Elementary Forms of the Metaphorical Life: Tropes at Work in Durkheim’s Theory of the Religious

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scholars have not infrequently called attention to the master metaphors in Durkheim’s writing, those figures, typically drawn from biology, physics and chemistry, which structure his sociological thought. Less attention has been given to the work that metaphors do in Durkheim’s texts, or to Durkheim’s fundamental ambivalence about metaphor. This paper argues that Durkheim depends on metaphor to construct the building blocks, and not just the overall architecture of his argument in The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). His conception of the ‘gods’ of totemism makes the theory relevant to modern European religion, and in his construction of the concept of the sacred depends on electrical and epidemiological metaphors. I argue that Durkheim’s theory of social representation (the central argument of the book) is a theory of metaphorical relations between social organisation and the organisation of the cosmos.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-221
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Classical Sociology
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date18 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

metaphor
ambivalence
Social Relations
god
physics
biology
chemistry
Religion

Keywords

  • Durkheim
  • metaphor
  • religion
  • social representation
  • totemism

Cite this

@article{edaee777b121490284f64811fc06af5e,
title = "Elementary Forms of the Metaphorical Life: Tropes at Work in Durkheim’s Theory of the Religious",
abstract = "Scholars have not infrequently called attention to the master metaphors in Durkheim’s writing, those figures, typically drawn from biology, physics and chemistry, which structure his sociological thought. Less attention has been given to the work that metaphors do in Durkheim’s texts, or to Durkheim’s fundamental ambivalence about metaphor. This paper argues that Durkheim depends on metaphor to construct the building blocks, and not just the overall architecture of his argument in The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). His conception of the ‘gods’ of totemism makes the theory relevant to modern European religion, and in his construction of the concept of the sacred depends on electrical and epidemiological metaphors. I argue that Durkheim’s theory of social representation (the central argument of the book) is a theory of metaphorical relations between social organisation and the organisation of the cosmos.",
keywords = "Durkheim, metaphor, religion, social representation, totemism",
author = "Andrew McKinnon",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1468795X13494130",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "203--221",
journal = "Journal of Classical Sociology",
issn = "1468-795X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elementary Forms of the Metaphorical Life

T2 - Tropes at Work in Durkheim’s Theory of the Religious

AU - McKinnon, Andrew

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Scholars have not infrequently called attention to the master metaphors in Durkheim’s writing, those figures, typically drawn from biology, physics and chemistry, which structure his sociological thought. Less attention has been given to the work that metaphors do in Durkheim’s texts, or to Durkheim’s fundamental ambivalence about metaphor. This paper argues that Durkheim depends on metaphor to construct the building blocks, and not just the overall architecture of his argument in The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). His conception of the ‘gods’ of totemism makes the theory relevant to modern European religion, and in his construction of the concept of the sacred depends on electrical and epidemiological metaphors. I argue that Durkheim’s theory of social representation (the central argument of the book) is a theory of metaphorical relations between social organisation and the organisation of the cosmos.

AB - Scholars have not infrequently called attention to the master metaphors in Durkheim’s writing, those figures, typically drawn from biology, physics and chemistry, which structure his sociological thought. Less attention has been given to the work that metaphors do in Durkheim’s texts, or to Durkheim’s fundamental ambivalence about metaphor. This paper argues that Durkheim depends on metaphor to construct the building blocks, and not just the overall architecture of his argument in The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). His conception of the ‘gods’ of totemism makes the theory relevant to modern European religion, and in his construction of the concept of the sacred depends on electrical and epidemiological metaphors. I argue that Durkheim’s theory of social representation (the central argument of the book) is a theory of metaphorical relations between social organisation and the organisation of the cosmos.

KW - Durkheim

KW - metaphor

KW - religion

KW - social representation

KW - totemism

U2 - 10.1177/1468795X13494130

DO - 10.1177/1468795X13494130

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 203

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Classical Sociology

JF - Journal of Classical Sociology

SN - 1468-795X

IS - 2

ER -