Engaging Ethnographic Peace Research

Exploring an Approach

Gearoid Millar (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As has been thoroughly rehearsed in the literature, the failures of the liberal peace model of post-conflict intervention have given rise to a ‘local turn’ in peace research. This in turn has refocused attention away from the motivations and practices of international actors towards local ownership and ‘buy-in’, and the importance of culture, context, and ‘the Everyday’. There is a mismatch, however, between the methodological skills among peace researchers today, and the new imperative to explore local and everyday understandings, perceptions, and experiences of conflict, transition, and peace. For this reason a number of scholars have recently emphasized the importance of incorporating ethnographic methods and an anthropological imagination into peace research. However, at this point, and as evidenced in the contributions to this special issue, there are many challenges to such incorporation which must be acknowledge and addressed if the ethnographic approach is to fulfil its early promise to add empirical substance to the local turn. The contributing authors each address different challenges to conducting Ethnographic Peace Research (EPR) in post-conflict contexts and, as this introduction argues, they evidence clearly the variety of questions yet to be answered while suggesting different ways ethnographic approaches can be incorporated into peace research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)597-609
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Peacekeeping
Volume25
Issue number5
Early online date12 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

peace research
peace
mismatch
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • Peace Research
  • Methodology
  • Ethnography
  • Fieldwork
  • Conflict

Cite this

Engaging Ethnographic Peace Research : Exploring an Approach. / Millar, Gearoid (Corresponding Author).

In: International Peacekeeping, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2018, p. 597-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4195fe95f9e04147b58d1bd4b3c44805,
title = "Engaging Ethnographic Peace Research: Exploring an Approach",
abstract = "As has been thoroughly rehearsed in the literature, the failures of the liberal peace model of post-conflict intervention have given rise to a ‘local turn’ in peace research. This in turn has refocused attention away from the motivations and practices of international actors towards local ownership and ‘buy-in’, and the importance of culture, context, and ‘the Everyday’. There is a mismatch, however, between the methodological skills among peace researchers today, and the new imperative to explore local and everyday understandings, perceptions, and experiences of conflict, transition, and peace. For this reason a number of scholars have recently emphasized the importance of incorporating ethnographic methods and an anthropological imagination into peace research. However, at this point, and as evidenced in the contributions to this special issue, there are many challenges to such incorporation which must be acknowledge and addressed if the ethnographic approach is to fulfil its early promise to add empirical substance to the local turn. The contributing authors each address different challenges to conducting Ethnographic Peace Research (EPR) in post-conflict contexts and, as this introduction argues, they evidence clearly the variety of questions yet to be answered while suggesting different ways ethnographic approaches can be incorporated into peace research.",
keywords = "Peace Research, Methodology, Ethnography, Fieldwork, Conflict",
author = "Gearoid Millar",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/13533312.2018.1521700",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "597--609",
journal = "International Peacekeeping",
issn = "1353-3312",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaging Ethnographic Peace Research

T2 - Exploring an Approach

AU - Millar, Gearoid

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - As has been thoroughly rehearsed in the literature, the failures of the liberal peace model of post-conflict intervention have given rise to a ‘local turn’ in peace research. This in turn has refocused attention away from the motivations and practices of international actors towards local ownership and ‘buy-in’, and the importance of culture, context, and ‘the Everyday’. There is a mismatch, however, between the methodological skills among peace researchers today, and the new imperative to explore local and everyday understandings, perceptions, and experiences of conflict, transition, and peace. For this reason a number of scholars have recently emphasized the importance of incorporating ethnographic methods and an anthropological imagination into peace research. However, at this point, and as evidenced in the contributions to this special issue, there are many challenges to such incorporation which must be acknowledge and addressed if the ethnographic approach is to fulfil its early promise to add empirical substance to the local turn. The contributing authors each address different challenges to conducting Ethnographic Peace Research (EPR) in post-conflict contexts and, as this introduction argues, they evidence clearly the variety of questions yet to be answered while suggesting different ways ethnographic approaches can be incorporated into peace research.

AB - As has been thoroughly rehearsed in the literature, the failures of the liberal peace model of post-conflict intervention have given rise to a ‘local turn’ in peace research. This in turn has refocused attention away from the motivations and practices of international actors towards local ownership and ‘buy-in’, and the importance of culture, context, and ‘the Everyday’. There is a mismatch, however, between the methodological skills among peace researchers today, and the new imperative to explore local and everyday understandings, perceptions, and experiences of conflict, transition, and peace. For this reason a number of scholars have recently emphasized the importance of incorporating ethnographic methods and an anthropological imagination into peace research. However, at this point, and as evidenced in the contributions to this special issue, there are many challenges to such incorporation which must be acknowledge and addressed if the ethnographic approach is to fulfil its early promise to add empirical substance to the local turn. The contributing authors each address different challenges to conducting Ethnographic Peace Research (EPR) in post-conflict contexts and, as this introduction argues, they evidence clearly the variety of questions yet to be answered while suggesting different ways ethnographic approaches can be incorporated into peace research.

KW - Peace Research

KW - Methodology

KW - Ethnography

KW - Fieldwork

KW - Conflict

U2 - 10.1080/13533312.2018.1521700

DO - 10.1080/13533312.2018.1521700

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 597

EP - 609

JO - International Peacekeeping

JF - International Peacekeeping

SN - 1353-3312

IS - 5

ER -