Empirical testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option: The Case of Sleep Apnea

Nicolas Krucien, Amiram Gafni, Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is an increasing use of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method in health care to estimate preferences of individuals and the public for different services. Despite this increasing use, there are few studies that investigate the validity of the DCE in health. This study investigates the external validity of DCE by comparing the predicted treatment choices from the DCE to the actual treatment choices made by the same respondents using a decision board (DB) approach. The sample includes 140 patients who came for a sleep apnea routine visit in a hospital setting. Each respondent answered 10 DCE tasks and 1 DB task. The preferences were estimated with a generalized multinomial logit model and the predicted and actual treatment choices were compared both at the sample and individual levels. The results raise questions about the external validity of DCE in health. At the sample level, the comparison showed large but not significant differences between the two methods. This can be explained in part by the aggregation process that obscures variability in the individuals' preferences. At the individual level, the comparison showed that the two methods led to significantly different patterns of choices. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)951-965
Number of pages15
JournalHealth Economics
Volume24
Issue number8
Early online date1 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

Fingerprint

Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Health
Nuclear Family
Therapeutics
Logistic Models
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • discrete choice experiment
  • decision board
  • external validity
  • stated preferences

Cite this

Empirical testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option : The Case of Sleep Apnea. / Krucien, Nicolas; Gafni, Amiram; Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie.

In: Health Economics, Vol. 24, No. 8, 08.2015, p. 951-965.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krucien, Nicolas ; Gafni, Amiram ; Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie. / Empirical testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option : The Case of Sleep Apnea. In: Health Economics. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 8. pp. 951-965.
@article{04dce3d1e9eb4afaa8b0629e67156dc0,
title = "Empirical testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option: The Case of Sleep Apnea",
abstract = "There is an increasing use of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method in health care to estimate preferences of individuals and the public for different services. Despite this increasing use, there are few studies that investigate the validity of the DCE in health. This study investigates the external validity of DCE by comparing the predicted treatment choices from the DCE to the actual treatment choices made by the same respondents using a decision board (DB) approach. The sample includes 140 patients who came for a sleep apnea routine visit in a hospital setting. Each respondent answered 10 DCE tasks and 1 DB task. The preferences were estimated with a generalized multinomial logit model and the predicted and actual treatment choices were compared both at the sample and individual levels. The results raise questions about the external validity of DCE in health. At the sample level, the comparison showed large but not significant differences between the two methods. This can be explained in part by the aggregation process that obscures variability in the individuals' preferences. At the individual level, the comparison showed that the two methods led to significantly different patterns of choices. Copyright {\circledC} 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "discrete choice experiment, decision board, external validity, stated preferences",
author = "Nicolas Krucien and Amiram Gafni and Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/hec.3076",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "951--965",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1057-9230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option

T2 - The Case of Sleep Apnea

AU - Krucien, Nicolas

AU - Gafni, Amiram

AU - Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie

N1 - Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - There is an increasing use of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method in health care to estimate preferences of individuals and the public for different services. Despite this increasing use, there are few studies that investigate the validity of the DCE in health. This study investigates the external validity of DCE by comparing the predicted treatment choices from the DCE to the actual treatment choices made by the same respondents using a decision board (DB) approach. The sample includes 140 patients who came for a sleep apnea routine visit in a hospital setting. Each respondent answered 10 DCE tasks and 1 DB task. The preferences were estimated with a generalized multinomial logit model and the predicted and actual treatment choices were compared both at the sample and individual levels. The results raise questions about the external validity of DCE in health. At the sample level, the comparison showed large but not significant differences between the two methods. This can be explained in part by the aggregation process that obscures variability in the individuals' preferences. At the individual level, the comparison showed that the two methods led to significantly different patterns of choices. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - There is an increasing use of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method in health care to estimate preferences of individuals and the public for different services. Despite this increasing use, there are few studies that investigate the validity of the DCE in health. This study investigates the external validity of DCE by comparing the predicted treatment choices from the DCE to the actual treatment choices made by the same respondents using a decision board (DB) approach. The sample includes 140 patients who came for a sleep apnea routine visit in a hospital setting. Each respondent answered 10 DCE tasks and 1 DB task. The preferences were estimated with a generalized multinomial logit model and the predicted and actual treatment choices were compared both at the sample and individual levels. The results raise questions about the external validity of DCE in health. At the sample level, the comparison showed large but not significant differences between the two methods. This can be explained in part by the aggregation process that obscures variability in the individuals' preferences. At the individual level, the comparison showed that the two methods led to significantly different patterns of choices. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - discrete choice experiment

KW - decision board

KW - external validity

KW - stated preferences

U2 - 10.1002/hec.3076

DO - 10.1002/hec.3076

M3 - Article

C2 - 24986760

VL - 24

SP - 951

EP - 965

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1057-9230

IS - 8

ER -