Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity

Andrew Grey; Mark Bolland; Alison Avenell

doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6

Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity

Andrew Grey^*, Mark Bolland, Alison Avenell

^*Corresponding author for this work

University of Auckland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We provide additional information relevant to our previous publication on the quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions. Despite concerns being raised about ethical oversight of research published by a group of researchers, each of the four institutional investigations failed to determine and/or report whether ethics committee approval was obtained for the majority of publications assessed.

Original language	English
Article number	22
Journal	Research integrity and peer review
Volume	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6
Publication status	Published - 6 Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding
No funding supported this work.

Access to Document

10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6Licence: CC BY

Grey_EvaluatingEthicsOversight_VOR
The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Final published version, 474 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{d8df07a5c3f243e6a0841a28e9a5a3eb,

title = "Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity",

abstract = "We provide additional information relevant to our previous publication on the quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions. Despite concerns being raised about ethical oversight of research published by a group of researchers, each of the four institutional investigations failed to determine and/or report whether ethics committee approval was obtained for the majority of publications assessed.",

author = "Andrew Grey and Mark Bolland and Alison Avenell",

note = "Funding No funding supported this work. ",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

journal = "Research integrity and peer review",

issn = "2058-8615",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity

AU - Grey, Andrew

AU - Bolland, Mark

AU - Avenell, Alison

N1 - Funding No funding supported this work.

PY - 2019/11/6

Y1 - 2019/11/6

N2 - We provide additional information relevant to our previous publication on the quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions. Despite concerns being raised about ethical oversight of research published by a group of researchers, each of the four institutional investigations failed to determine and/or report whether ethics committee approval was obtained for the majority of publications assessed.

AB - We provide additional information relevant to our previous publication on the quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions. Despite concerns being raised about ethical oversight of research published by a group of researchers, each of the four institutional investigations failed to determine and/or report whether ethics committee approval was obtained for the majority of publications assessed.

U2 - 10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6

DO - 10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6

M3 - Letter

C2 - 31720010

SN - 2058-8615

VL - 4

JO - Research integrity and peer review

JF - Research integrity and peer review

M1 - 22

ER -

Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this