Environmental valuation, public deliberation and their pragmatic synthesis: A critical appraisal

Clive Laurenece Spash, S. Niemeyer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    88 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative-participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)567-585
    Number of pages18
    JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • CONTINGENT VALUATION
    • DECISION-MAKING
    • POLICY
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • CONCEPTION
    • ECOSYSTEMS
    • DEMOCRACY
    • DISCOURSE
    • ECONOMICS
    • VALUES

    Cite this