Environmental valuation, public deliberation and their pragmatic synthesis: A critical appraisal

Clive Laurenece Spash, S. Niemeyer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    82 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative-participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)567-585
    Number of pages18
    JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • CONTINGENT VALUATION
    • DECISION-MAKING
    • POLICY
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • CONCEPTION
    • ECOSYSTEMS
    • DEMOCRACY
    • DISCOURSE
    • ECONOMICS
    • VALUES

    Cite this

    Environmental valuation, public deliberation and their pragmatic synthesis: A critical appraisal. / Spash, Clive Laurenece; Niemeyer, S.

    In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2001, p. 567-585.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{94cdb906a1f14c88baea8971ebc4a529,
    title = "Environmental valuation, public deliberation and their pragmatic synthesis: A critical appraisal",
    abstract = "This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative-participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.",
    keywords = "CONTINGENT VALUATION, DECISION-MAKING, POLICY, SUSTAINABILITY, CONCEPTION, ECOSYSTEMS, DEMOCRACY, DISCOURSE, ECONOMICS, VALUES",
    author = "Spash, {Clive Laurenece} and S. Niemeyer",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1068/c1904ed",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "567--585",
    journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
    issn = "0263-774X",
    publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Environmental valuation, public deliberation and their pragmatic synthesis: A critical appraisal

    AU - Spash, Clive Laurenece

    AU - Niemeyer, S.

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative-participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

    AB - This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative-participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

    KW - CONTINGENT VALUATION

    KW - DECISION-MAKING

    KW - POLICY

    KW - SUSTAINABILITY

    KW - CONCEPTION

    KW - ECOSYSTEMS

    KW - DEMOCRACY

    KW - DISCOURSE

    KW - ECONOMICS

    KW - VALUES

    U2 - 10.1068/c1904ed

    DO - 10.1068/c1904ed

    M3 - Article

    VL - 19

    SP - 567

    EP - 585

    JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

    JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

    SN - 0263-774X

    IS - 4

    ER -