Eliade on Myth and Science

Robert A. Segal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In contrast to nineteenth-century theorists, who set myth against science, Mircea Eliade, like other twentieth-century theorists, sought to reconcile myth with science. For both Bronislaw Malinowski and Eliade myth is, to be sure, an explanation in part, but the explanation is only a means to a nonscientific end rather than the end itself. By contrast to Malinowski, Eliade, like Edward B. Tylor and James George Frazer, assumes that primitive peoples have just myth and not also science, so that the issue of the compatibility of myth with primitive science does not arise. Eliade ventures far beyond Malinowski, not to say Tylor and Frazer, in making myth universal and, as presumably is the case for Malinowski, not merely primitive. Neither Malinowski nor Eliade challenges Frazer’s and especially Tylor’s literal reading of myth. By contrast, Malinowski and Eliade reconcile myth with science by recharacterizing the function of myth.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMircea Eliade
Subtitle of host publicationMyth, Religion, and History
EditorsNicolae Babuts
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherTaylor and Francis AS
Chapter4
Pages65-76
Number of pages12
EditioneBook edition
ISBN (Electronic)9781351505185
ISBN (Print)9781412852999
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Mircea Eliade
Theorists
Bronislaw Malinowski
Primitive Peoples
Compatibility
Sir Edward Burnett Tylor
Myth-making
Sir James George Frazer

Keywords

  • Mircea Eliade
  • sacred reality
  • myths

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Segal, R. A. (2017). Eliade on Myth and Science. In N. Babuts (Ed.), Mircea Eliade: Myth, Religion, and History (eBook edition ed., pp. 65-76). New York: Taylor and Francis AS. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315124575

Eliade on Myth and Science. / Segal, Robert A.

Mircea Eliade: Myth, Religion, and History. ed. / Nicolae Babuts. eBook edition. ed. New York : Taylor and Francis AS, 2017. p. 65-76.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Segal, RA 2017, Eliade on Myth and Science. in N Babuts (ed.), Mircea Eliade: Myth, Religion, and History. eBook edition edn, Taylor and Francis AS, New York, pp. 65-76. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315124575
Segal RA. Eliade on Myth and Science. In Babuts N, editor, Mircea Eliade: Myth, Religion, and History. eBook edition ed. New York: Taylor and Francis AS. 2017. p. 65-76 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315124575
Segal, Robert A. / Eliade on Myth and Science. Mircea Eliade: Myth, Religion, and History. editor / Nicolae Babuts. eBook edition. ed. New York : Taylor and Francis AS, 2017. pp. 65-76
@inbook{1cd71bb85f34431e80b2cfd885b67385,
title = "Eliade on Myth and Science",
abstract = "In contrast to nineteenth-century theorists, who set myth against science, Mircea Eliade, like other twentieth-century theorists, sought to reconcile myth with science. For both Bronislaw Malinowski and Eliade myth is, to be sure, an explanation in part, but the explanation is only a means to a nonscientific end rather than the end itself. By contrast to Malinowski, Eliade, like Edward B. Tylor and James George Frazer, assumes that primitive peoples have just myth and not also science, so that the issue of the compatibility of myth with primitive science does not arise. Eliade ventures far beyond Malinowski, not to say Tylor and Frazer, in making myth universal and, as presumably is the case for Malinowski, not merely primitive. Neither Malinowski nor Eliade challenges Frazer’s and especially Tylor’s literal reading of myth. By contrast, Malinowski and Eliade reconcile myth with science by recharacterizing the function of myth.",
keywords = "Mircea Eliade, sacred reality, myths",
author = "Segal, {Robert A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315124575",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781412852999",
pages = "65--76",
editor = "Babuts, {Nicolae }",
booktitle = "Mircea Eliade",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis AS",
address = "Sweden",
edition = "eBook edition",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Eliade on Myth and Science

AU - Segal, Robert A.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In contrast to nineteenth-century theorists, who set myth against science, Mircea Eliade, like other twentieth-century theorists, sought to reconcile myth with science. For both Bronislaw Malinowski and Eliade myth is, to be sure, an explanation in part, but the explanation is only a means to a nonscientific end rather than the end itself. By contrast to Malinowski, Eliade, like Edward B. Tylor and James George Frazer, assumes that primitive peoples have just myth and not also science, so that the issue of the compatibility of myth with primitive science does not arise. Eliade ventures far beyond Malinowski, not to say Tylor and Frazer, in making myth universal and, as presumably is the case for Malinowski, not merely primitive. Neither Malinowski nor Eliade challenges Frazer’s and especially Tylor’s literal reading of myth. By contrast, Malinowski and Eliade reconcile myth with science by recharacterizing the function of myth.

AB - In contrast to nineteenth-century theorists, who set myth against science, Mircea Eliade, like other twentieth-century theorists, sought to reconcile myth with science. For both Bronislaw Malinowski and Eliade myth is, to be sure, an explanation in part, but the explanation is only a means to a nonscientific end rather than the end itself. By contrast to Malinowski, Eliade, like Edward B. Tylor and James George Frazer, assumes that primitive peoples have just myth and not also science, so that the issue of the compatibility of myth with primitive science does not arise. Eliade ventures far beyond Malinowski, not to say Tylor and Frazer, in making myth universal and, as presumably is the case for Malinowski, not merely primitive. Neither Malinowski nor Eliade challenges Frazer’s and especially Tylor’s literal reading of myth. By contrast, Malinowski and Eliade reconcile myth with science by recharacterizing the function of myth.

KW - Mircea Eliade

KW - sacred reality

KW - myths

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061695626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315124575

DO - 10.4324/9781315124575

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781412852999

SP - 65

EP - 76

BT - Mircea Eliade

A2 - Babuts, Nicolae

PB - Taylor and Francis AS

CY - New York

ER -