Evaluating the efficacy of independent versus simultaneous management strategies to address ecological and genetic threats to population viability

Amanda E. Trask* (Corresponding Author), Sarah R. Fenn, Eric M. Bignal, Davy I. McCracken, Pat Monaghan, Jane M. Reid

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

1. Small, declining populations can face simultaneous, interacting ecological and genetic threats to viability. Conservation management strategies designed to tackle such threats independently may then prove ineffective. Population viability analyses that evaluate the efficacy of management strategies implemented independently versus simultaneously are then essential to the design of effective management plans, yet such quantitative evaluations are typically lacking.

2. We used stochastic individual-based models, parameterised with high-quality multi-year demographic and genetic data, to evaluate the efficacy of independent or simultaneous ecological (supplementary feeding) and genetic (translocations to alleviate inbreeding) management strategies for a red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) population of major conservation concern. This population is experiencing ecological threats from food limitation and genetic threats from escalating inbreeding. Conservation managers therefore face a dilemma: supplementary feeding may be ineffective if inbreeding is limiting stochastic population growth rate (λs), while translocations may be ineffective if food is limiting.

3. Model simulations suggested that the focal population will decline to extinction relatively rapidly with no conservation management (mean λs≈0.86) and with genetic management alone (λs≈0.90). Ecological management alone reduced but did not halt the population decline (λs≈0.93). However, simultaneous genetic and ecological management yielded population stability (λs≈1), with genetic rescue lasting ~25 years.

4. These outcomes arose because the capacity for translocations to alleviate inbreeding depression is limited by food availability, while supplementary feeding cannot achieve population viability in the presence of accumulating inbreeding. However, supplementary feeding improved environmental quality enough to allow expression of variance in fitness and thus inbreeding depression, meaning that reductions in inbreeding following translocations can increase λs.

5. Synthesis and applications. Our analyses suggest that simultaneous management of ecological and genetic threats will be critical to ensuring viability of Scotland’s chough population; neither strategy independently is likely to achieve population persistence and may consequently waste conservation resources. Managers of other resource-limited, inbred populations should consider that the efficacy of strategies designed to alleviate ecological and genetic threats may be interdependent, such that holistic management is essential to ensure population viability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2264-2273
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume56
Issue number10
Early online date20 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

viability
inbreeding
translocation
inbreeding depression
conservation management
population decline
food limitation
individual-based model
food availability
environmental quality
population growth
fitness
persistence
extinction
food
resource
simulation

Keywords

  • conservation management planning
  • conservation intervention
  • Corvid
  • extinction probability
  • gene flow
  • inbreeding-environment interactions
  • population persistence
  • population reinforcement
  • supplementary feeding
  • inbreeding–environment interactions
  • SURVIVAL
  • EFFECTIVE TOOL
  • PATTERNS
  • WILD POPULATION
  • GROWTH RATE
  • RESCUE
  • SEVERE INBREEDING DEPRESSION
  • STRESS
  • EXTINCTION
  • PYRRHOCORAX

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Evaluating the efficacy of independent versus simultaneous management strategies to address ecological and genetic threats to population viability. / Trask, Amanda E. (Corresponding Author); Fenn, Sarah R.; Bignal, Eric M.; McCracken, Davy I.; Monaghan, Pat; Reid, Jane M.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 56, No. 10, 10.2019, p. 2264-2273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trask, Amanda E. ; Fenn, Sarah R. ; Bignal, Eric M. ; McCracken, Davy I. ; Monaghan, Pat ; Reid, Jane M. / Evaluating the efficacy of independent versus simultaneous management strategies to address ecological and genetic threats to population viability. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 10. pp. 2264-2273.
@article{3ef90278a453434fbaae6c1c2fc2373d,
title = "Evaluating the efficacy of independent versus simultaneous management strategies to address ecological and genetic threats to population viability",
abstract = "1. Small, declining populations can face simultaneous, interacting ecological and genetic threats to viability. Conservation management strategies designed to tackle such threats independently may then prove ineffective. Population viability analyses that evaluate the efficacy of management strategies implemented independently versus simultaneously are then essential to the design of effective management plans, yet such quantitative evaluations are typically lacking.2. We used stochastic individual-based models, parameterised with high-quality multi-year demographic and genetic data, to evaluate the efficacy of independent or simultaneous ecological (supplementary feeding) and genetic (translocations to alleviate inbreeding) management strategies for a red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) population of major conservation concern. This population is experiencing ecological threats from food limitation and genetic threats from escalating inbreeding. Conservation managers therefore face a dilemma: supplementary feeding may be ineffective if inbreeding is limiting stochastic population growth rate (λs), while translocations may be ineffective if food is limiting.3. Model simulations suggested that the focal population will decline to extinction relatively rapidly with no conservation management (mean λs≈0.86) and with genetic management alone (λs≈0.90). Ecological management alone reduced but did not halt the population decline (λs≈0.93). However, simultaneous genetic and ecological management yielded population stability (λs≈1), with genetic rescue lasting ~25 years.4. These outcomes arose because the capacity for translocations to alleviate inbreeding depression is limited by food availability, while supplementary feeding cannot achieve population viability in the presence of accumulating inbreeding. However, supplementary feeding improved environmental quality enough to allow expression of variance in fitness and thus inbreeding depression, meaning that reductions in inbreeding following translocations can increase λs.5. Synthesis and applications. Our analyses suggest that simultaneous management of ecological and genetic threats will be critical to ensuring viability of Scotland’s chough population; neither strategy independently is likely to achieve population persistence and may consequently waste conservation resources. Managers of other resource-limited, inbred populations should consider that the efficacy of strategies designed to alleviate ecological and genetic threats may be interdependent, such that holistic management is essential to ensure population viability.",
keywords = "conservation management planning, conservation intervention, Corvid, extinction probability, gene flow, inbreeding-environment interactions, population persistence, population reinforcement, supplementary feeding, inbreeding–environment interactions, SURVIVAL, EFFECTIVE TOOL, PATTERNS, WILD POPULATION, GROWTH RATE, RESCUE, SEVERE INBREEDING DEPRESSION, STRESS, EXTINCTION, PYRRHOCORAX",
author = "Trask, {Amanda E.} and Fenn, {Sarah R.} and Bignal, {Eric M.} and McCracken, {Davy I.} and Pat Monaghan and Reid, {Jane M.}",
note = "ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Sue Bignal, all land-owners and farmers and everyone who helped with fieldwork on Islay. We thank members of the Scottish Chough Forum, particularly Rae Mckenzie and Des Thompson for valuable input on management scenarios. AET was funded by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. SRF was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council iCASE studentship supported by SNH.",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13464",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "2264--2273",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the efficacy of independent versus simultaneous management strategies to address ecological and genetic threats to population viability

AU - Trask, Amanda E.

AU - Fenn, Sarah R.

AU - Bignal, Eric M.

AU - McCracken, Davy I.

AU - Monaghan, Pat

AU - Reid, Jane M.

N1 - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Sue Bignal, all land-owners and farmers and everyone who helped with fieldwork on Islay. We thank members of the Scottish Chough Forum, particularly Rae Mckenzie and Des Thompson for valuable input on management scenarios. AET was funded by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. SRF was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council iCASE studentship supported by SNH.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - 1. Small, declining populations can face simultaneous, interacting ecological and genetic threats to viability. Conservation management strategies designed to tackle such threats independently may then prove ineffective. Population viability analyses that evaluate the efficacy of management strategies implemented independently versus simultaneously are then essential to the design of effective management plans, yet such quantitative evaluations are typically lacking.2. We used stochastic individual-based models, parameterised with high-quality multi-year demographic and genetic data, to evaluate the efficacy of independent or simultaneous ecological (supplementary feeding) and genetic (translocations to alleviate inbreeding) management strategies for a red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) population of major conservation concern. This population is experiencing ecological threats from food limitation and genetic threats from escalating inbreeding. Conservation managers therefore face a dilemma: supplementary feeding may be ineffective if inbreeding is limiting stochastic population growth rate (λs), while translocations may be ineffective if food is limiting.3. Model simulations suggested that the focal population will decline to extinction relatively rapidly with no conservation management (mean λs≈0.86) and with genetic management alone (λs≈0.90). Ecological management alone reduced but did not halt the population decline (λs≈0.93). However, simultaneous genetic and ecological management yielded population stability (λs≈1), with genetic rescue lasting ~25 years.4. These outcomes arose because the capacity for translocations to alleviate inbreeding depression is limited by food availability, while supplementary feeding cannot achieve population viability in the presence of accumulating inbreeding. However, supplementary feeding improved environmental quality enough to allow expression of variance in fitness and thus inbreeding depression, meaning that reductions in inbreeding following translocations can increase λs.5. Synthesis and applications. Our analyses suggest that simultaneous management of ecological and genetic threats will be critical to ensuring viability of Scotland’s chough population; neither strategy independently is likely to achieve population persistence and may consequently waste conservation resources. Managers of other resource-limited, inbred populations should consider that the efficacy of strategies designed to alleviate ecological and genetic threats may be interdependent, such that holistic management is essential to ensure population viability.

AB - 1. Small, declining populations can face simultaneous, interacting ecological and genetic threats to viability. Conservation management strategies designed to tackle such threats independently may then prove ineffective. Population viability analyses that evaluate the efficacy of management strategies implemented independently versus simultaneously are then essential to the design of effective management plans, yet such quantitative evaluations are typically lacking.2. We used stochastic individual-based models, parameterised with high-quality multi-year demographic and genetic data, to evaluate the efficacy of independent or simultaneous ecological (supplementary feeding) and genetic (translocations to alleviate inbreeding) management strategies for a red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) population of major conservation concern. This population is experiencing ecological threats from food limitation and genetic threats from escalating inbreeding. Conservation managers therefore face a dilemma: supplementary feeding may be ineffective if inbreeding is limiting stochastic population growth rate (λs), while translocations may be ineffective if food is limiting.3. Model simulations suggested that the focal population will decline to extinction relatively rapidly with no conservation management (mean λs≈0.86) and with genetic management alone (λs≈0.90). Ecological management alone reduced but did not halt the population decline (λs≈0.93). However, simultaneous genetic and ecological management yielded population stability (λs≈1), with genetic rescue lasting ~25 years.4. These outcomes arose because the capacity for translocations to alleviate inbreeding depression is limited by food availability, while supplementary feeding cannot achieve population viability in the presence of accumulating inbreeding. However, supplementary feeding improved environmental quality enough to allow expression of variance in fitness and thus inbreeding depression, meaning that reductions in inbreeding following translocations can increase λs.5. Synthesis and applications. Our analyses suggest that simultaneous management of ecological and genetic threats will be critical to ensuring viability of Scotland’s chough population; neither strategy independently is likely to achieve population persistence and may consequently waste conservation resources. Managers of other resource-limited, inbred populations should consider that the efficacy of strategies designed to alleviate ecological and genetic threats may be interdependent, such that holistic management is essential to ensure population viability.

KW - conservation management planning

KW - conservation intervention

KW - Corvid

KW - extinction probability

KW - gene flow

KW - inbreeding-environment interactions

KW - population persistence

KW - population reinforcement

KW - supplementary feeding

KW - inbreeding–environment interactions

KW - SURVIVAL

KW - EFFECTIVE TOOL

KW - PATTERNS

KW - WILD POPULATION

KW - GROWTH RATE

KW - RESCUE

KW - SEVERE INBREEDING DEPRESSION

KW - STRESS

KW - EXTINCTION

KW - PYRRHOCORAX

UR - http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1365-2664.13464

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/evaluating-efficacy-independent-versus-simultaneous-management-strategies-address-ecological-genetic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069684039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13464

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13464

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 2264

EP - 2273

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 10

ER -