Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide

Scientists' Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and the European Union

Neil J. Mitchell, Kerry G. Herron, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Guy D. Whitten

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Do elites with scientific expertise hold similar policy preferences in technical policy areas irrespective of their ideological and national background? It is expected that elite beliefs will exhibit a higher level of ideological constraint than mass beliefs do, yet we do not know much about the role of ideology and national context in shaping more specific policy preferences. In this research note, we report the findings of an analysis of the influence of ideology and national context on the policy beliefs of scientific elites in the member countries of the European Union and in the United States.

    Recent research on epistemic communities, or ‘networks of knowledge-based experts’, suggests that scientific elites will achieve transnational convergence on policy positions, particularly over complex and technical policy questions: ‘to the extent that epistemic communities make some of the world's problems more amenable to human reason and intervention, they can curb some of the international system's anarchic tendencies, temper some of the excesses of a purely state-centric order, and perhaps even help bring about a better international order’. Nuclear security issues and environmental issues are policy areas identified as amenable to an epistemic communities approach. Earlier research is divided over the degree to which ideology influences scientists' policy beliefs. But there have been no systematic cross-national analyses of the influence of scientific training in suppressing ‘state-centric’ and ideological concerns in the determination of policy preferences.

    With a substantive focus on scientific elites' beliefs and preferences on security and energy policy issues, our aim is to extend this research to a comparative setting and provide a preliminary understanding of the extent to which knowledge and scientific training provide insulation from ideology, patriotism and ‘state-centric’ concerns.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)753-764
    Number of pages12
    JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
    Volume37
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    nuclear policy
    elite
    ideology
    policy area
    community
    energy policy
    patriotism
    international system
    security policy
    expertise
    expert
    knowledge

    Keywords

    • foreign-policy
    • attitudes
    • consensus
    • ideology
    • program

    Cite this

    Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide : Scientists' Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and the European Union. / Mitchell, Neil J.; Herron, Kerry G.; Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.; Whitten, Guy D.

    In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2007, p. 753-764.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mitchell, Neil J. ; Herron, Kerry G. ; Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. ; Whitten, Guy D. / Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide : Scientists' Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and the European Union. In: British Journal of Political Science. 2007 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 753-764.
    @article{b060103f51f74279bbb71689baf900af,
    title = "Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide: Scientists' Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and the European Union",
    abstract = "Do elites with scientific expertise hold similar policy preferences in technical policy areas irrespective of their ideological and national background? It is expected that elite beliefs will exhibit a higher level of ideological constraint than mass beliefs do, yet we do not know much about the role of ideology and national context in shaping more specific policy preferences. In this research note, we report the findings of an analysis of the influence of ideology and national context on the policy beliefs of scientific elites in the member countries of the European Union and in the United States. Recent research on epistemic communities, or ‘networks of knowledge-based experts’, suggests that scientific elites will achieve transnational convergence on policy positions, particularly over complex and technical policy questions: ‘to the extent that epistemic communities make some of the world's problems more amenable to human reason and intervention, they can curb some of the international system's anarchic tendencies, temper some of the excesses of a purely state-centric order, and perhaps even help bring about a better international order’. Nuclear security issues and environmental issues are policy areas identified as amenable to an epistemic communities approach. Earlier research is divided over the degree to which ideology influences scientists' policy beliefs. But there have been no systematic cross-national analyses of the influence of scientific training in suppressing ‘state-centric’ and ideological concerns in the determination of policy preferences. With a substantive focus on scientific elites' beliefs and preferences on security and energy policy issues, our aim is to extend this research to a comparative setting and provide a preliminary understanding of the extent to which knowledge and scientific training provide insulation from ideology, patriotism and ‘state-centric’ concerns.",
    keywords = "foreign-policy, attitudes, consensus, ideology, program",
    author = "Mitchell, {Neil J.} and Herron, {Kerry G.} and Jenkins-Smith, {Hank C.} and Whitten, {Guy D.}",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1017/S0007123407000403",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "753--764",
    journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
    issn = "0007-1234",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide

    T2 - Scientists' Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and the European Union

    AU - Mitchell, Neil J.

    AU - Herron, Kerry G.

    AU - Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.

    AU - Whitten, Guy D.

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Do elites with scientific expertise hold similar policy preferences in technical policy areas irrespective of their ideological and national background? It is expected that elite beliefs will exhibit a higher level of ideological constraint than mass beliefs do, yet we do not know much about the role of ideology and national context in shaping more specific policy preferences. In this research note, we report the findings of an analysis of the influence of ideology and national context on the policy beliefs of scientific elites in the member countries of the European Union and in the United States. Recent research on epistemic communities, or ‘networks of knowledge-based experts’, suggests that scientific elites will achieve transnational convergence on policy positions, particularly over complex and technical policy questions: ‘to the extent that epistemic communities make some of the world's problems more amenable to human reason and intervention, they can curb some of the international system's anarchic tendencies, temper some of the excesses of a purely state-centric order, and perhaps even help bring about a better international order’. Nuclear security issues and environmental issues are policy areas identified as amenable to an epistemic communities approach. Earlier research is divided over the degree to which ideology influences scientists' policy beliefs. But there have been no systematic cross-national analyses of the influence of scientific training in suppressing ‘state-centric’ and ideological concerns in the determination of policy preferences. With a substantive focus on scientific elites' beliefs and preferences on security and energy policy issues, our aim is to extend this research to a comparative setting and provide a preliminary understanding of the extent to which knowledge and scientific training provide insulation from ideology, patriotism and ‘state-centric’ concerns.

    AB - Do elites with scientific expertise hold similar policy preferences in technical policy areas irrespective of their ideological and national background? It is expected that elite beliefs will exhibit a higher level of ideological constraint than mass beliefs do, yet we do not know much about the role of ideology and national context in shaping more specific policy preferences. In this research note, we report the findings of an analysis of the influence of ideology and national context on the policy beliefs of scientific elites in the member countries of the European Union and in the United States. Recent research on epistemic communities, or ‘networks of knowledge-based experts’, suggests that scientific elites will achieve transnational convergence on policy positions, particularly over complex and technical policy questions: ‘to the extent that epistemic communities make some of the world's problems more amenable to human reason and intervention, they can curb some of the international system's anarchic tendencies, temper some of the excesses of a purely state-centric order, and perhaps even help bring about a better international order’. Nuclear security issues and environmental issues are policy areas identified as amenable to an epistemic communities approach. Earlier research is divided over the degree to which ideology influences scientists' policy beliefs. But there have been no systematic cross-national analyses of the influence of scientific training in suppressing ‘state-centric’ and ideological concerns in the determination of policy preferences. With a substantive focus on scientific elites' beliefs and preferences on security and energy policy issues, our aim is to extend this research to a comparative setting and provide a preliminary understanding of the extent to which knowledge and scientific training provide insulation from ideology, patriotism and ‘state-centric’ concerns.

    KW - foreign-policy

    KW - attitudes

    KW - consensus

    KW - ideology

    KW - program

    U2 - 10.1017/S0007123407000403

    DO - 10.1017/S0007123407000403

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 753

    EP - 764

    JO - British Journal of Political Science

    JF - British Journal of Political Science

    SN - 0007-1234

    IS - 4

    ER -