England’s preconception health report: convenient and valuable data

Mairead Black* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Linked article: This is a mini commentary on Schoenaker et al., pp.1187–1195 in this issue To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17436.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1196-1196
Number of pages1
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume130
Issue number10
Early online date13 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Research Funding
Medical Research Council. Grant Number: MR/W014432/1

Access to Document

  • Black_etal_BJOG_England_Preconception_Health_AAM

    This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.

    Accepted author manuscript, 75.7 KBLicence: Unspecified

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'England’s preconception health report: convenient and valuable data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
    View full fingerprint

    Cite this