prescription-related information. Different aspects appealed to each group: patients anticipated improved convenience, GPs, better repeat prescribing; and pharmacists, an enhanced professional role. Security of patient-identifiable information was the main concern. All groups acknowledged potential benefits of a full primary care information system, but GPs and patients had reservations about allowing community pharmacists to access parts of the medical record that did not concern medication.conclusion: Electronic transfer of prescription-related information is likely to he acceptable to all users, but concerns about patient confidentiality and an extended role for pharmacists in prescription management need to he addressed.

AB - Background: The National Health Service (NHS) intends to introduce a system of electronic tranfer of prescription-related information between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacies. The NHS Plan describes how this will he achieved. Aim. To gather opinions of patients, GPs, and community pharmacists on the development of a stem of electronic transfer of system of electronic transfer of prescription-related information between GPs and community pharmacies.Design of study Survey combining interviews focus groups, and postal questionnaires.Setting. General practitioners, opinion leaders, computing experts, pharmacists, and patients Eight hundred members of the public, 200 GTs. and 200 community pharmacists, all living in Scotland.Method content-setting interviews and focus groups were conducted with purposive samples of relevant groups. Postal questionnaires were developed and sent to random samples of members of the public selected from the electoral roll, GPs, and community pharmacistsResults. The corrected postal response rates were: 69% (patients); 74% (GPs); and 7496 (community pharmacists). All three groups were generally supportive of electronic transfer of prescription-related information. Different aspects appealed to each group: patients anticipated improved convenience, GPs, better repeat prescribing; and pharmacists, an enhanced professional role. Security of patient-identifiable information was the main concern. All groups acknowledged potential benefits of a full primary care information system, but GPs and patients had reservations about allowing community pharmacists to access parts of the medical record that did not concern medication.conclusion: Electronic transfer of prescription-related information is likely to he acceptable to all users, but concerns about patient confidentiality and an extended role for pharmacists in prescription management need to he addressed.

KW - electronic patient records

KW - confidentiality

KW - prescriptions

KW - community pharmacies

KW - REPEAT

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 204

EP - 209

JO - The British Journal of General Practice

JF - The British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 488

ER -