Environmental improvement of product supply chains: a review of European retailers’ performance

David Styles, Harald Schoenberger, Jose-Luis Galvez-Martos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Retailers are beginning to accept responsibility for the environmental impacts of their product supply chains. This paper: (i) summarizes the challenges faced by retailers to drive environmental improvement across private-label food, textile, furniture and household chemical products; (ii) provides a review of 25 major European retailers’ best practice actions. Retailers drive environmental improvement of supply chains using third party environmental certification (e.g. Forest Stewardship Council), product performance labelling, environmental requirements for suppliers, and supplier improvement programmes. Proactive retailers go beyond product labelling to use widespread product certification and extensive collaboration with suppliers to drive systematic environmental improvement across product groups associated with high environmental burdens. Quantitative data on sales shares of improved products are patchy but indicate large variations in performance across retailers. Specialist retailers and smaller cooperative retailers tend to be front-runners in supply chain improvement, whilst very large and price-led grocery retailers tend to be laggards. These differences partly reflect logistical and market positioning difficulties for the latter types of retailer to shift towards sustainable sourcing, but also different perspectives on responsibility. Front-runner retailers accept a high degree of responsibility for supply chain sustainability compared with laggard retailers who tend to place the onus on consumers to drive environmental improvement across supply chains.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-78
Number of pages22
JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

certification
positioning
product
Retailers
Supply chain
environmental impact
sustainability
market
food
responsibility
labelling
Suppliers
Responsibility
chemical product
household chemical
textile
price
furniture
programme
Labeling

Keywords

  • retail
  • supply chain
  • green procurement
  • environmental management
  • ecolabels
  • sustainability

Cite this

Environmental improvement of product supply chains : a review of European retailers’ performance. / Styles, David; Schoenberger, Harald; Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis.

In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 65, 08.2012, p. 57-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Styles, David ; Schoenberger, Harald ; Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis. / Environmental improvement of product supply chains : a review of European retailers’ performance. In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2012 ; Vol. 65. pp. 57-78.
@article{9934fe6332724fb0b524c59207205c7b,
title = "Environmental improvement of product supply chains: a review of European retailers’ performance",
abstract = "Retailers are beginning to accept responsibility for the environmental impacts of their product supply chains. This paper: (i) summarizes the challenges faced by retailers to drive environmental improvement across private-label food, textile, furniture and household chemical products; (ii) provides a review of 25 major European retailers’ best practice actions. Retailers drive environmental improvement of supply chains using third party environmental certification (e.g. Forest Stewardship Council), product performance labelling, environmental requirements for suppliers, and supplier improvement programmes. Proactive retailers go beyond product labelling to use widespread product certification and extensive collaboration with suppliers to drive systematic environmental improvement across product groups associated with high environmental burdens. Quantitative data on sales shares of improved products are patchy but indicate large variations in performance across retailers. Specialist retailers and smaller cooperative retailers tend to be front-runners in supply chain improvement, whilst very large and price-led grocery retailers tend to be laggards. These differences partly reflect logistical and market positioning difficulties for the latter types of retailer to shift towards sustainable sourcing, but also different perspectives on responsibility. Front-runner retailers accept a high degree of responsibility for supply chain sustainability compared with laggard retailers who tend to place the onus on consumers to drive environmental improvement across supply chains.",
keywords = "retail, supply chain, green procurement, environmental management, ecolabels, sustainability",
author = "David Styles and Harald Schoenberger and Jose-Luis Galvez-Martos",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "57--78",
journal = "Resources, Conservation and Recycling",
issn = "0921-3449",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental improvement of product supply chains

T2 - a review of European retailers’ performance

AU - Styles, David

AU - Schoenberger, Harald

AU - Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Retailers are beginning to accept responsibility for the environmental impacts of their product supply chains. This paper: (i) summarizes the challenges faced by retailers to drive environmental improvement across private-label food, textile, furniture and household chemical products; (ii) provides a review of 25 major European retailers’ best practice actions. Retailers drive environmental improvement of supply chains using third party environmental certification (e.g. Forest Stewardship Council), product performance labelling, environmental requirements for suppliers, and supplier improvement programmes. Proactive retailers go beyond product labelling to use widespread product certification and extensive collaboration with suppliers to drive systematic environmental improvement across product groups associated with high environmental burdens. Quantitative data on sales shares of improved products are patchy but indicate large variations in performance across retailers. Specialist retailers and smaller cooperative retailers tend to be front-runners in supply chain improvement, whilst very large and price-led grocery retailers tend to be laggards. These differences partly reflect logistical and market positioning difficulties for the latter types of retailer to shift towards sustainable sourcing, but also different perspectives on responsibility. Front-runner retailers accept a high degree of responsibility for supply chain sustainability compared with laggard retailers who tend to place the onus on consumers to drive environmental improvement across supply chains.

AB - Retailers are beginning to accept responsibility for the environmental impacts of their product supply chains. This paper: (i) summarizes the challenges faced by retailers to drive environmental improvement across private-label food, textile, furniture and household chemical products; (ii) provides a review of 25 major European retailers’ best practice actions. Retailers drive environmental improvement of supply chains using third party environmental certification (e.g. Forest Stewardship Council), product performance labelling, environmental requirements for suppliers, and supplier improvement programmes. Proactive retailers go beyond product labelling to use widespread product certification and extensive collaboration with suppliers to drive systematic environmental improvement across product groups associated with high environmental burdens. Quantitative data on sales shares of improved products are patchy but indicate large variations in performance across retailers. Specialist retailers and smaller cooperative retailers tend to be front-runners in supply chain improvement, whilst very large and price-led grocery retailers tend to be laggards. These differences partly reflect logistical and market positioning difficulties for the latter types of retailer to shift towards sustainable sourcing, but also different perspectives on responsibility. Front-runner retailers accept a high degree of responsibility for supply chain sustainability compared with laggard retailers who tend to place the onus on consumers to drive environmental improvement across supply chains.

KW - retail

KW - supply chain

KW - green procurement

KW - environmental management

KW - ecolabels

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 57

EP - 78

JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

SN - 0921-3449

ER -