Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming

Andreas Gattinger, Adrian Muller, Matthias Haeni, Colin Skinner, Andreas Fliessbach, Nina Buchmann, Paul Maeder, Matthias Stolze, Pete Smith, Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Urs Niggli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

241 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been suggested that conversion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quantitative assessment has been lacking. Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming systems were subjected to metaanalysis to identify differences in soil organic carbon (SOC). We found significant differences and higher values for organically farmed soils of 0.18 +/- 0.06% points (mean +/- 95% confidence interval) for SOC concentrations, 3.50 +/- 1.08 Mg C ha(-1) for stocks, and 0.45 +/- 0.21 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1) for sequestration rates compared with nonorganic management. Metaregression did not deliver clear results on drivers, but differences in external C inputs and crop rotations seemed important. Restricting the analysis to zero net input organic systems and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external C and N inputs), the mean difference in SOC stocks between the farming systems was still significant (1.98 +/- 1.50 Mg C ha-1), whereas the difference in sequestration rates became insignificant (0.07 +/- 0.08 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). Analyzing zero net input systems for all data without this quality requirement revealed significant, positive differences in SOC concentrations and stocks (0.13 +/- 0.09% points and 2.16 +/- 1.65 Mg C ha(-1), respectively) and insignificant differences for sequestration rates (0.27 +/- 0.37 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). The data mainly cover top soil and temperate zones, whereas only few data from tropical regions and subsoil horizons exist. Summarizing, this study shows that organic farming has the potential to accumulate soil carbon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18226-18231
Number of pages6
JournalPNAS
Volume109
Issue number44
Early online date15 Oct 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2012

Keywords

  • climate change
  • soil quality
  • agricultural systems

Cite this

Gattinger, A., Muller, A., Haeni, M., Skinner, C., Fliessbach, A., Buchmann, N., ... Niggli, U. (2012). Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. PNAS, 109(44), 18226-18231. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209429109

Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. / Gattinger, Andreas; Muller, Adrian; Haeni, Matthias; Skinner, Colin; Fliessbach, Andreas; Buchmann, Nina; Maeder, Paul; Stolze, Matthias; Smith, Pete; Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage; Niggli, Urs.

In: PNAS, Vol. 109, No. 44, 30.10.2012, p. 18226-18231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gattinger, A, Muller, A, Haeni, M, Skinner, C, Fliessbach, A, Buchmann, N, Maeder, P, Stolze, M, Smith, P, Scialabba, NE-H & Niggli, U 2012, 'Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming', PNAS, vol. 109, no. 44, pp. 18226-18231. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209429109
Gattinger A, Muller A, Haeni M, Skinner C, Fliessbach A, Buchmann N et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. PNAS. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):18226-18231. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209429109
Gattinger, Andreas ; Muller, Adrian ; Haeni, Matthias ; Skinner, Colin ; Fliessbach, Andreas ; Buchmann, Nina ; Maeder, Paul ; Stolze, Matthias ; Smith, Pete ; Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage ; Niggli, Urs. / Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. In: PNAS. 2012 ; Vol. 109, No. 44. pp. 18226-18231.
@article{2acfbcc9ba7147d3b0a2411f9a446d40,
title = "Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming",
abstract = "It has been suggested that conversion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quantitative assessment has been lacking. Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming systems were subjected to metaanalysis to identify differences in soil organic carbon (SOC). We found significant differences and higher values for organically farmed soils of 0.18 +/- 0.06{\%} points (mean +/- 95{\%} confidence interval) for SOC concentrations, 3.50 +/- 1.08 Mg C ha(-1) for stocks, and 0.45 +/- 0.21 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1) for sequestration rates compared with nonorganic management. Metaregression did not deliver clear results on drivers, but differences in external C inputs and crop rotations seemed important. Restricting the analysis to zero net input organic systems and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external C and N inputs), the mean difference in SOC stocks between the farming systems was still significant (1.98 +/- 1.50 Mg C ha-1), whereas the difference in sequestration rates became insignificant (0.07 +/- 0.08 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). Analyzing zero net input systems for all data without this quality requirement revealed significant, positive differences in SOC concentrations and stocks (0.13 +/- 0.09{\%} points and 2.16 +/- 1.65 Mg C ha(-1), respectively) and insignificant differences for sequestration rates (0.27 +/- 0.37 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). The data mainly cover top soil and temperate zones, whereas only few data from tropical regions and subsoil horizons exist. Summarizing, this study shows that organic farming has the potential to accumulate soil carbon.",
keywords = "climate change, soil quality, agricultural systems",
author = "Andreas Gattinger and Adrian Muller and Matthias Haeni and Colin Skinner and Andreas Fliessbach and Nina Buchmann and Paul Maeder and Matthias Stolze and Pete Smith and Scialabba, {Nadia El-Hage} and Urs Niggli",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1209429109",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "18226--18231",
journal = "PNAS",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "NATL ACAD SCIENCES",
number = "44",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming

AU - Gattinger, Andreas

AU - Muller, Adrian

AU - Haeni, Matthias

AU - Skinner, Colin

AU - Fliessbach, Andreas

AU - Buchmann, Nina

AU - Maeder, Paul

AU - Stolze, Matthias

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage

AU - Niggli, Urs

PY - 2012/10/30

Y1 - 2012/10/30

N2 - It has been suggested that conversion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quantitative assessment has been lacking. Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming systems were subjected to metaanalysis to identify differences in soil organic carbon (SOC). We found significant differences and higher values for organically farmed soils of 0.18 +/- 0.06% points (mean +/- 95% confidence interval) for SOC concentrations, 3.50 +/- 1.08 Mg C ha(-1) for stocks, and 0.45 +/- 0.21 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1) for sequestration rates compared with nonorganic management. Metaregression did not deliver clear results on drivers, but differences in external C inputs and crop rotations seemed important. Restricting the analysis to zero net input organic systems and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external C and N inputs), the mean difference in SOC stocks between the farming systems was still significant (1.98 +/- 1.50 Mg C ha-1), whereas the difference in sequestration rates became insignificant (0.07 +/- 0.08 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). Analyzing zero net input systems for all data without this quality requirement revealed significant, positive differences in SOC concentrations and stocks (0.13 +/- 0.09% points and 2.16 +/- 1.65 Mg C ha(-1), respectively) and insignificant differences for sequestration rates (0.27 +/- 0.37 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). The data mainly cover top soil and temperate zones, whereas only few data from tropical regions and subsoil horizons exist. Summarizing, this study shows that organic farming has the potential to accumulate soil carbon.

AB - It has been suggested that conversion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quantitative assessment has been lacking. Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming systems were subjected to metaanalysis to identify differences in soil organic carbon (SOC). We found significant differences and higher values for organically farmed soils of 0.18 +/- 0.06% points (mean +/- 95% confidence interval) for SOC concentrations, 3.50 +/- 1.08 Mg C ha(-1) for stocks, and 0.45 +/- 0.21 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1) for sequestration rates compared with nonorganic management. Metaregression did not deliver clear results on drivers, but differences in external C inputs and crop rotations seemed important. Restricting the analysis to zero net input organic systems and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external C and N inputs), the mean difference in SOC stocks between the farming systems was still significant (1.98 +/- 1.50 Mg C ha-1), whereas the difference in sequestration rates became insignificant (0.07 +/- 0.08 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). Analyzing zero net input systems for all data without this quality requirement revealed significant, positive differences in SOC concentrations and stocks (0.13 +/- 0.09% points and 2.16 +/- 1.65 Mg C ha(-1), respectively) and insignificant differences for sequestration rates (0.27 +/- 0.37 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). The data mainly cover top soil and temperate zones, whereas only few data from tropical regions and subsoil horizons exist. Summarizing, this study shows that organic farming has the potential to accumulate soil carbon.

KW - climate change

KW - soil quality

KW - agricultural systems

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1209429109

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1209429109

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 18226

EP - 18231

JO - PNAS

JF - PNAS

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 44

ER -