Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production

Sam St Clair, Jonathan Hillier, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Full greenhouse gas (GHG) life-cycle analysis of bio-energy production chains is often constrained by a lack of information on pre-harvest GHG costs and emissions during production of the energy crop. In this paper, we assessed pre-harvest GHG costs of production of short rotation coppice (SRC), Miscanthus and oil seed rape (OSR: for liquid bio-fuel production) when compared to a range of former land-use baselines. It was found that GHG costs are very low for Miscanthus and SRC but higher for OSR production, determined mainly by the need for nitrogen fertilisation. Compared to baseline land uses, SRC and Miscanthus have much lower GHG costs than arable cropping or intensively managed grasslands, with OSR production having similar GHG costs to arable cropping. Establishing broadleaved forests have low GHG costs, but 5-year GHG costs of Miscanthus and SRC are similar to forest. We show that former land use is of critical importance when determining if energy crops are a net source or sink of GHGs. Converting to SRC and Miscanthus are the most favourable energy crops in terms of GHG savings. Converting to OSR from arable cropping results in either small increases or decreases in GHG emissions, depending upon the former tillage practice on the arable land, but replacing either broadleaved woodland with OSR (mainly due to soil carbon loss and increased fertiliser-related N2O emissions), or grassland with OSR (mainly due to loss of soil carbon), greatly increases emissions. Policies to maximise GHG benefits from energy crops should encourage that they be established preferentially on croplands. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-452
Number of pages11
JournalBiomass & Bioenergy
Volume32
Issue number5
Early online date20 Feb 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Keywords

  • greenhouse gas
  • carbon dioxide
  • nitrous oxide
  • methane
  • energy crop
  • short rotation coppice
  • Miscanthus
  • oil seed rape
  • bio-energy
  • bio-diesel
  • Miscanthus-x-giganteus
  • small-scale production
  • comparing large-scale
  • renewable energy
  • Swedish conditions
  • biomass energy
  • combustion
  • cultivation
  • systems
  • impacts
  • Greenhouse gas

Cite this

Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production. / St Clair, Sam; Hillier, Jonathan; Smith, Pete.

In: Biomass & Bioenergy, Vol. 32, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 442-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

St Clair, Sam ; Hillier, Jonathan ; Smith, Pete. / Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production. In: Biomass & Bioenergy. 2008 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 442-452.
@article{d18a36a68de14f32868b9368621f7d0b,
title = "Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production",
abstract = "Full greenhouse gas (GHG) life-cycle analysis of bio-energy production chains is often constrained by a lack of information on pre-harvest GHG costs and emissions during production of the energy crop. In this paper, we assessed pre-harvest GHG costs of production of short rotation coppice (SRC), Miscanthus and oil seed rape (OSR: for liquid bio-fuel production) when compared to a range of former land-use baselines. It was found that GHG costs are very low for Miscanthus and SRC but higher for OSR production, determined mainly by the need for nitrogen fertilisation. Compared to baseline land uses, SRC and Miscanthus have much lower GHG costs than arable cropping or intensively managed grasslands, with OSR production having similar GHG costs to arable cropping. Establishing broadleaved forests have low GHG costs, but 5-year GHG costs of Miscanthus and SRC are similar to forest. We show that former land use is of critical importance when determining if energy crops are a net source or sink of GHGs. Converting to SRC and Miscanthus are the most favourable energy crops in terms of GHG savings. Converting to OSR from arable cropping results in either small increases or decreases in GHG emissions, depending upon the former tillage practice on the arable land, but replacing either broadleaved woodland with OSR (mainly due to soil carbon loss and increased fertiliser-related N2O emissions), or grassland with OSR (mainly due to loss of soil carbon), greatly increases emissions. Policies to maximise GHG benefits from energy crops should encourage that they be established preferentially on croplands. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights",
keywords = "greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, energy crop, short rotation coppice, Miscanthus, oil seed rape, bio-energy, bio-diesel, Miscanthus-x-giganteus, small-scale production, comparing large-scale, renewable energy, Swedish conditions, biomass energy, combustion, cultivation, systems, impacts, Greenhouse gas",
author = "{St Clair}, Sam and Jonathan Hillier and Pete Smith",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "442--452",
journal = "Biomass & Bioenergy",
issn = "0961-9534",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production

AU - St Clair, Sam

AU - Hillier, Jonathan

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Full greenhouse gas (GHG) life-cycle analysis of bio-energy production chains is often constrained by a lack of information on pre-harvest GHG costs and emissions during production of the energy crop. In this paper, we assessed pre-harvest GHG costs of production of short rotation coppice (SRC), Miscanthus and oil seed rape (OSR: for liquid bio-fuel production) when compared to a range of former land-use baselines. It was found that GHG costs are very low for Miscanthus and SRC but higher for OSR production, determined mainly by the need for nitrogen fertilisation. Compared to baseline land uses, SRC and Miscanthus have much lower GHG costs than arable cropping or intensively managed grasslands, with OSR production having similar GHG costs to arable cropping. Establishing broadleaved forests have low GHG costs, but 5-year GHG costs of Miscanthus and SRC are similar to forest. We show that former land use is of critical importance when determining if energy crops are a net source or sink of GHGs. Converting to SRC and Miscanthus are the most favourable energy crops in terms of GHG savings. Converting to OSR from arable cropping results in either small increases or decreases in GHG emissions, depending upon the former tillage practice on the arable land, but replacing either broadleaved woodland with OSR (mainly due to soil carbon loss and increased fertiliser-related N2O emissions), or grassland with OSR (mainly due to loss of soil carbon), greatly increases emissions. Policies to maximise GHG benefits from energy crops should encourage that they be established preferentially on croplands. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights

AB - Full greenhouse gas (GHG) life-cycle analysis of bio-energy production chains is often constrained by a lack of information on pre-harvest GHG costs and emissions during production of the energy crop. In this paper, we assessed pre-harvest GHG costs of production of short rotation coppice (SRC), Miscanthus and oil seed rape (OSR: for liquid bio-fuel production) when compared to a range of former land-use baselines. It was found that GHG costs are very low for Miscanthus and SRC but higher for OSR production, determined mainly by the need for nitrogen fertilisation. Compared to baseline land uses, SRC and Miscanthus have much lower GHG costs than arable cropping or intensively managed grasslands, with OSR production having similar GHG costs to arable cropping. Establishing broadleaved forests have low GHG costs, but 5-year GHG costs of Miscanthus and SRC are similar to forest. We show that former land use is of critical importance when determining if energy crops are a net source or sink of GHGs. Converting to SRC and Miscanthus are the most favourable energy crops in terms of GHG savings. Converting to OSR from arable cropping results in either small increases or decreases in GHG emissions, depending upon the former tillage practice on the arable land, but replacing either broadleaved woodland with OSR (mainly due to soil carbon loss and increased fertiliser-related N2O emissions), or grassland with OSR (mainly due to loss of soil carbon), greatly increases emissions. Policies to maximise GHG benefits from energy crops should encourage that they be established preferentially on croplands. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights

KW - greenhouse gas

KW - carbon dioxide

KW - nitrous oxide

KW - methane

KW - energy crop

KW - short rotation coppice

KW - Miscanthus

KW - oil seed rape

KW - bio-energy

KW - bio-diesel

KW - Miscanthus-x-giganteus

KW - small-scale production

KW - comparing large-scale

KW - renewable energy

KW - Swedish conditions

KW - biomass energy

KW - combustion

KW - cultivation

KW - systems

KW - impacts

KW - Greenhouse gas

U2 - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 442

EP - 452

JO - Biomass & Bioenergy

JF - Biomass & Bioenergy

SN - 0961-9534

IS - 5

ER -