Estimating Body Mass in Dogs and Wolves Using Cranial and Mandibular Dimensions: Application to Siberian Canids

R J Losey, B. Osipov, R. Sivakumaran, T. Nomokonova, E. V. Kovychev, G. Diatchina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previously developed regression formulae for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves based on cranial and mandibular dimensions are evaluated using modern canid specimens of known weight at death. Some of these equations proved reliable, but others have large standard errors of estimate and likely produce unreliable mass estimates. New sets of equations for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves are produced using our datasets, including a set of equations developed from combining the dog and wolf biometric data into a single population. The resulting regression equations allow body mass to be estimated from a series of cranial and mandibular dimensions with relatively low errors. Further, our datasets include larger numbers of specimens of larger ranges of body mass than in these previous studies. When the equations are applied to a suite of dogs and one wolf from Eastern Siberia, several patterns emerge. First, hunter–gatherers’ dogs in this region vary widely in terms of body size, even within a limited geographic area and time period. Some were quite large, similar in size to modern Siberian huskies. Second, pastoralists’ dogs are less variable in terms of body mass, but this may reflect the nature of our samples. In particular, pastoralists’ dogs nearly all were sacrificed juvenile dogs, some of which appear to have been eaten. These dogs seem to have been approached adult body size when they were selected for sacrifice. Finally, our findings help to highlight the need for further refinement in methods used to study ancient canid remains. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)946-959
Number of pages14
JournalInternational journal of osteoarchaeology
Volume25
Issue number6
Early online date13 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

ancient studies
regression
Siberia
Dog
Canids
death
Equations
Pastoralists
Body Size
time
biometrics
Biometrics

Keywords

  • dogs
  • wolves
  • body mass
  • canids
  • Siberia
  • Russia
  • domestication

Cite this

Estimating Body Mass in Dogs and Wolves Using Cranial and Mandibular Dimensions : Application to Siberian Canids. / Losey, R J; Osipov, B. ; Sivakumaran, R. ; Nomokonova, T. ; Kovychev, E. V. ; Diatchina, G. .

In: International journal of osteoarchaeology, Vol. 25, No. 6, 11.2015, p. 946-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Losey, RJ, Osipov, B, Sivakumaran, R, Nomokonova, T, Kovychev, EV & Diatchina, G 2015, 'Estimating Body Mass in Dogs and Wolves Using Cranial and Mandibular Dimensions: Application to Siberian Canids', International journal of osteoarchaeology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 946-959. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2386
Losey, R J ; Osipov, B. ; Sivakumaran, R. ; Nomokonova, T. ; Kovychev, E. V. ; Diatchina, G. . / Estimating Body Mass in Dogs and Wolves Using Cranial and Mandibular Dimensions : Application to Siberian Canids. In: International journal of osteoarchaeology. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 946-959.
@article{30edf6d5d6674154a73d7ab484abf9cc,
title = "Estimating Body Mass in Dogs and Wolves Using Cranial and Mandibular Dimensions: Application to Siberian Canids",
abstract = "Previously developed regression formulae for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves based on cranial and mandibular dimensions are evaluated using modern canid specimens of known weight at death. Some of these equations proved reliable, but others have large standard errors of estimate and likely produce unreliable mass estimates. New sets of equations for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves are produced using our datasets, including a set of equations developed from combining the dog and wolf biometric data into a single population. The resulting regression equations allow body mass to be estimated from a series of cranial and mandibular dimensions with relatively low errors. Further, our datasets include larger numbers of specimens of larger ranges of body mass than in these previous studies. When the equations are applied to a suite of dogs and one wolf from Eastern Siberia, several patterns emerge. First, hunter–gatherers’ dogs in this region vary widely in terms of body size, even within a limited geographic area and time period. Some were quite large, similar in size to modern Siberian huskies. Second, pastoralists’ dogs are less variable in terms of body mass, but this may reflect the nature of our samples. In particular, pastoralists’ dogs nearly all were sacrificed juvenile dogs, some of which appear to have been eaten. These dogs seem to have been approached adult body size when they were selected for sacrifice. Finally, our findings help to highlight the need for further refinement in methods used to study ancient canid remains. Copyright {\circledC} 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "dogs, wolves , body mass , canids , Siberia , Russia , domestication",
author = "Losey, {R J} and B. Osipov and R. Sivakumaran and T. Nomokonova and Kovychev, {E. V.} and G. Diatchina",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/oa.2386",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "946--959",
journal = "International journal of osteoarchaeology",
issn = "1047-482X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating Body Mass in Dogs and Wolves Using Cranial and Mandibular Dimensions

T2 - Application to Siberian Canids

AU - Losey, R J

AU - Osipov, B.

AU - Sivakumaran, R.

AU - Nomokonova, T.

AU - Kovychev, E. V.

AU - Diatchina, G.

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Previously developed regression formulae for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves based on cranial and mandibular dimensions are evaluated using modern canid specimens of known weight at death. Some of these equations proved reliable, but others have large standard errors of estimate and likely produce unreliable mass estimates. New sets of equations for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves are produced using our datasets, including a set of equations developed from combining the dog and wolf biometric data into a single population. The resulting regression equations allow body mass to be estimated from a series of cranial and mandibular dimensions with relatively low errors. Further, our datasets include larger numbers of specimens of larger ranges of body mass than in these previous studies. When the equations are applied to a suite of dogs and one wolf from Eastern Siberia, several patterns emerge. First, hunter–gatherers’ dogs in this region vary widely in terms of body size, even within a limited geographic area and time period. Some were quite large, similar in size to modern Siberian huskies. Second, pastoralists’ dogs are less variable in terms of body mass, but this may reflect the nature of our samples. In particular, pastoralists’ dogs nearly all were sacrificed juvenile dogs, some of which appear to have been eaten. These dogs seem to have been approached adult body size when they were selected for sacrifice. Finally, our findings help to highlight the need for further refinement in methods used to study ancient canid remains. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Previously developed regression formulae for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves based on cranial and mandibular dimensions are evaluated using modern canid specimens of known weight at death. Some of these equations proved reliable, but others have large standard errors of estimate and likely produce unreliable mass estimates. New sets of equations for estimating body mass in dogs and wolves are produced using our datasets, including a set of equations developed from combining the dog and wolf biometric data into a single population. The resulting regression equations allow body mass to be estimated from a series of cranial and mandibular dimensions with relatively low errors. Further, our datasets include larger numbers of specimens of larger ranges of body mass than in these previous studies. When the equations are applied to a suite of dogs and one wolf from Eastern Siberia, several patterns emerge. First, hunter–gatherers’ dogs in this region vary widely in terms of body size, even within a limited geographic area and time period. Some were quite large, similar in size to modern Siberian huskies. Second, pastoralists’ dogs are less variable in terms of body mass, but this may reflect the nature of our samples. In particular, pastoralists’ dogs nearly all were sacrificed juvenile dogs, some of which appear to have been eaten. These dogs seem to have been approached adult body size when they were selected for sacrifice. Finally, our findings help to highlight the need for further refinement in methods used to study ancient canid remains. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - dogs

KW - wolves

KW - body mass

KW - canids

KW - Siberia

KW - Russia

KW - domestication

U2 - 10.1002/oa.2386

DO - 10.1002/oa.2386

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 946

EP - 959

JO - International journal of osteoarchaeology

JF - International journal of osteoarchaeology

SN - 1047-482X

IS - 6

ER -