European organizations and minority rights in Europe

on transforming the securitization dynamic

David Galbreath, Joanne McEvoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-284
Number of pages18
JournalSecurity Dialogue
Volume43
Issue number3
Early online date8 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

minority rights
EU
ethnic relations
Council of Europe
OSCE
ethnic group
human rights
minority
democracy
narrative
ability

Keywords

  • social security
  • minority rights
  • securitization
  • enlargement
  • European security

Cite this

European organizations and minority rights in Europe : on transforming the securitization dynamic. / Galbreath, David; McEvoy, Joanne.

In: Security Dialogue, Vol. 43, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 267-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47c8e065df75495f8cfef7c24c139cb7,
title = "European organizations and minority rights in Europe: on transforming the securitization dynamic",
abstract = "Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.",
keywords = "social security, minority rights, securitization, enlargement, European security",
author = "David Galbreath and Joanne McEvoy",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0967010612444149",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "267--284",
journal = "Security Dialogue",
issn = "0967-0106",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - European organizations and minority rights in Europe

T2 - on transforming the securitization dynamic

AU - Galbreath, David

AU - McEvoy, Joanne

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.

AB - Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.

KW - social security

KW - minority rights

KW - securitization

KW - enlargement

KW - European security

U2 - 10.1177/0967010612444149

DO - 10.1177/0967010612444149

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 267

EP - 284

JO - Security Dialogue

JF - Security Dialogue

SN - 0967-0106

IS - 3

ER -