Europe’s electricity regime

Restoration or thorough transition

Aviel Verbruggen*, Rosaria Di Nucci, Manfred Fischedick, Reinhard Haas, Frede Hvelplund, Volkmar Lauber, Arturo Lorenzonis, Lutz Mez, Lars J. Nilsson, Pablo Del Rio Gonzalez, Joachim Schleich, David Toke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concerns about climate change, diminishing social acceptance of traditional fuels, and technological innovations have led several countries to pursue energy transition strategies, typically by massive diffusion of renewable electricity supplies. The German ‘Energiewende’ has been successful so far in terms of deploying renewable power, mainly by applying particular feed-in tariffs, and by bundling public, academic, industrial and political support. So far though, only few EU member states proceed with a similar transition. In March 2014 CEOs of Europe’s major energy companies publicly opposed a fast and thorough transformation of electricity supplies to become fully renewable. In April 2014 the European Commission published new state aid guidelines, generally mandating renewable energy support mechanisms (premiums, tenders) of lesser performance than regularly adjusted, specific feed-in tariffs. The new guidelines are likely to be pernicious for the fast deployment of renewable electricity supplies. In light of these challenges, this position paper highlights two implications of power sector transitions. First, the engineering-economics theory of power generation systems needs fundamental revision, mainly since a growing share of power sources no longer function on command. Second, and based on the experience in Germany, the paper sketches out a strategy for a thorough transition of the power sector, which, in the end, also entails normative judgements. Deep changes in energy systems and associated ways of living require societal consensus building based on ethical considerations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-68
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

electricity supply
electricity
restoration
Restoration
Electricity
regime
energy
Climate change
Power generation
political support
economic theory
EU member state
European Commission
renewable energy
technical innovation
Innovation
premium
power generation
aid
Economics

Keywords

  • Electricity industry transition
  • Energiewende
  • EU energy state aid guidelines
  • Polluter pays principle
  • Renewable electricity support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Europe’s electricity regime : Restoration or thorough transition. / Verbruggen, Aviel; Di Nucci, Rosaria; Fischedick, Manfred; Haas, Reinhard; Hvelplund, Frede; Lauber, Volkmar; Lorenzonis, Arturo; Mez, Lutz; Nilsson, Lars J.; Del Rio Gonzalez, Pablo; Schleich, Joachim; Toke, David.

In: International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, Vol. 5, 2015, p. 57-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verbruggen, A, Di Nucci, R, Fischedick, M, Haas, R, Hvelplund, F, Lauber, V, Lorenzonis, A, Mez, L, Nilsson, LJ, Del Rio Gonzalez, P, Schleich, J & Toke, D 2015, 'Europe’s electricity regime: Restoration or thorough transition', International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, vol. 5, pp. 57-68. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2015.5.6
Verbruggen, Aviel ; Di Nucci, Rosaria ; Fischedick, Manfred ; Haas, Reinhard ; Hvelplund, Frede ; Lauber, Volkmar ; Lorenzonis, Arturo ; Mez, Lutz ; Nilsson, Lars J. ; Del Rio Gonzalez, Pablo ; Schleich, Joachim ; Toke, David. / Europe’s electricity regime : Restoration or thorough transition. In: International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management. 2015 ; Vol. 5. pp. 57-68.
@article{bbf2bc953092476b89670bccd7409cfb,
title = "Europe’s electricity regime: Restoration or thorough transition",
abstract = "Concerns about climate change, diminishing social acceptance of traditional fuels, and technological innovations have led several countries to pursue energy transition strategies, typically by massive diffusion of renewable electricity supplies. The German ‘Energiewende’ has been successful so far in terms of deploying renewable power, mainly by applying particular feed-in tariffs, and by bundling public, academic, industrial and political support. So far though, only few EU member states proceed with a similar transition. In March 2014 CEOs of Europe’s major energy companies publicly opposed a fast and thorough transformation of electricity supplies to become fully renewable. In April 2014 the European Commission published new state aid guidelines, generally mandating renewable energy support mechanisms (premiums, tenders) of lesser performance than regularly adjusted, specific feed-in tariffs. The new guidelines are likely to be pernicious for the fast deployment of renewable electricity supplies. In light of these challenges, this position paper highlights two implications of power sector transitions. First, the engineering-economics theory of power generation systems needs fundamental revision, mainly since a growing share of power sources no longer function on command. Second, and based on the experience in Germany, the paper sketches out a strategy for a thorough transition of the power sector, which, in the end, also entails normative judgements. Deep changes in energy systems and associated ways of living require societal consensus building based on ethical considerations.",
keywords = "Electricity industry transition, Energiewende, EU energy state aid guidelines, Polluter pays principle, Renewable electricity support",
author = "Aviel Verbruggen and {Di Nucci}, Rosaria and Manfred Fischedick and Reinhard Haas and Frede Hvelplund and Volkmar Lauber and Arturo Lorenzonis and Lutz Mez and Nilsson, {Lars J.} and {Del Rio Gonzalez}, Pablo and Joachim Schleich and David Toke",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.5278/ijsepm.2015.5.6",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "57--68",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management",
issn = "2246-2929",
publisher = "Aalborg University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Europe’s electricity regime

T2 - Restoration or thorough transition

AU - Verbruggen, Aviel

AU - Di Nucci, Rosaria

AU - Fischedick, Manfred

AU - Haas, Reinhard

AU - Hvelplund, Frede

AU - Lauber, Volkmar

AU - Lorenzonis, Arturo

AU - Mez, Lutz

AU - Nilsson, Lars J.

AU - Del Rio Gonzalez, Pablo

AU - Schleich, Joachim

AU - Toke, David

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Concerns about climate change, diminishing social acceptance of traditional fuels, and technological innovations have led several countries to pursue energy transition strategies, typically by massive diffusion of renewable electricity supplies. The German ‘Energiewende’ has been successful so far in terms of deploying renewable power, mainly by applying particular feed-in tariffs, and by bundling public, academic, industrial and political support. So far though, only few EU member states proceed with a similar transition. In March 2014 CEOs of Europe’s major energy companies publicly opposed a fast and thorough transformation of electricity supplies to become fully renewable. In April 2014 the European Commission published new state aid guidelines, generally mandating renewable energy support mechanisms (premiums, tenders) of lesser performance than regularly adjusted, specific feed-in tariffs. The new guidelines are likely to be pernicious for the fast deployment of renewable electricity supplies. In light of these challenges, this position paper highlights two implications of power sector transitions. First, the engineering-economics theory of power generation systems needs fundamental revision, mainly since a growing share of power sources no longer function on command. Second, and based on the experience in Germany, the paper sketches out a strategy for a thorough transition of the power sector, which, in the end, also entails normative judgements. Deep changes in energy systems and associated ways of living require societal consensus building based on ethical considerations.

AB - Concerns about climate change, diminishing social acceptance of traditional fuels, and technological innovations have led several countries to pursue energy transition strategies, typically by massive diffusion of renewable electricity supplies. The German ‘Energiewende’ has been successful so far in terms of deploying renewable power, mainly by applying particular feed-in tariffs, and by bundling public, academic, industrial and political support. So far though, only few EU member states proceed with a similar transition. In March 2014 CEOs of Europe’s major energy companies publicly opposed a fast and thorough transformation of electricity supplies to become fully renewable. In April 2014 the European Commission published new state aid guidelines, generally mandating renewable energy support mechanisms (premiums, tenders) of lesser performance than regularly adjusted, specific feed-in tariffs. The new guidelines are likely to be pernicious for the fast deployment of renewable electricity supplies. In light of these challenges, this position paper highlights two implications of power sector transitions. First, the engineering-economics theory of power generation systems needs fundamental revision, mainly since a growing share of power sources no longer function on command. Second, and based on the experience in Germany, the paper sketches out a strategy for a thorough transition of the power sector, which, in the end, also entails normative judgements. Deep changes in energy systems and associated ways of living require societal consensus building based on ethical considerations.

KW - Electricity industry transition

KW - Energiewende

KW - EU energy state aid guidelines

KW - Polluter pays principle

KW - Renewable electricity support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994225835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5278/ijsepm.2015.5.6

DO - 10.5278/ijsepm.2015.5.6

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 57

EP - 68

JO - International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management

JF - International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management

SN - 2246-2929

ER -