Enabling Innovation: Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research

James Leach

Research output: Book/ReportOther Report

Abstract

This paper argues that foundational conditions for research and innovation are of fundamental importance. It is a combination of the research needs, the processes of research, and the relationships generated, that give value to society. That value is created, transferred and experienced through the process of research. This model of social processes is widely applicable, and is true for the other disciplines as well as for the arts and humanities. To understand the value of something you also need to know about the relationships that led to that value. Those relationships, which are essential if innovation is to flourish, are encouraged by the open, public and porous nature of universities. James introduced the concept of citizenship as a way of encapsulating the processes, relationships, and the need for accountability in research. He argued that there is a danger in over-specifying measurements in the value of research as this could distract from the intrinsic processes involved. A critical, descriptive approach would support innovation more than a disengaged system of audit.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon, United Kingdom
PublisherArts & Humanities Research Council
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

art
innovation
Values
social process
audit
citizenship
responsibility
university

Cite this

Leach, J. (2010). Enabling Innovation: Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research. London, United Kingdom: Arts & Humanities Research Council.

Enabling Innovation : Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research. / Leach, James.

London, United Kingdom : Arts & Humanities Research Council, 2010.

Research output: Book/ReportOther Report

Leach, J 2010, Enabling Innovation: Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research. Arts & Humanities Research Council, London, United Kingdom.
Leach J. Enabling Innovation: Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research. London, United Kingdom: Arts & Humanities Research Council, 2010.
Leach, James. / Enabling Innovation : Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research. London, United Kingdom : Arts & Humanities Research Council, 2010.
@book{e3f7e7d835544da5902c0cad6ded654f,
title = "Enabling Innovation: Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research",
abstract = "This paper argues that foundational conditions for research and innovation are of fundamental importance. It is a combination of the research needs, the processes of research, and the relationships generated, that give value to society. That value is created, transferred and experienced through the process of research. This model of social processes is widely applicable, and is true for the other disciplines as well as for the arts and humanities. To understand the value of something you also need to know about the relationships that led to that value. Those relationships, which are essential if innovation is to flourish, are encouraged by the open, public and porous nature of universities. James introduced the concept of citizenship as a way of encapsulating the processes, relationships, and the need for accountability in research. He argued that there is a danger in over-specifying measurements in the value of research as this could distract from the intrinsic processes involved. A critical, descriptive approach would support innovation more than a disengaged system of audit.",
author = "James Leach",
note = "Provocation paper for AHRC Policy Seminar held at The Work Foundation, London, on 5th March 2010",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
language = "English",
publisher = "Arts & Humanities Research Council",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Enabling Innovation

T2 - Creative Investments in Arts and Humanities Research

AU - Leach, James

N1 - Provocation paper for AHRC Policy Seminar held at The Work Foundation, London, on 5th March 2010

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - This paper argues that foundational conditions for research and innovation are of fundamental importance. It is a combination of the research needs, the processes of research, and the relationships generated, that give value to society. That value is created, transferred and experienced through the process of research. This model of social processes is widely applicable, and is true for the other disciplines as well as for the arts and humanities. To understand the value of something you also need to know about the relationships that led to that value. Those relationships, which are essential if innovation is to flourish, are encouraged by the open, public and porous nature of universities. James introduced the concept of citizenship as a way of encapsulating the processes, relationships, and the need for accountability in research. He argued that there is a danger in over-specifying measurements in the value of research as this could distract from the intrinsic processes involved. A critical, descriptive approach would support innovation more than a disengaged system of audit.

AB - This paper argues that foundational conditions for research and innovation are of fundamental importance. It is a combination of the research needs, the processes of research, and the relationships generated, that give value to society. That value is created, transferred and experienced through the process of research. This model of social processes is widely applicable, and is true for the other disciplines as well as for the arts and humanities. To understand the value of something you also need to know about the relationships that led to that value. Those relationships, which are essential if innovation is to flourish, are encouraged by the open, public and porous nature of universities. James introduced the concept of citizenship as a way of encapsulating the processes, relationships, and the need for accountability in research. He argued that there is a danger in over-specifying measurements in the value of research as this could distract from the intrinsic processes involved. A critical, descriptive approach would support innovation more than a disengaged system of audit.

M3 - Other Report

BT - Enabling Innovation

PB - Arts & Humanities Research Council

CY - London, United Kingdom

ER -